You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Gitmo critic urges world: Take captives
2007-07-27

VIENNA, Austria - One of Europe's most vocal critics of the U.S. terror detention facility at Guantanamo Bay turned the tables on fellow opponents Thursday, urging the world's nations to speed its shutdown by agreeing to incarcerate detainees.

Belgian senator Anne-Marie Lizin, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe's special envoy for Guantanamo, told the 56-nation group that few countries are willing to imprison 80 detainees who are ready for transfer. Lizin said only Albania, a staunchly pro-U.S. nation, has expressed willingness to host Guantanamo prisoners of any kind. Albania already has taken in eight former Guantanamo inmates. She said her native Belgium has taken in two prisoners, and that Denmark, Lithuania and Germany have expressed conditional interest.

Her message to Guantanamo critics: "Criticizing the U.S. is easy — but they also have to look at reality and maybe take some responsibility. It has to be closed, because it's a negative symbol for the United States," she said. "We would like to continue this pressure until the prison is closed."

Lizin, who made her second visit to Guantanamo Bay last month, told the OSCE that conditions at the facility in Cuba have noticeably improved since her first visit in March 2006. At the time, she called for the complex to be phased out by the end of this year.

Lizin said she no longer thinks that is an option. But she urged countries to accept inmates deemed less dangerous so Guantanamo ends up being used only for the most hard-core terror suspects — "high-value" detainees in CIA parlance. About 360 men are still held at Guantanamo on suspicion of terrorism or links to al-Qaida or the Taliban.

"The situation has changed inside the jail. They have a very clear procedure for interrogation," Lizin said. Officials who question detainees "realize that today, they are observed by the entire international community ... they can no longer make the slightest error," she added."Clearly a great effort has been made," she said, crediting U.S. authorities for "very good cooperation and a very good flow of information."

Lizin visited Guantanamo at the invitation of the U.S. government, although she was not allowed access to detainees, which is reserved only for representatives of the International Red Cross. She continued to insist that all detainees have access to a lawyer and a means of redress.

Ideally, Lizin said, Middle East and North African nations such as Libya and Qatar should consider taking some of Guantanamo's detainees.

Lizin conceded that some Guantanamo prisoners who were returned to their countries of origin, such as Yemen, subsequently were found to engage themselves again in attacks on U.S. interests — and that nations might be reluctant to take detainees as a result. "Some (prisoners) are considered extremely dangerous, and a number, no doubt, are exceedingly dangerous," she said. "There's no question of considering them in terms of pure and simple innocence."
Posted by:tu3031

#9  Unreal. Totally unreal. Gary has it right.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-07-27 20:45  

#8  #7 We kept all the thousands of Germans prisoner until their leaders surrendered. Why should this be any different?

weellllll, the Germans wore uniforms and were entitled to Geneva treatments, so, I guess these mooks should be executed. Good devil's advocate point, Gary! :-)
Posted by: Frank G   2007-07-27 20:16  

#7  We kept all the thousands of Germans prisoner until their leaders surrendered. Why should this be any different?
Posted by: Gary and the Samoyeds   2007-07-27 20:09  

#6  I believe it's about time for all the critics to take responsibility and put their own money where their mouth is: the Euros can take the jihadis off our hands, the UN should accept personal financial responsibility for all their schemes out of their own Swiss accounts, and those Churches who sponsor the refugees created by them should also personally pay for their subsidies and help them relocate rather than at taxpayers' expense. Bet the policies of the bleeding hearts would change immediately.
Posted by: Danielle   2007-07-27 16:21  

#5  My exact thought too, Rambler.

Albeit, I can't think that plan is not that far off in the future.
Posted by: BA   2007-07-27 15:13  

#4  Maybe we can sell the Gitmo inmates on Ebay? Put your Pounds where your mouth is Ann-Marie? Bidding starts at $25 Million.

Better yet "Ali-Harmony.com" US could build nice prisoner profiles so any left-leaning a$$hat can make a love connection
Posted by: airandee   2007-07-27 14:58  

#3  When I read the headline, I thought that the Gitmo critic wanted the world to take Americans hostage to force us to release the poor kids at Gitmo.
Posted by: Rambler   2007-07-27 14:25  

#2  In belgium a guy who kidnaps, rapes, tortures, kills, and eats young girls gets about 12 years in prison. How long will it take these guys to talk their way out of a belgian jail.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-07-27 13:10  

#1  Yeah, let Belgium be the first to step up. But why stop at Guantanamo. Display your superior humanitarianism to those brutish Americans. Take the several tens of thousands under Ameican lock and key and give them all flats in Brussels.
Posted by: ed   2007-07-27 12:59  

00:00