You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Bin Laden losing control of Al Qaeda?
2007-09-25
LONELY, marginalisd and suddenly suspicious that he was losing his grip over the organistion he helped create, Osama bin Laden finally decided that enough was enough. At least thatÂ’s the explanation sources close to him are giving for why, after three long years of silence, the Qaeda leader has released one video and two audiotapes in the past month, including last weekÂ’s audio message calling for a jihad against Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf. According to Omar Farooqi, a Taliban liaison officer with Al Qaeda, bin Laden recently learned that a faction within his own organistion had been conspiring to sideline him, insisting—unnecessarily, bin Laden now believes—that he remain secluded for security reasons. CIA officials told Newsweek they could neither confirm nor reject the theory.

Bin Laden had long been chafing at this imposed gag order, says Farooqi, who learned from Sheikh Saeed, Al QaedaÂ’s senior leader in Afghanistan, and other top operatives that bin Laden became “extremely upset” earlier this year when he discovered that some of his lieutenants feared he was dead. Bin Laden has always loved talking to the media—he used to infuriate his onetime protector, Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar, by holding press conferences—and, according to Farooqi, bin Laden had only reluctantly gone along with the advice that his safety required absolute silence.

Farooqi refused to say which faction bin Laden believes is responsible for the so-called conspiracy, though several Taliban sources pointed to Ayman Al-Zawahiri, bin LadenÂ’s grand vizir deputy, suggesting that he might have been trying to solidify his own authority. This summer Farooqi and other Taliban sources told Newsweek that a split had emerged in Al Qaeda between the organistionÂ’s powerful Egyptian faction, led by Zawahiri, and its Libyan wing over jihadist strategy. Ever since the 2001 collapse of the Taliban, Zawahiri has been plotting to kill his nemesis, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, narrowly missing twice in 2003. But the Libyans, led by Abu Yahya al-Libi, had argued that Al QaedaÂ’s resources should be focused on supporting insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq and fomenting terrorism in the West.

The Egyptian-Libyan feud may now be history, though, thanks to Musharraf’s decision in July to storm the radical Lal Masjid in the heart of Islamabad, during which the mosque’s radical leader Abdul Rashid Ghazi was killed. Within days, Zawahiri issued a video calling on Pakistanis to “revolt”.

Soon afterward, al-Libi followed suit. Even bin Laden, who had never before called on Pakistanis to rise up against Musharraf, did so in his latest audiotape. Despite the unity over Musharraf, though, there is still plenty of talk within Al Qaeda over ZawahiriÂ’s grip on resources. And what about those who had tried to sideline bin Laden? With Osama seemingly back in charge, they can only support him, at least for now.
Posted by:Fred

#7  In much the same way Bernie lost control of his house after he died.
Posted by: eLarson   2007-09-25 18:05  

#6  "He's dead, Jim."
Posted by: Bones   2007-09-25 17:46  

#5  I still haven't seen any evidence that UBL is alive. His call to arms against Pervez may very well have been taped five years ago for all we know.

Anyway, isn't AQ designed to be a foundation and guide to promote UBL's cause but not absolutely necessary? The whole 'cell' concept of terror was designed to carry the cause forward in case the leadership got nuked or something. The cells would still be out there to be guided by whoever stands up to replace the AQ leadership.
Posted by: gorb   2007-09-25 17:05  

#4  Which would be odd considering the man has been dead for years.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-09-25 09:14  

#3  Sounds like if he wants to stay at the wheel he's going to have to come out of the cave and do a little glad handing. That's when we'll get him.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-09-25 07:29  

#2  Keep exposing yourself, Ol' Binny.
Posted by: Boss Craising2882   2007-09-25 00:59  

#1  No, Zawi is absolutely loyal to Osama, and AQ = Radical Islam still needs Osama as a symbol. Osama's poor health due to dialysis may require important oper changes, but IMO I don't believe Zawi will exclude OBL entirely from any top decision-making. The Osama I know will NOT want to be excluded anyways - only his Osama's per se death will change this. Lastly, bear in mind that most dedic Islamists will NOT want Islam = Islamism = Jihad assoc wid any defeat, failure, or serious intrigue. ONLY THING THIS ARTICLE IS TELLING ME IS THAT OSAMA IS INCAPACITATED, RADICAL ISLAM IS CURR LOSING = NOT WINNING THE WOT, AND RADICAL ISLAM NEEDS/WANTS TIME TO REBULD AND REARM FOR NEXT ROUND.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-09-25 00:22  

00:00