via Don Surber - "Mwalimu Daudi"'s comment becomes a great post:How Albert Gore impressed the Nobel committee enough to win remains a mystery. To the best of my knowledge, Mr. Gore has never slaughtered innocent civilians like previous Nobel Peace prize winner Arafat did. ItÂ’s true that his anti-technology crusade against global warming is likely to lead to deaths, but is it fair to the rest of the candidates for the Nobel committee to give Mr. Gore credit for future genocides?
Nor can Mr. Gore credibly claim to be a psychopathic dictator like North Vietnamese president Le Duc Tho, another Nobel Peace prize winner. To become a psychopathic dictator you must first become a dictator, and Mr. Gore failed miserably in his efforts in 2000 to steal a simple election. How embarrassing!
Impressing the committee by theft and corruption is probably also out of the question, but since Kofi Annan and the UN (more Nobel Peace prize winners) are the undisputed champions in this regard, perhaps the comparison is unfair. Nor can Mr. Gore credibly claim to be an efficient murdering and raping machine like the UN peacekeepers (yet another Nobel Peace prize winner). Competition for the Peace prize is stiff indeed!
ItÂ’s true that Mother Teresa and others like her have also won the Nobel Peace prize, but thankfully the Nobel committee has discarded such Jewish neocon garbage such as human rights, freedom, and peace. At least no one seriously believes that Mr. Gore can be accused of these heinous crimes!
I suspect that in the end Mr. Gore must have followed the path that Rigoberta Menchu traveled to claim her Nobel Peace prize - outright lying. That must be it!
Say! It’s never too early to speculate on who will win next year’s Nobel Peace prize. Some of the names that I have seen floated are OJ Simpson, the Janjaweed militia of Darfur, the Hutu Power leaders who led the Rwandan genocide, and (of course) Osama bin Laden. Remember — it’s an election year in the US and that will weight heavily in the Nobel committee’s decision.
