You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Evidence Implicates Assad Personally in NKor Nuclear Deal
2007-10-29
DEBKA. Salt to taste.
President Bashar Assad was personally involved in DamascusÂ’ nuclear deal with Pyongyang. Documentary proofs of this, obtained from the presidential bureau and signed by Assad in person, are now in the hands of the US and Israeli intelligence services, DEBKAfileÂ’s intelligence sources report. In one, Assad hands down a specific order in his own handwriting that North Korea not be charged for Syrian goods, including an annual shipment of 100,000 tons of Durham wheat for five years worth a total of $120 million. This is the equivalent of the value of the reactor for producing plutonium up to its most radioactive stage, which North Korea promised Syria.

A high-ranking Western intelligence source speaking to DEBKAfile described the evidence against Assad in US and Israeli hands as solid and much closer to a smoking gun than the West has turned up against IranÂ’s nuclear program. The following sequence of events unfolds from the garnered documents:

Damascus and Pyongyang settled between them that the nuclear transaction would be masked as a joint venture to build a cement factory in northern Syria; meanwhile, North Korea would sell Syria cement for its development projects.

According to DEBKAfileÂ’s sources, North Korean freighters, which began putting in at SyriaÂ’s Latakia and Tartus ports in January 2007, unloaded cargoes of cement in which nuclear reactor components and materials were concealed.

The North Korean traffic at these ports and the Durham wheat transaction attracted the attention of US and Israeli secret services.

During the next eight months – up until the Israeli attack on Syria’s North Korean installation - wheat prices shot up on international markets. Indeed the price of Durham wheat doubled. Had this been a normal commercial transaction, Syria would have claimed additional North Korean goods in compensation. In fact, when import-export officials in Damascus, who knew nothing of the nuclear reactor tradeoff, pointed Assad’s office to the price fluctuations on the wheat market, they were told that the contracts signed by the president in person must go through without changes.

When later, the Syrian wheat crop fell short of expectations, Syrian officials were again told to fill the North Korean orders in full.

On Sept. 3, the North Korean “cement ship” Al Hamed docked at Tartus. The freight it unloaded was trucked directly to the “cement factory” at Al Tibnah in the Syrian Desert, east of the Euphrates River. The Israeli attack took place three days later.

Last Tuesday, Oct. 23, the Syrian ambassador to Washington Imad Mustapha was invited to address the prestigious Institute on Religion and Public Policy. In answer to a question, he acknowledged, “Syria gives North Korea wheat, oil and other products.” He declined to disclose what Syria got in return. When pressed on this point, Mustapha said in exasperation: “Stuff. We get stuff.”

Thursday, Oct. 25, a number of leading American media simultaneously ran satellite images of a nuclear installation standing at Al Tibnah in August 2007 and the same site in the second half of September, after it had been cleared of the debris left by the Israeli attack.

This time, Damascus found nothing to say – although Syrian officials had commented on former leaks related to the episode. DEBKAfile’s Syrian sources report that this and other symptoms indicate that Assad finds himself in a tight corner. He is at a loss to explain to the Syrian public and, worse, to most of his colleagues in the political and military leadership who were kept ignorant of the nuclear transaction with North Korea, how he came to entangle the country in this ill-fated adventure.

In the view of DEBKAfileÂ’s Western intelligence source, the Syrian presidentÂ’s internal and international plight is more acute than that of the Iranian regime or Saddam Hussein in the days leading up to the 2003 US invasion. No incontrovertible proof has so far been shown to demonstrate that Iran has attained the capacity to produce nuclear or radioactive weapons, any more than the Iraqi ruler was positively shown to have weapons of mass destruction. AssadÂ’s case is more unfortunate; it is now supported by solid evidence in American and Israeli hands.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  #9: I was surprised to learn that Syria produced anything of any worth.

You never know, maybe the Swedes have been up all night drinking.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-10-29 16:13  

#9  I was surprised to learn that Syria produced anything of any worth. There is a poor wheat crop in Syria and production has gone down due to low rainfall. Also consumption has gone up due to the rising number of refugees. Both influences would tend to drive up the price of wheat. 100,000 tons to NK isn't that much of the crop. Wheat for nuclear technology?
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-10-29 12:53  

#8  price of Durham wheat doubled

Australian drought.
Posted by: ed   2007-10-29 12:01  

#7  Ummmm... Oil for Food, and Wheat for "Stuff"....

Makes sense to me...
Posted by: BigEd   2007-10-29 12:01  

#6  NKor's only real cash crops are nuclear tech and missiles. The tree bark elixir is a bit of an acquired taste, I suspect, due to the high juche content.
Posted by: eLarson   2007-10-29 10:54  

#5  No fuel yet. Still building and erecting. It would be interesting to speculate how to bring in the rods [from Iran? from NKOR?] Or do they exist underground in Syria from Saddam's program transfer pre-war? I think another shoe has to drop.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-10-29 09:55  

#4  An Israeli war with Egypt? Egypt would have to drive through the Sinai desert and Gaza Strip to get to Israel, right? And the troops would be wide open to pounding by Israel's air force the entire time? I seem to recall the last time Egypt tried anything like that, Israeli tanks got halfway to Cairo before a ceasefire was imposed.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-10-29 05:10  

#3  That part about the rise in grain prices rings true. That's the sort of thing that good intelligence people are supposed to notice. If I was really motivated I'd go look at commodity prices and see if Debka made it up or not.
Posted by: gromky   2007-10-29 01:20  

#2  Iran > desires to increase its output/exports of cement = "cement"???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-29 01:01  

#1  9/6 > what happened to the nuke fuel, iff any,???
ION, COUNTERTERRORISM BLOG > ISRAEL - WAR WITH EGYPT IN THE WINTER?; + ISR OP-ED > DOES ISRAEL WANT WAR WITH EGYPT?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-29 01:00  

00:00