You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Muslim sues San Bernardino County over hijab removal
2007-12-07
A Rialto woman backed by the American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against San Bernardino County claiming sheriff's deputies violated her First Amendment rights when they forced her to remove her hijab, a head scarf that also covers the neck and shoulders.

Jameelah Medina, 29, was arrested June 7, 2005, at the Pomona Metrolink station on suspicion of having an invalid train pass, according to the lawsuit, which was filed Wednesday afternoon.

She was taken to West Valley Detention Center in Rancho Cucamonga where her hijab was removed and confiscated for much of the day until her family posted bail. "It's hard to explain how I felt, but the closest words are humiliated, violated, exposed," Medina said at a press conference Thursday at the ACLU Southern California office in Orange County. "I knew that was wrong. I knew I had to fight that."

Medina was on her way to work when she boarded the train in Fontana. When the train reached Claremont, two uniformed officers asked to see her ticket and told her she would have to get off at the Pomona stop, where a sheriff's deputy arrested her, according to the lawsuit.

The deputy, a member of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department's Metrolink Bureau, took Medina to West Valley because "he did not want her in his car all the way to Los Angeles," according to the suit. Medina said she feared for her safety as she sat handcuffed in the back of the squad car.

Deputy Craig Roberts subjected her to bigoted statements, railing about how Muslims support terrorism and how Islam is an "evil religion," she said. "That's when I knew it was serious," she said. "I felt he could take the next exit and take me anywhere and who would know about it?"

The suit names Roberts, San Bernardino County, San Bernardino County Sheriff Gary Penrod and nine other unidentified individuals.

Medina, a Ph.D. student at Claremont Graduate University, is not suing San Bernardino County for money, she said. Instead, she wants to pressure officials to adopt a policy that is respectful of all religious beliefs and resembles policies implemented at correctional facilities elsewhere in California, in other states and at the federal level, said her lawyer, Hector Villagra, director of the ACLU Orange County office.

Medina said it would have been appropriate for female guards to take her to a private area to remove her head scarf and search for weapons and contraband, as is done when she is detained at airports.

San Bernardino County sheriff's spokeswoman Jodi Miller declined to comment on the circumstances of the arrest, though she did say the policy is in place for safety reasons and so accurate photos can be taken for booking. "Anytime anyone is brought into our jail facilities, they are required to take any type of head covering off," she said. "Everyone is asked - whether it's a baseball hat or a scarf."
Posted by:ryuge

#16  How many backhands does it take to remove a hijab from a Ph.D student to dumb enough to purchase a train ticket?
Posted by: Slappy   2007-12-07 20:57  

#15  It's hard to describe how I feel. Disinterested, Unmoved. "Tough shit" covers it pretty well.
Posted by: mojo   2007-12-07 17:08  

#14  A better question, www, is why are they being allowed into the US?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-12-07 15:03  

#13  Why are Muslims being allowed on mass transit? 19 of them slammed three airliners into the World Trade Center in these United States. They placed large numbers of bombs on trains in both Spain and Britain. They are burning cars throughout Europe. They intentionally try to frighten people on airliners in the US.

These people should be labeled for what they are, a death cult and banned from any form of mass transit. Period
Posted by: www   2007-12-07 14:47  

#12  "Medina said it would have been appropriate for female guards to ...and search for weapons and contraband, as is done when she is detained at airports. "

Since this appears that 'interactions' with authorities is not a new thing for her, she is desperately in need of an appointment with Mr. Cluebat.......

Posted by: USN,Ret.   2007-12-07 13:33  

#11  I'm sure there was a time when the ACLU performed a necessary function to the administration of American jurisprudence. I just can't recall precisely when that may have been.

Be that as it may, I trust the judge in this case will advise muzzie Jameelah - in the most sensitive way possible - that if Pope B16 where to be arrested on the same charge as she, that even HE would be required to remove his MITRE, pending release on bond.
Posted by: Mark Z   2007-12-07 13:31  

#10  She says she feels "violated." If I were the judge throwing out here suit, I'd also compel her to attend meetings at a women's shelter and rape crisis center to hear about what actual violation is all about...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2007-12-07 12:40  

#9  Instead, she wants to pressure officials to adopt a policy that is respectful of all religious beliefs...

Maybe they should've just took her out back and stoned her. Maybe hack off a hand...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-12-07 10:03  

#8  FYI, yalmukes come off as well. SO its not an anti-muslim thing, althoguh a grad student thats cheating the transit authority wouldnt have enough graspo of the law to know that she WAS getting equal treatment. This is about the ACLU's "some are more equal than others" approach to the law. FYI, they have yet to defend individual firearm ownership. Ever.
Posted by: OldSpook   2007-12-07 08:57  

#7  Sorry, the hijab comes off, as do 'Bubba' ballcaps, etc.

Matter of "consistent treatment", and officer safety. Like a ballcap, they can be used to conceal things.

Posted by: OldSpook   2007-12-07 08:55  

#6  Walk into your local ACLU office wearing a ski mask and ask to talk with the director. Do you think the first thing going through their minds would be your First Amendment rights?
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-12-07 08:50  

#5  Hopefully the liberal courts don't side with this. Unfortunately, they don't have a good track record for siding with the law.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-12-07 07:09  

#4  What a slut. Typical muzzie following Muhamhead's example of theft. No suprise that the ACLU is behind this crap.
Posted by: Icerigger   2007-12-07 05:41  

#3  Usually you are fined the first time. Obviously, she tries to get free rides on the train often enough to require an arrest.
Posted by: www   2007-12-07 05:34  

#2  Where you are under arrest it means just that, this will be a waste of money all the way around and she will lose.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2007-12-07 03:28  

#1  Basically, she was riding the rails without a ticket and now she wants us to pay her for her little hobo adventure.
Posted by: Whomong Guelph4611   2007-12-07 03:19  

00:00