Submit your comments on this article | |||
India-Pakistan | |||
Perv to bid farewell to troops | |||
2007-11-27 | |||
![]()
Musharraf will on Wednesday go to the armyÂ’s general headquarters in Rawalpindi to hand over his position as chief of army staff to his heir apparent, General Ashfaq Kiyani, the spokesman added. Officials said Musharraf would receive a guard of honour during the handover ceremony to Kiyani, the former head of PakistanÂ’s premier spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence.
| |||
Posted by:Steve White |
#10 John Frum, looks like he came in third in his high school's Field Days 100 m. dash. |
Posted by: Chuck Simmins 2007-11-27 21:56 |
#9 ![]() That General Kiyani looks a young Zia Ul Haq. Zia hanged Bhutto, the man who had promoted him above others to Army Chief.... Perv may regret his trust in Kiyani... |
Posted by: john frum 2007-11-27 18:19 |
#8 Nice shiny medals you get there Perv...![]() Any for actually winning something? |
Posted by: john frum 2007-11-27 18:17 |
#7 A Sadat moment, a Zia moment, a Bhutto pere moment. None of them good moments for those departed "leaders"... When Pakistan says "departed leader", they mean it. As is too often the case, the traditional instability of autocracies seems to have coalesced into a discordant yet perverse sympathetic resonance within the MME (Muslim Middle East). While Iraq may have served as some sort of "quantum butterfly", to begin this domino chain reaction, the inherent brittleness of Muslim institutions more likely plays a greater role. Nonetheless, the convergence of political turmoil in Iraq, Iran and, now, Pakistan all present some significant challenges to American military planners. I would love to see Old Patriot's scenario come to pass. While I remain concerned regarding our ability to field the expeditionary force required for such an action, it would send a truly unmistakable message to our other putative "allies"—Saudi Arabia in particular—that no further duplicity will be tolerated. I can only add how—woe beset as Bush's tenure has been—far better that the rather inconvenient advent of this new crisis comes now while there is still some fight left in the White House, rather than having the wave crest during the watch of some spineless democrat. |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-11-27 14:14 |
#6 A Sadat moment, a Zia moment, a Bhutto pere moment. None of them good moments for those departed "leaders"... |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2007-11-27 12:55 |
#5 Actually, having the taliban take over in Pakistan would be a good thing. Then we can quit pretending that Pakistan is an ally, and stomp them into the ground, as many so richly deserve. Attacking south out of Afghanistan and north through a Marine amphibious landing, with India attacking from the east would put a hurt on Pakistan like nothing else every envisioned. The first attack needs to take out the nukes... |
Posted by: Old Patriot 2007-11-27 12:28 |
#4 Osama bin laden is next in the line of succession for Pakistan. |
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2007-11-27 09:47 |
#3 Goooodbye, troops. Helloooooo, ISI! |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-11-27 02:01 |
#2 I think India is gonna miss Musharraf. As are we. |
Posted by: Zhang Fei 2007-11-27 01:35 |
#1 I wonder if he worries about having an Anwar Sadat moment. |
Posted by: Whugum Gonque4662 2007-11-27 00:58 |