| Submit your comments on this article |
| Science & Technology |
| There Once Was a Shark That Ate an Amphibian That Ate a Fish ... |
| 2007-11-28 |
| Posted by:anonymous5089 |
| #9 Even a new specias? of GIANT TRICERATOPS. At this rate, the only thing NORAM = AMERICAS won't have is GODZILLA, MOTHRA or BEAST FROM 20000 FATHOMS FOSSILS - YET [Dragnet/Star Wars Empire theme here]. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-11-28 20:19 |
| #8 Great fleas have litte fleas upon their backs, to bite 'em and little fleas have lesser fleas and so, ad infinitum. |
| Posted by: mojo 2007-11-28 17:11 |
| #7 The fish had died eating a digital watch. http://www.amazon.com/Strata-Terry-Pratchett/dp/0552133256 |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2007-11-28 16:04 |
| #6 The obvious question is What Ate Shark That Ate an Amphibian That Ate a Fish? "Ate" as a metaphoric expression. The critts must have been etombed at that very specific moment, in a fraction of a second. While in water. |
| Posted by: twobyfour 2007-11-28 13:49 |
| #5 She died, of course. At least in the version I read to the trailing daughters, not so long ago. ;-) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2007-11-28 13:25 |
| #4 That's nothing compared to the old lady who had swallowed a horse, which had swallowed a cow, which had swallowed a goat, which had swallowed a dog, which had swallowed a cat, which had swallowed a bird, which had swallowed a spider, which had eaten a fly. She was grotesquely obese, as you well might imagine. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2007-11-28 10:47 |
| #3 I thought it was Mr Garrisons explanation of evil-ution. |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2007-11-28 10:04 |
| #2 A prehistoric turducken! |
| Posted by: Excalibur 2007-11-28 09:13 |
| #1 Today, we call it the primary season. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2007-11-28 08:38 |