You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Saudi Arabia is hub of world terror
2007-11-04
King Abdullah was surprised during his two-day state visit to Britain last week by the barrage of criticism directed at the Saudi kingdom. Officials were in “considerable shock”, one former British diplomat said.
Y'don't think the "Star Wars" theme music might have tipped them off?
Back home the king is regarded as a modest reformer who has cracked down on home-grown terrorism and loosened a few relatively minor restrictions on his subjectsÂ’ personal freedom.
To anyone with eyes in his head, they've been busy playing both ends against the middle, maintaining a foreign policy grounded in arrogance and large amounts of cash while using both government and non-government affiliated organizations to push their religion down the throats of the rest of the world.
With oil prices surging, Saudi Arabia is growing in prosperity and embracing some modern trappings. Bibles and crucifixes are still banned, but internet access is spreading and there are plans for “Mile High Tower”, the world’s tallest skyscraper, in Jeddah.
The internet is a weapon to be used by the global jihadists. But if we win in the end, it will largely be because that weapon cuts both ways.
As a key ally of the West, the king had every reason to expect a warm welcome.
"Yeah. Those dumbassed infidels ain't noticed a thing!"
Yet wealthy Saudis remain the chief financiers of worldwide terror networks.
No! Reeeeeeeally?
“If I could somehow snap my fingers and cut off the funding from one country, it would be Saudi Arabia,” said Stuart Levey, the US Treasury official in charge of tracking terror financing.
That's where the biggest pot of money funds the biggest herd of holy men.
Extremist clerics provide a stream of recruits to some of the worldÂ’s nastiest trouble spots.
And they do it on King Abdullah's petrodollar.
An analysis by NBC News suggested that the Saudis make up 55% of foreign fighters in Iraq. They are also among the most uncompromising and militant.
That's because they've been raised in that fundo crap since they were eggs.
Half the foreign fighters held by the US at Camp Cropper near Baghdad are Saudis. They are kept in yellow jumpsuits in a separate, windowless compound after they attempted to impose sharia on the other detainees and preached an extreme form of Wahhabist Islam.
Islam on its own is merely unpleasant to the rest of the world. Salafism preys on everyone, whether religious or not, to include other Muslims.
In recent months, Saudi religious scholars have caused consternation in Iraq and Iran by issuing fatwas calling for the destruction of the great ShiÂ’ite shrines in Najaf and Karbala in Iraq, some of which have already been bombed. And while prominent members of the ruling al-Saud dynasty regularly express their abhorrence of terrorism, leading figures within the kingdom who advocate extremism are tolerated.
Even revered.
Sheikh Saleh al-Luhaidan, the chief justice, who oversees terrorist trials, was recorded on tape in a mosque in 2004, encouraging young men to fight in Iraq. “Entering Iraq has become risky now,” he cautioned. “It requires avoiding those evil satellites and those drone aircraft, which own every corner of the skies over Iraq. If someone knows that he is capable of entering Iraq in order to join the fight, and if his intention is to raise up the word of God, then he is free to do so.”
So here we have a member of the Soddy government encouraging young Soddies to run away to fight us infidels. He's doing so in a state-funded mosque, and his pay check is from the state. But, really, it's not a matter of state policy. I'm not sure my mind is limber enough to envelop that idea.
The Bush administration is split over how to deal with the Saudi threat, with the State Department warning against pressure that might lead the royal family to fall and be replaced by more dangerous extremists. “The urban legend is that George Bush and Dick Cheney are close to the Saudis because of oil and their past ties with them, but they’re pretty disillusioned with them,” said Stephen Schwartz, of the Centre for Islamic Pluralism in Washington. “The problem is that the Saudis have been part of American policy for so long that it’s not easy to work out a solution.”
The problem is also that they're at the heart of Islam, and many of our allies in the war on terror are in fact Muslim. We are at war with Salafism, but Salafism is the state religion of Soddy Arabia. Intricately intertwined are the worms in that can.
According to Levey, not one person identified by America or the United Nations as a terrorist financier has been prosecuted by Saudi authorities.
Kind of obvious they won't be, too.
A fortnight ago exasperated US Treasury officials named three Saudi citizens as terrorist financiers. “In order to deter other would-be donors, it is important to hold these terrorists publicly accountable,” Levey said. All three had worked in the Philippines, where they are alleged to have helped to finance the Abu Sayyaf group, an Al-Qaeda affiliate. One, Muhammad Sughayr, was said to be the main link between Abu Sayyaf and wealthy Gulf donors. Sughayr was arrested in the Philippines in 2005 and swiftly deported to Saudi Arabia after pressure from the Saudi embassy in Manila. There is no evidence that he was prosecuted on his return home.
Prosecutions are for those who engage in terrorism within Soddy Arabia. Despite the number of Soddy policemen and national guard killed in those operations, we've yet to see anyone's head chopped off.
This year the Saudis arrested 10 people thought to be terrorist financiers, but the excitement faded when their defence lawyers claimed that they were political dissidents and human rights groups took up their cause.

Matthew Levitt, a former intelligence analyst at the US Treasury and counter-terrorism expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, believes the Saudis could do more. He said: “It is important for the Saudis to hold people publicly accountable. Key financiers have built up considerable personal wealth and are loath to put that at risk. There is some evidence that individuals who have been outed have curtailed their financial activities.”
Best take a look at the activities of their relatives, then. And if they haven't picked up the ball, check the financial records of mosque associates.
In the past the Saudis openly supported Islamic militants. Osama Bin Laden was originally treated as a favourite son of the regime and feted as a hero for fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. Huge charitable organisations such as the International Islamic Relief Organisation and the al-Haramain Foundation – accused in American court documents of having links to extremist groups – flourished, sometimes with patronage from senior Saudi royals.

The 1991 Gulf war was a wake-up call for the Saudis. Bin Laden began making vitriolic attacks on the Saudi royal family for cooperating with the US and demanded the expulsion of foreign troops from Arabia. His citizenship was revoked in 1994. The 1996 attack on the Khobar Towers in Dhahran, which killed 19 US servicemen and one Saudi, was a warning that he could strike within the kingdom.
The tool used in that particular attack was Soddy Hezbollah, if I remember correctly, which kinda proves my contention that all Islamic terrorism is one -- the terrorism part is more important than the Islamic part.
As long as foreigners were the principal targets, the Saudis turned a blind eye to terror. Even the September 11 attacks of 2001, in which 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis, could not shake their complacency. Despite promises to crack down on radical imams, Saudi mosques continued to preach hatred of America.

The mood began to change in 2003 and 2004, when Al-Qaeda mounted a series of terrorist attacks within the kingdom that threatened to become an insurgency. “They finally acknowledged at the highest levels that they had a problem and it was coming for them,” said Rachel Bronson, the author of Thicker than Oil: America’s Uneasy Partnership with Saudi Arabia.

Assassination attempts against security officials caused some of the royals to fear for their own safety. In May 2004 Islamic terrorists struck two oil industry installations and a foreignersÂ’ housing compound in Khobar, taking 50 hostages and killing 22 of them. The Saudi authorities began to cooperate more with the FBI, clamp down on extremist charities, monitor mosques and keep a watchful eye on fighters returning from Iraq.

Only last month Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul-Aziz al-Sheikh, the kingdom’s leading cleric, criticised gullible Saudis for becoming “convenient knights for whoever wants to exploit their zeal, even to the point of turning them into walking bombs”. And last week in London, King Abdullah warned young British Muslims not to become involved with extremists.

Yet the SaudisÂ’ ambivalence towards terrorism has not gone away. Money for foreign fighters and terror groups still pours out of the kingdom, but it now tends to be carried in cash by couriers rather than sent through the wires, where it can be stopped and identified more easily. A National Commission for Relief and Charity Work Abroad, a nongovernmental organisation that was intended to regulate private aid abroad to guard against terrorist financing, has still not been created three years after it was trumpeted by the Saudi embassy in Washington.

Hundreds of Islamic militants have been arrested but many have been released after undergoing reeducation programmes led by Muslim clerics.
And to date not one head has been chopped off.
According to the daily Alwatan, the interior ministry has given 115m riyals (£14.7m) to detainees and their families to help them to repay debts, to assist families with health care and housing, to pay for weddings and to buy a car on their release. The most needy prisoners’ families receive 2,000-3,000 riyals (£286 to £384) a month. Ali Saad Al-Mussa, a lecturer at King Khaled University in Abha, protested: “I’m afraid that holding [extremist] views leads to earning a prize or, worse, a steady income.”

Former detainees from the US military prison at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba are also benefiting. To celebrate the Muslim holiday of Eid, 55 prisoners were temporarily released last month and given the equivalent of £1,300 each to spend with their families.

School textbooks still teach the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a notorious antiSemitic forgery, and preach hatred towards Christians, Jews and other religions, including ShiÂ’ite Muslims, who are considered heretics.
The Soddies (and other Muslims worldwide) seem to have swallowed whole the story of the Protocols. We can see on a near daily basis the evidence that they've "countered" them by developing their own Protocols, which I've been referring to for a number of years now as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Islam. This as yet theoretical document lays out the plan for Muslims to subvert the world and take it over, instituting shariah and subjugating all other religions. The structure it creates features a "lower house", which would be the Supreme Council of Global Jihad or its successor. I discount the Supreme Council as the controller of all jihad simply based on its size. My guess is that the "upper house" lies entirely within Soddy Arabia and consists of princes and holy men, and that there's a "politiburo" that does the actual thinking and planning. Try as we might, we have distressingly few details from open source on these entities. Even the Supreme Council was only briefly visible but then disappeared, taking its web page with it.
Ali al-Ahmed, director of the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs, said: “The Saudi education system has over 5m children using these books. If only one in 1,000 take these teachings to heart and seek to act on them violently, there will be 5,000 terrorists.”

In frustration, Arlen Specter, the Republican senator for Pennsylvania, introduced the Saudi Arabia Accountability Act 10 days ago, calling for strong encouragement of the Saudi government to “end its support for institutions that fund, train, incite, encourage or in any other way aid and abet terrorism”. The act, however, is expected to die when it reaches the Senate foreign relations committee: the Bush administration is counting on Saudi Arabia to help stabilise Iraq, curtail Iran’s nuclear and regional ambitions and give a push to the Israeli and Palestinian peace process at a conference due to be held this month in Annapolis, Maryland. “Do we really want to take on the Saudis at the moment?” asks Bronson. “We’ve got enough problems as it is.”
Posted by:tipper

#7  In the end it's not so much Religion as using "Religion" as a means to absolute power. Go read Frank Herbert's "Dune". Spice = oil=power.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2007-11-04 20:19  

#6  The tool used in that particular attack was Soddy Hezbollah, if I remember correctly, which kinda proves my contention that all Islamic terrorism is one -- the terrorism part is more important than the Islamic part.

I also meant to comment on this as it was one of Fred's most important observations. Many people still dispute the monolithic character of Islam. The fundamentally evil nature of terrorism—and how it is almost universally embraced by the Islamic world—makes Muslims collectively responsible for it. By permitting this one underlying theme of violent predation upon innocents to permeate their creed, they universally forfeit any legitimacy in the eyes of the outside world.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-11-04 14:29  

#5  
They are kept in yellow jumpsuits in a separate, windowless compound after they attempted to impose sharia on the other detainees and preached an extreme form of Wahhabist Islam.
Yet another good reason to hold all suspected and convicted terrorists in solitary confinement.
Sheikh Saleh al-Luhaidan, the chief justice, who oversees terrorist trials, was recorded on tape in a mosque in 2004, encouraging young men to fight in Iraq. “Entering Iraq has become risky now,” he cautioned. “It requires avoiding those evil satellites and those drone aircraft, which own every corner of the skies over Iraq. If someone knows that he is capable of entering Iraq in order to join the fight, and if his intention is to raise up the word of God, then he is free to do so.”
Isn't it kind of odd to hear a the chief justice of a country that relies quite heavily upon American military technology decry its effectiveness in thwarting terrorism? What that tells me is Saudi Arabia would like nothing better than to turn that same technology directly against America. Due to perennial Muslim incompetence they are in no position to use their American supplied arms to do so. Instead, they send their young extremists to fly fully loaded passenger jet airliners into our occupied skyscrapers.

Can there really be any doubt that if they had nuclear weapons we might have already been attacked with one?

So here we have a member of the Soddy government encouraging young Soddies to run away to fight us infidels. He's doing so in a state-funded mosque, and his pay check is from the state. But, really, it's not a matter of state policy. I'm not sure my mind is limber enough to envelop that idea.

This is nothing more or less than a formal declaration of war by the Saudi government and it should be treated exactly as that. In typical Islamic fashion, the Saudis want all the perks of being an honest player on the world stage while—at the same exact time—conducting its own subversive terrorist agenda. This is taqiyya writ large and epitomizes the Saudi's—and general Muslim population's—sense of entitlement.

The current instability in Pakistan places it in priority of intervention directly behind Iran. After those two snake pits, it is Saudi Arabia that must be taken to task. None of this evil is going to stop until the House of Saud is smashed relentlessly and finally. If this requires destroying the shrines at Mecca and Medina, I no longer oppose such a notion. I have railed against it in the past, but Islam is of such an overwhelmingly evil nature that its time on earth has run out.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-11-04 14:02  

#4  Saudi influence in Pakistan is enough to show what a dangerous world these wahabbist are creating!!!!!
Posted by: Paul   2007-11-04 13:15  

#3  Condi told me they were a valuable ally in WoT.
Posted by: George II   2007-11-04 13:12  

#2  Points for the British officials who were willing to point out the obvious. The shock musta been from the expectation that the usual suspects would roll over and take it graciously. That's the behavior of the American government when it comes to the death and destruction wrought upon its citizens by the illegals from places like Mexico. Treat visiting Mexican officials like fellow rulers of the unwashed masses long lost family, rather than the people responsible for dumping their unskilled, uneducated, unwanted upon American, in order to resist reform and retain power.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-11-04 09:20  

#1  I don't think enough people appreciate that if we jam a big enough branch between the spokes, the wheel stops turning and the hub is frozen in place...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2007-11-04 07:39  

00:00