You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Tribal leaders caught up between army, militants
2007-10-03
Pashtun tribal leaders feel they are being thrust into an Iraq-style war between violent Islamists and the Pakistan army, according to an interview published here on Tuesday.

According to a Peshawar-datelined report in the Washington Times, tribal leader Haroon-ur-Rasheed told the newspaper’s correspondent, “It’s there. Bombs going off every day.” He was among a group that had travelled to the capital city of the province for several hours for the interview. The leaders described a violent tribal area in which Islamic militants routinely behead women suspected of adultery and use bombs to destroy girls schools – so far only on Sundays, when no students are present. Pakistani army forces who venture into the area are also being targeted with rockets, mortars and roadside bombs like those being used to attack American troops in Iraq. The first instance of a female suicide bomber in Pakistan took place in Bannu on Monday.

Haroon-ur-Rasheed told the newspaper, “The tribes are loyal to Pakistan. The tribal areas were used to supply the mujahideen against the Russians. We faced everything right in front of us, the Russian army. When the fighting ended, we expected prosperity, but the Americans left and we had thousands of refugees.” He said he and his companions proposed the meeting in Peshawar on the grounds that their home territory has become so dangerous that they are unable to protect Western visitors. Asked who represents the biggest threat to Islam, Osama bin Laden or the United States, one of the tribal leaders, Zarhur Afridi, said there was “no comparison.”

He said, “The US doesn’t need Osama. In Iraq, there was Saddam and he was no Osama but they attacked anyway. It’s a wish of the US to attack Muslims. Now when we see Bush poking his head into our affairs, we don’t like it.”
Posted by:Fred

#3  You know, these guys don't have a clue - if we just WANTED to attack Muslims it would be really, really clear that we were doing so. Ask the residents of Tokyo on March 11, 1945 (either one of them). (And since 9-11 was a more vile attack than Pearl Harbor, I would say such counterattacks would be even more justified now than they were in 1945.)
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-10-03 07:27  

#2  "ItÂ’s a wish of the US to attack Muslims."

It wasn't. But you're doing a good job of pushing me in that direction.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-10-03 07:19  

#1  Pashtun tribal leaders feel they are being thrust into an Iraq-style war between violent Islamists and the Pakistan army

Poor babies! Welcome to the real world, ya Neandertal f*cks.

The leaders described a violent tribal area in which Islamic militants routinely behead women suspected of adultery and use bombs to destroy girls schools – so far only on Sundays, when no students are present.

Which none of them have had the least responsibility for brewing up. No, never! Fear not, your Brave Lions of Islam™ will get around to rigging the schools with dynamite and killing your precious little girls in droves. Just be patient. Keep waiting for that strong horse to emerge and abide the carnage without taking sides. I'm sure it will all work out for you.

The first instance of a female suicide bomber in Pakistan took place in Bannu on Monday.

Pauvre petite! How's that feeling of uncertainty sitting with you? Don't you just love all those burqa-clad woman, anyone of whom could be wearing a bomb vest? Nice to see how that Islamic policy of Abject Gender Apartheid worked out so well for yez.

Asked who represents the biggest threat to Islam, Osama bin Laden or the United States, one of the tribal leaders, Zarhur Afridi, said there was “no comparison.”

How curious. The residents of Anbar felt there wasn't much comparison either. They just chose a different side. We'll let you know when it's time for all of you to rejoice over siding with bin Laden. Trust me, you'll know.

He said, “The US doesn’t need Osama. In Iraq, there was Saddam and he was no Osama but they attacked anyway. It’s a wish of the US to attack Muslims.

And it's exactly terrorist-supporting cretins like you who make that wish come true. Forsake the Taliban and hand over bin Laden, then watch how peaceful things get overnight. Don't and ... well, let's just say, keep watching Iraq for some signs of what's coming.

Posted by: Zenster   2007-10-03 04:02  

00:00