You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Kerry Vows to Disprove Swift Boat Claims
2007-11-17
BOSTON (AP) - Sen. John Kerry, whose 2004 presidential campaign was torpedoed by critics of his Vietnam War record, said Friday he has personally accepted a Texas oilman's offer to pay $1 million to anyone who can disprove even a single charge of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
Why? Is he planning on running again in 2012?
In a letter to T. Boone Pickens, the Massachusetts Democrat wrote: "While I am prepared to show they lied on allegation after allegation, you have generously offered to pay one million dollars for just one thing that can be proven false. I am prepared to prove the lie beyond any reasonable doubt."
Why didn't you do it when it might have counted?
Kerry, a Navy veteran and former prosecutor, said he was willing to present his case directly to Pickens, who provided $3 million to bankroll the group during Kerry's race against President Bush.
Sounds more like grandstanding than repudiating.
Kerry said he would donate any proceeds to the Paralyzed Veterans of America.
A move borrowed from his hero and mentor, Rush Limbaugh. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
The senator said Pickens issued the challenge Nov. 6 in Washington, while serving as chairman of a 40th anniversary gala for American Spectator magazine.

In the letter, Kerry offered to travel to Dallas to meet with Pickens in a public forum or to invite him to come to Massachusetts. He suggested the two could visit the Paralyzed Veterans of America in Norwood to see firsthand how Pickens' money could be used to help veterans. A copy of the letter was provided to The Associated Press.

Pickens spokesman Jay Rosser asked to review the letter before commenting.

First in the book "Unfit for Command," and then in a series of television commercials, Kerry's critics challenged the circumstances for his military awards, accused him of doctoring reports and argued he never traveled into Cambodia as claimed.

While fellow veterans and reporters disproved many of the group's claims at the time, Kerry refused to air ads responding to the criticism. His own response was muted for fear of legitimizing his critics' attacks. The senator conceded after losing to Bush that his lackluster response likely cost him the election.
That and his being a stiff, unlikable candidate with no record as a Senator and no vision for America ...
Ever since, Kerry has worked to lay the criticisms to rest.
Better than him "working" as a congressman, anyway.
In May 2005, he began allowing reporters access to his full Navy personnel and medical records - something he refused to do during the campaign. Those records mostly duplicated documents Kerry released during the 2004 campaign. In addition, they included numerous commendations from commanders who criticized Kerry's service during the presidential race. That disclosure renewed questions about why Kerry did not respond more forcefully with control over the White House at stake.
Just release the DD214 and we can decide for ourselves.

Kerry decided against launching a second bid for president, but vowed to defend his record and prevent other candidates from being "Swift-boated."

In his letter to Pickens, the senator challenged the billionaire's honor. "I trust that you are a man of your word, having made a very public challenge at a major Washington dinner, and look forward to taking you up on this challenge," Kerry wrote.
Posted by:gorb

#16  I believe the basis for his not releasing his military records, except partially to the Boston Globe: that he is sitting on an OTH discharge that was upgraded when Jummah left office. Otherwise, why is his discharge date two years after the end of his six-year obligation??
Posted by: Phinater Thraviger   2007-11-17 21:41  

#15  Always fighting the last war....
Posted by: Gomez Whineth7908   2007-11-17 21:05  

#14  Kerry Vows to Disprove Swift Boat Claims

For extra realism John F'N Kerry will release the entire Wad of records from a canal in Cambodia @ 0-darkthirty!
Posted by: Red Dawg   2007-11-17 13:58  

#13  "I am prepared to prove the lie beyond any reasonable doubt"

Simply put, if you could-a you would-a.
Posted by: Intrinsicpilot   2007-11-17 12:19  

#12  What he has done is walked into a trap. He is a gullible narcissistic buffoon who will be dropped into the s**t of his own making. There is more here than John O'Niell ever let be known and some of it very embarrassing and potentially criminal. I hope he goes through with this. Pickens didn't make his billions by being stupid unlike JFnK who married into his.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-11-17 12:09  

#11  It's truthy, Verlaine. He says it was disproved, therefore it was. And therefore, it isn't propaganda. Truthiness is such a useful concept!
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-11-17 11:40  

#10  Pickens is no dummy, I expect the 'proof' meeting will have to be on video, and the 'single charge' to be refuted is stated in advance. If Jon Carry wants to prove the boat serial number is mis-stated, fine. If Jummy Carter says the pardon was for a general discharge vs the suspected dishonorable one, fine. If jane fonda is his material witness, fine.
Posted by: Phinater Thraviger   2007-11-17 11:34  

#9  While fellow veterans and reporters disproved many of the group's claims at the time, Kerry refused to air ads responding to the criticism. His own response was muted for fear of legitimizing his critics' attacks. The senator conceded after losing to Bush that his lackluster response likely cost him the election.

Umm, I didn't follow this all that closely at the time, since his VN service was irrelevant to, and couldn't possibly affect, his clear unfitness to be CinC. But isn't the above passage - even by current, astonishing "standards" - a jaw-dropping bit of political propaganda inserted in a "news report"?

Posted by: Verlaine   2007-11-17 11:18  

#8  Whatsamatta, Jawn? The old lady cut off your allowance?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-11-17 10:30  

#7  If Kerry had any real evidence, he would lay it out and say, "Here is proof".

He did everything *but* that, offering endless "get togethers", "rap sessions", "personal meetings", and bullshit like that, he could later walk out of and *say* he had "proven that everything was all lies", even though Pickens would say he did no such thing.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-11-17 10:28  

#6  ION - OJ still searching for real murderer.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2007-11-17 10:09  

#5  It would seem that there is some risk here to JFnK. If an unresolved dispute arises between Kerry and Pickens regarding payment of the $1,000,000 and a lawsuit arises, it would seem that these deep-sixed military records could become a matter of public record.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-11-17 09:54  

#4  Bad is correct. This tool still hasn't released all his records, just trickled out favorable or neutral ones. Release em all or remain defined as a arrogant traitorous self-promoting POS, Jon Carry
Posted by: Frank G   2007-11-17 08:17  

#3  I wonder if Kerry wakes up in cold sweats at night with the nightmare that some petty clerk somewhere will do a NYT routine on him the way some one else did with classified information and put his personnel file on line to be cached at thousand unreachable places on the net. Does the word 'leak' get his attention? Of course to actual have nightmares means you still have a soul to worry about. Never mind.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-11-17 08:09  

#2  Either Kerry is planning on running, or still thinks there is some relevance to this.

Kerry, you lost. You are a loser. Go retire or something. The US will not take you back.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-11-17 07:54  

#1  My understanding is that there are a number of records that have not yet been released. Some form he must sign and hasn't that will allow release of those records.

The rumor is that the remainder of the records are politically damaging so much so his career in politics would be over, even in Massachusetts.

That's what I heard anyway.
Posted by: badanov   2007-11-17 07:48  

00:00