You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Mistrial in Muslim Air Force Guard Case
2007-12-04
GREENBELT, Md. (AP) - A federal judge declared a mistrial Monday in the case of a former Andrews Air Force Base security guard accused of failing to include his Muslim name on a background check to hide his ties to an outspoken Washington imam and mosque. U.S. District Judge Deborah Chasanow made the ruling after jurors failed to reach a verdict for Darrick Michael Jackson, who did not put on a defense, after two days of deliberations. Jurors sent a note to the judge Monday afternoon, saying they could ``see no light at the end of the tunnel.''

Jackson, 37, of Washington, was charged with making a false statement for not listing ``Abdul-Jalil Mohammed'' as an alias on the federal form he was required to fill out in 2005. He could have been sentenced to five years in prison if convicted. Jackson's defense was that he did not know he had to include his religious name for the background check he needed to work at the suburban Washington base, which is home to Air Force One. His attorney accused the government of going after the security guard for religious and political reasons.

Prosecutors have argued that Jackson left off the Mohammed name because he feared it would arouse suspicion and scuttle his chances of keeping his job at the base. They highlighted his ties to the Masjid Al-Islam mosque in southeast Washington, as well as some of the inflammatory statements made by Imam Abdul Alim Musa, including Musa's praise for suicide bombers.

Jackson reacted to the judge's decision by thanking God. ``I didn't do anything on purpose,'' he said. ``I don't think I should be here.''
Pure taqiyya.
Marcia Murphy, a spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney's office, said a decision would be made later on whether to retry Jackson.

Juror Eric Smith, 37, said prosecutors failed to prove that Jackson's omission was willful. A majority of jurors wanted to find him not guilty, he said. And despite government claims that religion was not a part of the case, Smith said he wasn't convinced. ``They wanted not to make it about religion, but they ended up making it about religion,'' he said.
That's what worries me. Six years after 9/11 and a lot of our people still don't get it.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  How many more cases is the government going to loose? They just lost the Holy Land Foundation case, too.

They'll lose as many as they can. Half our Government and Academia are owned by the Saudi's, that is where we need to clean house. Should passed through the Magic Kingdom on the way to Afghanistan.
Posted by: Large Sleresh3870   2007-12-04 09:31  

#4  One of the threads in Vanguard of Nazism;: The Free Corps movement in post-war Germany, 1918-1923
by Robert George Leeson Waite is how the Weimar Republic was undermined time and again by German judges who had their own agenda which included a hostility towards the republican government. The ancient regime dies hard. From hell's heart, I stab at thee. For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-12-04 09:19  

#3  As I been saying so frequently: "Lets all get together, and make fun of EUrabia."
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2007-12-04 08:45  

#2  A large part of America thinks Bush trumped up the whole War on Terror thing in order to expand his power and help his friends loot the Treasury. If I recall recent polls correctly, almost half think the Administration was at least complicit in the 9-11 attacks. It is only partially BDS - a big part is due to the legitimate distrust of government in general. It makes sense that the same perception of government would spill over to trial juries. And it won't go away with a Democratic Administration either - some of the names will change, but the theme won't.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-12-04 07:39  

#1  How many more cases is the government going to loose? They just lost the Holy Land Foundation case, too.
Posted by: Pliny Pheath1680   2007-12-04 01:56  

00:00