Submit your comments on this article | |||||||
Home Front: WoT | |||||||
You Reap What You Sow | |||||||
2007-08-09 | |||||||
Arizona mosque targeted in "acid bomb" attack Police in Arizona said two unidentified men tossed a bottle filled with acid at a Phoenix area mosque early on Monday, splashing a caustic chemical near a Muslim cleric involved in a high-profile discrimination suit.
| |||||||
Posted by:Obvious Omens2791 |
#24 I really don't understand this story. Around here, really unpopular persons tend to have drivers shoot a 30-06 into the house as they drive by at night. It is illegal and dangerous, but it does get the point across. |
Posted by: whatadeal 2007-08-09 22:30 |
#23 Wow. New record for number of comments about the Flying Imans. Sounds like we need to get along here. After all this is the religion of peace and someone out there is trying to tarnish their reputation. |
Posted by: Jack is Back! 2007-08-09 20:20 |
#22 and did not lead him down the sordid path of wine, women, and song... For which I'm sure he's never forgiven you. |
Posted by: Lumpy Cholush8027 2007-08-09 19:41 |
#21 You reclassify that religion to a Political ideology then extinguish it. Mohammedans view their death cult as a religion, there's nothing that says we have to. Excellent observaiton, Natural Law. Regarding Zenster's quote of 'Moose's comment: Moose is correct with regard to the Hadiths. They hold the same place in Muslim thought that the Commentaries of the Holy Father did with the Roman Catholic Church's struggle with Martin Luther. Luther, and the reformers, rejected any divine "commentaries" of the scriptures, holding to the position of Sola Scriptura: "Only By Scripture". It was necessary to do so to ensure the success of the Reformation. A dual language Koran is not only possible, but they actually exist. I have, in my bookshelf, an official Koran issued under Egyptian authority with dual parallel columns of text, in Arabic and English. It was given in gratitude from a Palestinian familiy whose younger son stayed with me during a summer school program at the University I was attending. Apparently, they appreciated the fact that I exposed the boy to some actual culture, and did not lead him down the sordid path of wine, women, and song... |
Posted by: Ptah 2007-08-09 19:26 |
#20 Hi Shipman, long time no see. |
Posted by: gromgoru 2007-08-09 18:47 |
#19 By "extinguish" I mean ban the practicing of Islam within the U.S., seize and raze all Mosks (intentional misspelling), ban all Islamic groups like CAIR, stop issuing visas to Mohammedans for any and all reasons, begin mass deportations of the Mohammedans that are here, suspend all diplomatic contact with all Islamic States...etc. etc.. Wheeee! GoogleKook Bump big time! |
Posted by: Shipman 2007-08-09 18:16 |
#18 By "extinguish" I mean ban the practicing of Islam within the U.S., seize and raze all Mosks (intentional misspelling), ban all Islamic groups like CAIR, stop issuing visas to Mohammedans for any and all reasons, begin mass deportations of the Mohammedans that are here, suspend all diplomatic contact with all Islamic States...etc. etc.. Islam wouldn't have it any other way. At least it's impossible to tell from how they act. |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-08-09 18:01 |
#17 role = roll |
Posted by: Natural Law 2007-08-09 17:55 |
#16 ...but if we intend to extinguish it, I think it doesn't matter what we classify it as. By "extinguish" I mean ban the practicing of Islam within the U.S., seize and raze all Mosks (intentional misspelling), ban all Islamic groups like CAIR, stop issuing visas to Mohammedans for any and all reasons, begin mass deportations of the Mohammedans that are here, suspend all diplomatic contact with all Islamic States...etc. etc.. I'm sure I could think of some more, but you get the idea. Of course, we won't do any of that, we'll dilly and dally until we're forced to kill a few hundred million or more Mohammedans, or we'll role over and surrender just like the Europeans. Which it will be is in the balance at this point, but one thing is for sure, if we do not clean house here and soon, it will be surrender. |
Posted by: Natural Law 2007-08-09 17:52 |
#15 I think it doesn't matter what we classify it as. You're being far too logical, Mike N. Way too much of this world's population is religious and therefore cannot readily make the jump over to understanding how one particular religion might be their avowed enemy. The days of the Thugee cult are long past and no longer reside in current public memory. As 'moose so sagaciously observes over in the Dutch politician for ban on Holy Quran thread: To start with, begin with a requirement that all Korans have to be printed in, or at least with, the recognized major European languages beside the Arabic text, in accurate translations. It is a strong fundamental doctrine of Islam that Korans have to be in Arabic text, but only extremists insist that it can *only* be printed in Arabic. |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-08-09 16:37 |
#14 By definition ALL religions are "ideologies". Were Christians to begin promoting the idea that our "holy book" says its okay to slaughter infidels, I would expect a public outcry. But the politicos lack the balls to condemn Islamo-fascists that make the same pronouncements. Their cowardice is a huge mistake and lots of innocents will die as a result. |
Posted by: Crusader 2007-08-09 16:32 |
#13 You reclassify that religion to a Political ideology then extinguish it. Mohammedans view their death cult as a religion, there's nothing that says we have to. Not that I'm saying Islam, at least in it's current form, isn't crap or that it can't rightfully be classified as a political ideology, but if we intend to extinguish it, I think it doesn't matter what we classify it as. |
Posted by: Mike N. 2007-08-09 16:07 |
#12 You reclassify that religion to a Political ideology then extinguish it. Mohammedans view their death cult as a religion, there's nothing that says we have to. End of story, Natural Law. Too bad neither Bush nor the liberal left remotely comprehend this. |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-08-09 15:58 |
#11 #10... You reclassify that religion to a Political ideology then extinguish it. Mohammedans view their death cult as a religion, there's nothing that says we have to. It would be a simple matter, except for all the Lefty Ankle Biters®, just contrast and compare it with the four or five other religions with the most representation. No comparison, just because a majority of Mohammedans are illiterate and uneducated enough to believe their murderous death cult is really a religion doesn't mean the rest of the world has to! |
Posted by: Natural Law 2007-08-09 15:53 |
#10 The U.S.A. bends over backwards to insure freedom of religion for all religions. What do you do when that religion contains the seeds of your downfall and destruction and those seeds contain the replacement of your system of laws with sharia law. That religion also states that you will be servile? What happens when that religion-political system is hell-bent on your destruction? What happens when that religion says slavery and lying is O.K. in the name of allah. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2007-08-09 11:00 |
#9 Calling this an "acid bomb" is way out of proportion. Pool cleaner and aluminum foil in a 2-liter bottle? That's only going to hurt yourself if you fool around with it, it's no danger to anyone else. |
Posted by: gromky 2007-08-09 10:53 |
#8 And is it possible that the perpetrators were themselves muslims, and this was a staged incident to add to the list of examples of "islamophobia" in America? |
Posted by: Rambler 2007-08-09 10:02 |
#7 Also, I read in another posting of this 'incident' (maybe at LGF?) that the 'mosque' is a trailer with no obvious markings that it is a mosque. |
Posted by: AllahHateMe 2007-08-09 09:41 |
#6 Considering there were five more of these noisemakers thrown BEFORE this, at just random people, odds are it has nothing to do with their religion. But CAIR sure do like playing the victim. |
Posted by: Rob Crawford 2007-08-09 08:09 |
#5 Sudden Jihad Syndrome is not a hate crime, but a bottle of pool cleaner is? |
Posted by: gromgoru 2007-08-09 07:59 |
#4 The Koran is a HATE CRIME. Spot on, newc. The sooner Western countries declare it as such, the sooner we will overcome Islamism. |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-08-09 01:26 |
#3 Faja is one of six Muslim clerics known as the "Flying Imams" who are bringing a suit against US Airways alleging discrimination after they were removed from a Minneapolis to Phoenix flight last November. Yo, Didmar, mebbe you aren’t too popular right about nows, eh? Toomey said that the attack was one of six similar incidents involving the soda-bottle device in the Glendale area over a three-day period, but the other five did not appear to have a religious link. Naw, it’s just the Pepsi Generation™ putting in their "Until we know (the reason), we are going to assume that (the mosque attack) was religiously motivated," he added. Whoa Nellie! Another BGO (Blinding Glimpse of the Obvious)! In the days after the September 11, 2001, attacks, the Phoenix valley area was the scene of a widely reported hate crime in which a Phoenix man shot dead a Sikh outside his gasoline station. Ban me if you must but this seems to be more a case of mistaken identity than anything else. The victim, Balbir Singh Sodhi, was one of several Sikhs attacked in the United States after apparently being mistaken as possible supporters of Saudi-born militant Osama bin Laden, believed to be behind the attacks. Ummm … “believed to be”, even though bin Laden personally took individual credit in an internationally broadcast video? Tell you what, let’s just go with “verified” and retain some sort of a vestige of journalistic integrity. Emkay? |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-08-09 01:24 |
#2 I rather not go down that road on this soil, but since it is acceptable to soil my country with your hate, gotta hate it, but Americans are smarter than your books. |
Posted by: newc 2007-08-09 00:22 |
#1 Ooooh, a juicy "hate crime". The Koran is a HATE CRIME. |
Posted by: newc 2007-08-09 00:21 |