Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front: Politix | |
Congress's Probe of CIA Tapes Resisted | |
2007-12-15 | |
![]() Congressional leaders from both parties alleged that Justice is trying to block their investigation and vowed to press ahead with hearings. A pair of letters from Justice and CIA officials to leaders of the House and Senate intelligence committees intensified the conflict between the Bush administration and Congress, which is seeking to force current and former CIA leaders to testify as early as next week. The lawmakers want CIA officials to account for the decision to destroy tapes that depicted the use of harsh interrogation tactics on terrorism suspects. The growing feud is the first major confrontation with Congress for new Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, who was narrowly confirmed last month amid controversy over his refusal to describe waterboarding -- a severe interrogation tactic that simulates drowning -- as torture. "We fully appreciate the committee's oversight interest in this matter, but want to advise you of concerns that actions responsive to your request would represent significant risk to our preliminary inquiry," Kenneth L. Wainstein, assistant attorney general for national security, and CIA Inspector General John L. Helgerson wrote in a letter to House intelligence committee leaders. The top Democrat and Republican on the House intelligence committee issued a joint statement that labels Justice's advice to the CIA witnesses an effort to obstruct the congressional probe. "We are stunned that the Justice Department would move to block our investigation," Reps. Silvestre Reyes (D-Tex.) and Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) said in the statement. "Parallel investigations occur all of the time, and there is no basis upon which the Attorney General can stand in the way of our work." They vowed to "use all the tools available to Congress, including subpoenas" to compel the to CIA to produce documents and require key officials to testify about the tapes.
Mukasey wrote to the lawmakers that Justice "has a long-standing policy of declining to provide non-public information about pending matters. "This policy is based in part on our interest in avoiding any perception that our law enforcement decisions are subject to political influence," Mukasey wrote to lawmakers. | |
Posted by:Steve White |
#5 Oly way to make it any better is get CIA vs State into the mix |
Posted by: OldSpook 2007-12-15 12:17 |
#4 I'm popping as fast as I can, 'moose. ;-p |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2007-12-15 11:05 |
#3 Congress attacking the CIA? That's almost like al-Qaeda attacking the Taliban. Where's my popcorn? |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2007-12-15 10:29 |
#2 I hope Justice rips the CIA apart. |
Posted by: OldSpook 2007-12-15 10:25 |
#1 Let them investigate. AS long as they also investigate why |
Posted by: Mike N. 2007-12-15 02:59 |