You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Soldier Charged in Sgt.'s Death in Iraq
2007-12-05
FORT LEWIS, Wash. (AP) - A Fort Lewis soldier has been charged with murder in the death of his platoon sergeant in Iraq, though military investigators do not think the killing was intentional, the Army said Tuesday. Cpl. Timothy Ayers, 21, is accused of shooting Sgt. 1st Class David A. Cooper Jr., who died Sept. 5 in Baghdad. Cooper was 36.

Investigators believe Ayers discharged a pistol in ``wanton disregard for human life'' at Forward Operating Base Falcon. A Fort Lewis spokesman said Army prosecutors do not believe the killing was premeditated or that Ayers intended to kill Cooper.

A pretrial hearing to determine whether there's evidence to support a court-martial is scheduled for Feb. 5 at Fort Lewis. It was not immediately clear if Ayers had an attorney.

When Cooper died, the Defense Department said only that he suffered a non-combat injury that was under investigation. The charge was filed Nov. 8. Fort Lewis released the information after The News Tribune of Tacoma inquired about the investigation. Fort Lewis spokesman Joseph Piek declined Tuesday to provide other details.

Cooper and Ayers were part of the 2nd Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, a unit of the 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division that deployed to Iraq last April on a tour that is to last until this summer.
Posted by:Steve White

#2  Assuming the "pretrial hearing" is an Article 32 hearing, then you're partially correct - the nature of the charges would be stated, (in this case "murder") and the article 32 hearing would determine whether murder charges should go to court martial.

One of the elements of murder under "wanton disregard" is "That the accused knew that death or great bodily harm was a probable consequence of the act;" such knowledge can be proved by circumstantial evidence...
Posted by: SeaLawyer   2007-12-05 16:23  

#1  Shouldn't that be manslaughter then? Or perhaps it is manslaughter and they're reporting it as murder because the reporter doesn't know any better. This is an AP story, after all.
Posted by: gromky   2007-12-05 07:48  

00:00