| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Zogby Poll: Half Say They Would Never Vote for Hillary Clinton for President |
| 2007-10-23 |
|
| Posted by:anonymous5089 |
| #19 BA - AFAIK - she's enrolled at |
| Posted by: Frank G 2007-10-23 22:44 |
| #18 Doc, there was rumor for a while that our (Atlanta area) former "fine" Rep. (Cynthia McKinney-D-Moonbatsville) was gonna take a run against Nader for the Green primaries. That could get interesting! |
| Posted by: BA 2007-10-23 22:18 |
| #17 13 months to go before November elex - 15 come January 2009 when Dubya leaves. *Dubya & Admin promise to stop Iran from having a nuke weapon/bomb = US-Iran conflict before elex or Jan 2009, btwn now thru June early summer 2008 as long as no chance of Iraq-style insurgency. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-10-23 19:02 |
| #16 Correct, eLarson, after all, that's how Bill got elected. Twice. No 3rd party candidate from the Right. However, if we can get the Greenies to put up someone who will gather the moonbat vote, I'm all for it ... |
| Posted by: Steve White 2007-10-23 18:45 |
| #15 that 40% is what makes me feel all the more hinky about our nation's "evangelical leaders" proposing a 3rd party candidate. If there is one thing that will all but assure another Clinton--and this one a definite dyed-in-the-wool Marxist--administration, it is a 3rd party candidate. As an evangelical myself, I can state categorically I will NOT vote for a 3rd Party in this race. Sorry to Land and Dobson, but I will take a 5/8 Republican to be a 5/8 Friend, not a 3/8 Enemy... and I will take him over a Marxist any day of the week, and twice on Tuesday. Well... okay. Not twice in Maryland. But back when I was in Chicago... |
| Posted by: eLarson 2007-10-23 17:39 |
| #14 #12 - Frank, I'll be right there beside you if necessary. I'm not particularly wild about any of the Republican candidates right now, but any of them would be better than Shillary. |
| Posted by: Rambler 2007-10-23 16:07 |
| #13 Mother MacCree, ed. Those pics of the Hildabeast are SEARED, SEARED in my memory, like a red-hot branding iron of duh mahnd! Heck fire, the Imus pic on the blog ads looks positively pleasant compared to your link! I yam goin' to the Men's Shelter right now for some quiet time. Thanks, ed....... |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2007-10-23 15:38 |
| #12 I'll crawl nekkid across broken glass to vote against this lying socialist bitch |
| Posted by: Frank G 2007-10-23 15:33 |
| #11 I few years ago I had a bumper sticker that said "Vote For the Crook - It's Important". And I did vote for the crook, and he won. The crook was Edwin Edwards. His opponent was David Duke. That was the RUNOFF! |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2007-10-23 14:37 |
| #10 #8 Brer - When I was living in North Carolina 30+ years ago, I did vote for someone to make sure the other would lose - in the Democratic presidential primary. (Had to register as a Dem to do it, but after the election I re-registered as an Independant and never looked back.) The person I was helping to lose was "segregation now and forever" George Wallace. Unfortunately, the person I was helping to win was Peanut. Still not sure I made the right choice. :-( |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2007-10-23 14:21 |
| #9 Half of all eligable Americans don't vote so Zogby's poll doesn't really say much. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2007-10-23 14:04 |
| #8 I've never specifically voted for someone just to make sure the other person would lose. I always picked my political hack by their stance on my important issues. I will say this time, I will vote for anybody running against Hillary. I know others who feel the same. |
| Posted by: BrerRabbit 2007-10-23 13:39 |
| #7 Hillary should get about 38% when the black men vote their conscience in the privacy of the booth. Even hate of America has it's limits. |
| Posted by: wxjames 2007-10-23 12:51 |
| #6 BTW, I think that's highly optimistic. In 2004 Kerry got 48.3% of the vote and he built his political career on treason. |
| Posted by: ed 2007-10-23 12:42 |
| #5 If you are right, Charles, I'll be at least half smiling on election night 2008... |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2007-10-23 12:34 |
| #4 Speaking of Hillary photos. Here is a collection that might be of use to the mods. Well done, Zombie. |
| Posted by: ed 2007-10-23 12:34 |
| #3 M. Murcek: My guess is that Hillary will manage about 40% of the vote if the election happened today between her and Guiliani. She has just to much baggage for many people to pull the damn lever for her. She has a stigma on her as being the Hildabeast geez like Kerry had the Stigma of being a liar and military disgrace. Also a huge part in this is the spouses. I firmly believe some people didn't vote/stayed home for Kerry because they didn't want his WIFE anywhere near the White House. Even more may do the same to keep Billy Boy away from the White House again. |
| Posted by: Charles 2007-10-23 12:05 |
| #2 Big question is: half of people lie about what they do in private in the voting booth. Does that mean half that half will pull for hilldebeast? Or that she'll get trounced even worse? |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2007-10-23 11:41 |
| #1 That photo looks like it could have come from an Ed Wood film. Nice find! |
| Posted by: eLarson 2007-10-23 11:16 |