You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Quality control problems at the NYT ("fake but accurate" without the "accurate" part)
2007-10-15
Donald Luskin

Deborah Solomon's weekly short interviews in the New York Times Magazine are the most irritating possible example of the snotty, smarmy, smug and holier-than-thou attitude that pervades the entire enterprise that is the Times. Now "public editor" Clark Hoyt has exposed her for the fraud she is.

Though presented in a way that suggests a verbatim transcript, the order of the interview is sometimes altered, and the wording of questions is changed.. And, Solomon told me, “Very early on, I might have inserted a question retroactively, so the interview would flow better,” a practice she said she no longer uses.

“Questions For” came under fire recently when a reporter for New York Press, a free alternative weekly, interviewed two high-profile journalists — Amy Dickinson, the advice columnist who followed Ann Landers at The Chicago Tribune, and Ira Glass, creator of the public radio program “This American Life” — who said their published interviews with Solomon contained questions she never asked.

...The Times Magazine published an angry letter from NBC’s Tim Russert, who said that the portrayal of his interview with her was “misleading, callous and hurtful.”

Here's the best part, where Solomon is caught bragging about her lack of journalistic ethics:

In an interview with Columbia Journalism Review in 2005, Solomon said: “Feel free to mix the pieces of this interview around, which is what I do.”

“Is there a general protocol on that?” her questioner asked.

“There’s no Q. and A. protocol,” Solomon replied. “You can write the manual.”
Posted by:Mike

#12  Don't they have collections of NYT crosswords for sale in the bookstore?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-10-15 22:07  

#11  Um. The public editor is behind Times Select?
Posted by: KBK   2007-10-15 18:16  

#10  Ten things the NYTs can be used for:

1. Kitty litter box liner
.
.
.
I can't think of another nine. Oh well.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-10-15 18:00  

#9  Jack, there's a cure for NYT addiction.

Cancel your subscription.

That's all. No withdrawal symptoms, no methodone--just quit cold turkey.
Posted by: Mike   2007-10-15 17:20  

#8  Jack, Jack, Jack....

How long have you had this problem?

Do you want to talk about it?

Have you sought professional help?

Maybe we at the 'Burg can be of assistance?
Posted by: Bobby   2007-10-15 17:12  

#7  Okay, I admit I get the NYTs but only the Sunday edition - for the crossword (this is the political equivalent of saying you only read Playboy for the stories). Each Sunday I read Solomon's Q&A feature to see if somehow she is able to weave in an anti-American, anti-Bush, anti-WoT, anti-Iraq or pro-NYT progressive humanist secularist agenda. Even if the interviewee is a fashion designer, condo developer, hotel magnate, investor, etc. She never fails to disappoint. Its for that reason, that I always felt her interviews were contrived. Good to know, I wasn't the only one believing that.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-10-15 14:14  

#6  FFF; Fiction and fraud without frills.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-10-15 12:39  

#5  Isn't that a academic major? Creative Journalism?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2007-10-15 11:14  

#4  
I like to call it Creative Journalism

sounds sorta artsy
Posted by: macofromoc   2007-10-15 11:08  

#3  Quality control problems at the NYT ("fake but accurate" without the "accurate" part)

It's a feature, not a bug.
Posted by: Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr   2007-10-15 10:58  

#2  Good to see that some of the old traditions haven't gone away.
One helpful hint though, honey? If ya gonna get caught, it's better if you're dead...
Posted by: The Ghost of Walter Duranty   2007-10-15 10:50  

#1  Apparently, the difference between 'journalism' and 'just making stuff up' is that there isn't one.
Posted by: SteveS   2007-10-15 10:35  

00:00