You have commented 338 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
US jet intercepts ballistic missile for first time: officials
2007-12-05
Posted by:BrerRabbit

#18  See also DEFENSETECH >ORG article on what often/ routinely successful TRIDENT D-5 SLBM TESTING and like means for LT USA = US strategic-geopol policies + US confidence. NUTSHELL > OURS WORKS versus ONLY OURS WORKS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-12-05 23:46  

#17  Frank redefines the word civil. That's why we like 'im.
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-12-05 22:16  

#16  another reason I love the Burg: I'm a "civil" Engineer, no aviator, but I love seeing the back and forth among those who've had to fly/service/love various airframes. Thanks, and continue on :-)
Posted by: Frank G   2007-12-05 18:25  

#15  Three letters come to mind: U.A.V.
Hang AIM-9xx instead of Hellfires and let it loiter at high altitude... Not as sexy as a manned fighter, but the pilot can get up from the console to get a cuppa coffee when needed.
Posted by: Butch Omesh2231   2007-12-05 15:22  

#14  Heh, does kinda extend the range of the AIM-9.
Posted by: Thomas Woof   2007-12-05 14:47  

#13  tu is correct, i forgot about that political decision. not counting those that are 'gate guards' at various military bases. those are already rendered unflyable through various means.
Posted by: USN,Ret.   2007-12-05 14:40  

#12  No boneyard for the Tomcats. Last I heard, they were running F-14's through the shredders to keep the parts away from Iran.
Posted by: tu3031   2007-12-05 12:32  

#11  I would love to see Tomcats pulled out of the desert, but it ain't a'gonna happen; F15's-16's ad -22's stationed in SKOR and Japan mainland would be the way to go. SUppose modifying the USN's Lawn Darts for yet again another mission would involve more porkdollars going to the Lazy B......
Posted by: USN,Ret.   2007-12-05 12:24  

#10  From an F-16. I'm no expert on the area, but perhaps a continued use for the F-14; that is something like an aim-9x guidence system on a phoenix missile or a modern missile with the same basic physical size specs of?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2007-12-05 11:49  

#9  This is good. Even if the fighter doesn't get to the launcher or can't find it in time, it sure as hell can shoot it down still. Just park some F-22s off NKOR about 70 miles and shoot down all their Scuds the next time they want to fire some into the sea as a test.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-12-05 11:37  

#8  What mrp wrote - if they put up enough dummies and camouflage the real sites well enough, it's conceivable that you might not be able to find the launch sites. Until a launch occurs.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2007-12-05 11:18  

#7  Just speculating, but there may be some utility in forcing the launch site to be moved 100 miles away from the coast. It buys time for the ABM system when the missile target is not far away (e.g., A NorK missile fired at Japan or a Chinese missile fired at Taiwan).
Posted by: Darrell   2007-12-05 11:13  

#6  If the launcher is mobile, and well-camoflauged enough, you might not know where it is well enough to take out the launch facility. Nice to have another option to work with.
Posted by: Mike   2007-12-05 10:50  

#5  It's a proof of concept. Talk was of putting this tech into an air launched PAC3 missile.
Posted by: ed   2007-12-05 09:56  

#4  Well, for one thing, if the launch facility is in a country that has not quite declared war. I am in favor of radical preemption starting with burning every copy of the Quran on Earth. But seeing as others look at the situation differently than me there can be legal impediments to attacking launch sites.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-12-05 09:02  

#3  I think because a "hot" missile in the boost phase is a lot easier to target than a "cold", camouflaged launch pad.
Posted by: mrp   2007-12-05 09:02  

#2  Of course in the small print is -

"So it does give us an initial boost phase capability even though it is a much shorter range missile, and you have to be in the area of the missile launch to be effective," Lehner said.

Think about it. If you have enough air superiority to be 'on station' to begin with, why wait till initial boost stage to hit it rather than just take out the launch facility to begin with before there is even a launch.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-12-05 08:50  

#1  Yikes! Rather hard on the jet, to intercept a missile like that. Usually, they use antimissiles...

(yes I know it's the retarded headline writer...journalists aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer)
Posted by: gromky   2007-12-05 07:49  

00:00