You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
US: Missile Defense Will Avert Iran War
2007-09-27
Clever boys. Gonna give the liberals some cognitive dissonance tonight for sure! Read on!
LONDON (AP) - The chief U.S. missile defense negotiator defended plans to place anti-missile sites in Eastern Europe, saying Wednesday that the system could prevent a war with Iran by building an effective deterrent.

"Our intent is to address emerging threats in the Middle East," U.S. Assistant Secretary of State John Rood said in an interview with The Associated Press during a visit to London to attend a conference on defense trade. "Countries like Iran are developing long-range missile systems. And we're concerned not only about the emerging capability but of the hostile intent from countries in the region."
"All we are saying is give peace a chance, can you dig it?"
Washington plans to place a radar facility in the Czech Republic and a battery of up to 10 interceptor missiles in Poland. The European sites would be added to two other interceptor sites—in California and Alaska—that are primarily in place to counter a threat from North Korea.

Moscow objects to the plans, saying the system is meant for spying on Russia.
Everything is about Russia, isn't it?
"Spies! All spies!"
Rood, a veteran arms control expert who has led a team of negotiators in two rounds of talks with Russia since July, said a European system would make it less tempting for Iran to launch a first strike, and it could also dissuade the U.S. from believing it had no alternative to a pre-emptive strike of its own.

"We think (missile defense) helps create disincentives for development of missiles," he said in regard to Iran.

The U.S. system relies on interceptor missiles with refrigerator-sized "kill vehicles" designed to destroy an incoming warhead at high speed. Rood said the sites in the western United States helped avert a crisis in the summer of 2006, when North Korea test-fired a series of missiles, including its latest long-range model, known abroad as the Taepodong-2, which experts believe could reach Alaska, Hawaii and perhaps the U.S. West Coast.

Some U.S. officials had argued for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea, but the administration did not seriously consider it, Rood said, in part because the anti-missile system provided a potential defense. "We didn't have to escalate the crisis by moving forces to the region, placing people on alert, " Rood said.

In Europe, Rood said, it is crucial to have batteries in place before a similar threat emerges from the Middle East. The Pentagon fears Iran could develop a missile capable of reaching the U.S. by 2015. Russia believes Iran is decades away from that point.

In June, Iran's top security official, Ali Larijani, called the U.S. anti-missile plan "the joke of the year."
Next year they'll publish a pic of a Standard-3 missile in the Tehran Times and tell everyone they invented it.
The new anti-missile system has become one of the most difficult issues in Washington's increasingly strained relations with Moscow. Russia's foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, said Friday that the United States' true intention was to spy on Russia. A U.S. invitation for Russia to join in its missile defense plans has so far failed to win Moscow's blessing. Nevertheless, talks with the Czech Republic and Poland continue, and Washington wants to have the system in place by 2013, Rood said.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told the AP in an interview in New York on Monday, that Iran has always maintained a defensive policy and has "never sought to expand its territory." "Iran will not attack any country," Ahmadinejad said, when asked if Iran would ever strike first against Israel.

Moscow's concern with the program, Rood said, is that it could expand beyond its current scope and weaken the capability of Russia's strategic forces.

Russia has suggested that the United States share the use of a Russian-leased radar installation in Azerbaijan and a radar in southern Russia. U.S. officials have said the radar's technology is outdated and emphasized that even if they were to use the Russian radar, it would not replace the other elements.

But the two sides have exchanged intelligence assessments on Middle East threats and U.S. experts have briefed Moscow on the system's capabilities, which Rood said fall short of being able to shoot down a Russian intercontinental ballistic missile.
OK liberals, think about this:
If you want peace, prepare for war.
Attack your enemy when he is weakest.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Posted by:gorb

#4  Rood, a veteran arms control expert who has led a team of negotiators in two rounds of talks with Russia since July, said a European system would make it less tempting for Iran to launch a first strike, and it could also dissuade the U.S. from believing it had no alternative to a pre-emptive strike of its own.

A little bit of home-grown reverse taqiyya. Even an effective missile defense shield in no way counters the overall threat of a nuclear armed Iran. The mullahs would not even blink at handing off a nuclear device to one of their proxy terror groups.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-09-27 22:51  

#3  Moscow objects to the plans, saying the system is meant for spying on Russia.

Sounds like they've been reading Pravda.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-09-27 14:41  

#2  Cyrus the Great was a Persian who conquered his Medean overlords, then went on to conquer the Neo-Babylonian empire to the west, and a couple of other things to the east. Darius I tried to continue the pattern, then the Persians and the Romans/Byzantines fought sporadically until the Muslims came roaring through. The armed forces of the Medes and the Persians never got flabby.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-09-27 11:28  

#1  Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told the AP in an interview in New York on Monday, that Iran has always maintained a defensive policy and has "never sought to expand its territory."

Where to begin in commenting on this - how about at the beginning - in 490 BC Darius I was defeated at Marathon, and they've been at it sporadically since.
Posted by: Chuckles Jaise7272   2007-09-27 01:29  

00:00