You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Brave Lions of Islam kidnap 15 women and children in Iraq
2007-08-23
This time, Al Qaeda kidnaps the women and children. They really must be struggling to survive when they pick on the weak this way.
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Al Qaeda fighters kidnapped 15 Iraqi women and children after rival Sunni Arab militants repelled their attack on two villages in a fierce battle on Thursday in which 32 people were killed, police said.
This time it's Sunni-on-Sunni? Isn't that unusual or does the MSM just not report it because it doesn't fit the "civil war" meme?
The fighting, rare on such a large scale, underscored the growing split between Sunni Arab militant groups and al Qaeda that U.S. forces have sought to exploit as they try to quell sectarian violence that has killed tens of thousands.
Wait a New York Minute! I thought the MSM body count was up around 700,000 or so? What's up with this reporter?
U.S. President George W. Bush, under pressure to show progress in the war or start bringing troops home, on Wednesday compared Iraq to Vietnam in urging Americans to be patient. His administration had previously avoided such comparisons, saying there were few parallels.
Except that the Donks wanna cut-n-run in both cases.
Many U.S. Democrats have likened Iraq to Vietnam, calling the war a quagmire that has exacted a toll in American lives and money without furthering U.S. interests.
Yeah, losing only a few hundred more troops in 4 years of battle than how many civilians we lost in a few hours on 9/11 is very comparable to Vietnam, who was backed by the only other superpower in the world at the time.
About 200 al Qaeda fighters raided the villages of Sheikh Tamim and Ibrahim Yehia in restive Diyala province, north of Baghdad, in the early hours of Thursday after launching a mortar attack on the area, police said.

The attack came despite a U.S. offensive in Diyala targeting al Qaeda. U.S. troops launched an operation in June to oust fighters who had taken over large parts of the provincial capital, Baquba. Many escaped to fight on.

Brigadier-General Ali Delayan, the police chief of Baquba, told Reuters that 22 residents had been killed in the fighting along with 10 al Qaeda fighters.

Several wounded residents said villagers were loyal to the Sunni Arab insurgent group, the 1920 Revolution Brigade.
So, does that make them terrorists, or just average Iraqis who have begun turning in all the AQ baddies left and right of recent?
Delayan said the attackers had escaped with eight women and seven children as hostages.

A mosque that served the two villages was destroyed in the fighting and its imam was among those killed, he added.
And, those dastardly 'mericans didn't do it? Why is this even in a MSM report then?
Delayan said the al Qaeda attackers mortared the villages before storming into them. Rocket-propelled grenades were used in the fighting, in which three houses were destroyed.

He said the gun battle with fighters loyal to the 1920 Revolution Brigade, which has recently distanced itself from al Qaeda, was triggered by the execution of four men, including the mosque imam.

Police said they arrested 22 of the attackers.
Out of 200 or so? While I applaud the police and citizens in this standing up to AQ, looks like they need a little more work on how to capture attackers. More hand-wringing over Maliki's gov't at link.
Posted by:BA

#5  It doesn't matter what the Bush admin says or does. If he said, "It is a beautiful day.", they would spin him as being oblivious to global warming and write an article on how he and Cheney are responsible for the melting ice caps.

The MSM is a function of the last century and it seems to me that they are doing all that they can to hasten their demise by making the American people despise them more and more every day.

Take this article for example. Is it me, or does it seem to others that around the same time the Democrats were forced to acknowledge that the surge was working, that the intensity of the terrorist atrocities in Iraq increased as well.

Suddenly we get stories about 5 year olds lit on fire, and other vicious crimes against women and children. It is difficult to know if the MSM has decided to shift their focus to these crimes or if to get more attention, of if AQ Inc. has actually made a decision to attack children to stay in the headlines. Lord knows the MSM was never around to report the rapes and mass atrocities during Sadaam's, or any other despot's reign.

But this is exactly what makes me despise the media. The terrorists know they will do their bidding. And when the MSM stops doing their bidding and stops writing about the day to day bombings in Iraq, the terrorists simply commit such horrific crimes that the MSM once again complies. If the staff at Reuters and other media outlets had any soul - they would realize that it is they, the men and women in the mirror who are encouraging these attacks against women and children by providing the fire that fuels the only tool the terrorists have in their hope of winning the war - negative publicity.
Posted by: Unutle McGurque8861   2007-08-23 18:02  

#4  He (W) spent as much time talking about Japan, Germany and South Korea as he did Vietnam. But the MSM are fixated (like their party machine the Dems) on Vietnam. They successfully led to our retreat there and this is their territory of delight not W's. He has done a Clinton and coop their issue and argument by giving the horrific not the defeat.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-08-23 16:45  

#3  Bush's reference to Vietnam was exactly about the consequences (deaths, deaths and more deaths) of our precipitous withdrawal from the region. Of course the assholes who write this article won't mention that. Fucking traitors.
Posted by: remoteman   2007-08-23 15:52  

#2  I would have thought that Bush's Vietnam reference would have been to highlight that what happened in Vietnam will occur in Iraq if we pull out and leave the Iraqis to unnecessary slaughter.

Second, in the fact that this article is outright propaganda, it is instructive in showing exactly what the new Democratic strategy will be, and here it is right here:

The attack came despite a U.S. offensive in Diyala targeting al Qaeda. U.S. troops launched an operation in June to oust fighters who had taken over large parts of the provincial capital, Baquba. Many escaped to fight on.

While the above statement is true - I suspect the focus until the election will be the futility of fighting because the Iraqis will never be able to form a functioning government. You have lost the war, go home.

The Democrats are busy right now sending out flyers to their constituents on how they SUPPORT THE SURGE! With no mention of how they wanted to withdraw or don't support the war. That's why they are suddenly on board. There is an election coming up and they support the surge - until they are elected of course- then once elected, they will have four years to undermine the war effort. Gotta get elected and those pesky Americans are sick of politicians who undermined the troops.
Posted by: Unutle McGurque8861   2007-08-23 15:35  

#1  There is another comparison with Vietnam and that is the use of stringers by reporters. Halberstam, Sheehan and the boys used an NVA propagandist as their source just like our AP, Rooters and the BBC use propagandist today to make the "news" comply with the agenda of the Cronkites and Brokaws.
Posted by: Heriberto Ulusomble6667   2007-08-23 11:26  

00:00