You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
'History' Teacher Asks 14-Year-Olds to Renounce U.S. Citizenship
2007-09-16
H/T Newsbuster.org
Bidwell Junior High School administrators said a letter sent home with students in an eighth-grade class Tuesday was a good idea for a history lesson, with bad execution. The letter, which appeared to ask parents to renounce their U.S. citizenship, prompted phone calls to the school from several irate recipients.

Principal Joanne Parsley said teacher Mike Brooks never intended to have parents sign the letters, or forward them on to President Bush, to whom they are addressed. "It was a well-intended lesson that didn't shake out too well," she said, adding that Brooks would not be subject to disciplinary action.
What's the 'well-intended' part?
Reached at home, the teacher said his U.S. History class is studying the Declaration of Independence, and he decided to write a letter putting the document into modern language. His intention, he said, was to send it home for parents to review, and possibly discuss with their children. He concluded the letter with "After careful consideration of the facts of our current situation, I have decided to announce to everyone that I am no longer a citizen of the United States, but a free and independent member of the global community."

"The point was, I wanted to ask parents if they would sign such a letter if conditions that existed prior to the Revolution were happening now," he said. "I just wanted to start a discussion."
Sure. Just start a discussion. That's what pomo's generally say when they're caught.
Parsley said Brooks sent the letter out with no explanation or disclaimer, and was relying on students to tell their parents it was part of a lesson plan.

She said several parents reacted adversely to the letter, but a few sent them back signed.
Okay. They've renounced their citizenship. They'd better get a green card or a visa from the 'independent global community' or we'll deport them. Maybe we should deport them anyway.
Chico resident Michael Hill said he was told by his daughter, Kaytlen Hill, 13, that the assignment was to have parents sign the letter and return it to class Wednesday. "The lesson being taught in class was that the U.S. kidnaps innocent people and takes them to Cuba, where they are kept indefinitely and tortured," Hill said he learned through his daughter.
Seems like Teacher Brooks has been busy. Wonder what other 'history' he's been teaching?
When Hill asked her if Brooks mentioned Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where the U.S. imprisons terrorist suspects, he said his daughter replied "yes."

He said his daughter broke into tears when she talked about Brooks mentioning illegal wiretaps and other surveillance directed against innocent people. "I think I was more irritated by the classroom discussion than the letter," he said.
I think you're right. Wonder if Mr. Brooks taught the class that 9/11 was an 'inside job'?
Brooks said he was trying to establish a parallel between attitudes during Revolutionary times, and those of today. "When it was written, the Declaration was considered an inflammatory document," Brooks said. "There were a lot of loyalists around then."
What parallels exist to today, exactly?
The teacher said the letter led to some "wonderful discussion" on Wednesday.

Parsley and Chico Unified School District Assistant Superintendent Bob Feaster said they were shocked when they first saw the letter, which had gone out with no administrative approval, but wanted to give Brooks a chance to explain. Parsley said he came up with good arguments for the unusual lesson plan, but would do things a little differently next time.
Since he was caught.
Today, Parsley said, the teacher will send another letter home with students, explaining exactly what the first letter was about, and assuring them that it was only for classroom discussion.

Parsley said she doesn't believe Brooks has any political agenda to advance.
Oh no, course not, just a simple teacher trying to inspire his students; just a complete coincidence that his lesson plan came out of the Democratic Underground ...
Hill contended the lesson put forth by the teacher is inappropriate for middle-school students. His daughter reportedly told him the letter was an assignment, and she'd be in trouble if he didn't sign it. "How many did sign it, maybe without reading or understanding it?" Hill said.
A few who are now no longer US citizens.
On Wednesday, Hill said he requested his daughter be put in another history class, which was done immediately. He said Parsley responded to his phone call promptly Wednesday morning. She promised that Hill, and possibly some other upset parents, would get a personal letter of apology from the school.
Not enough. Mr. Brooks should be looking for work in the food service or bowling industries.
Posted by:Sherry

#6  Parsley said she doesn't believe Brooks has any political agenda to advance.

Word has it that Parsley is buying a bridge. Her IQ matches her name.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-09-16 23:41  

#5  There's reason to believe that when it comes to the all-important issue of teaching worldviews and moral frameworks, American public schools are so sharply and consistently biased, they disqualify themselves for the core task of educating citizens. There are many ways to see the school establishment's bias. One is to look at the SATs--the standard tests that virtually all college-bound high school students take, that deeply influence high school teaching. Reading The Official SAT Study Guide ("#1 Best Seller," "The only book with SAT practice tests created by the maker") is one way to get some idea of the state of mind in the education world.

Here's a sentence from a passage that students are quizzed on. "The First World War is a classic case of the dissonance between official, male-centered history and unofficial female history." You might object that the idea of "official history" is a sham and a crock, unless you refer specifically to accounts commissioned by the combatant governments themselves. But this silly assertion is presented as if it were fact.

Or: "The reluctance in accepting this obvious fact comes from the Eurocentric conviction that the West holds a monopoly on science, logic, and clear thinking. To admit that other, culturally divergent viewpoints are equally plausible is to cast doubt on the monolithic center of Judeo-Christian belief: that there is but one of everything--God, right way, truth--and Europeans alone knew what it was." Breathtakingly absurd, breathtakingly offensive. "Europeans alone" were sufficiently interested in foreign cultures to find out what they were about. Europeans have been subject to periodic bouts of obsession with non-European cultures, from medieval fascination with Muslim philosophy and architecture through Picasso and his colleagues' 20th-century fixation on African art and onward to the present. Does Christianity hold that there is one Testament, one virtue, one sin, one Gospel, one martyr, one saint, one great man, one art, one science, one planet? Are Rousseau and Shelley part of "European culture," and all the aggressive radicals who came after? And what will Jewish, Christian, and Muslim parents think of an exam that describes monotheism as a "Eurocentric" conceit? What kind of imbecile could write such a passage?--and offer it to unwitting high school students as fact?

Naturally there are countless passages about downtrodden women and minorities, and famous women and members of minorities. One set of questions mentions these names: Duke Ellington, Margaret Atwood, one "Lois" (a student), Maya Angelou, and Rilke (who doesn't rate having his first name mentioned). It often seems as if white men just barely exist. Psychoanalysis, for example, is apparently mentioned once in this big book, in this question: "Anna Freud's impact on psychoanalysis was------, coming not from one brilliant discovery but from a lifetime of first-rate work." Her father might have had some "impact" on psychoanalysis too, but evidently it isn't worth speaking of.


Gelernter: A World Without Public Schools
Posted by: KBK   2007-09-16 22:40  

#4  "After careful consideration of the facts of our current situation, I have decided to announce to everyone that I am no longer a citizen of the United States, but a free and independent member of the global community Umma."
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-09-16 18:47  

#3  "After careful consideration of the facts of our current situation, We have decided to announce to everyone that you are no longer an employee of the Chico Unified School District, but a free and independent member of the unemployed community."

Sincerely the Parents and School Board

That Declaration of Independence from Traitors and a frogmarch out of the school in front of the student body is the only response needed. But alas, California is infested by a curious species of poisonous, spineless, bloodless jellyfish.
Posted by: ed   2007-09-16 17:01  

#2  "It was a well-intended lesson that didn't shake out too well,"

Kinda like the road to hell...

I am no longer a citizen of the United States, but a free and independent member of the global community.

I think Our Mr. Brooks could achieve his utopia much sooner if he...didn't have a job, maybe?
Gaia will provide...

Parsley said she doesn't believe Brooks has any political agenda to advance.

Well, it sounds like Our Mr. Brooks isn't the biggest idiot at Bidwell Junior High...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-09-16 16:45  

#1  Hey its just the beginning of the school year...chairman's red book next month, mein kampf next and maybe by winter we'll study the Koran.
Posted by: Boss Craising2882   2007-09-16 16:02  

00:00