You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Assad: We turned down nuclear arms offer in 2001
2007-12-20
Syria received an offer of nuclear weapons six years ago, but is not interested in such arms or in a nuclear reactor, Syrian President Bashar Assad said in an interview published yesterday in the Austrian newspaper Die Presse.
"Hey buddy, wanna buy a nuke? Cheap! 20 kilotons and everything!"
"At the beginning of 2001, someone brought us a letter from a certain Khan. We did not know if the letter was genuine or a forgery by Israel to lure us into a trap. In any case, we rejected [the approach]. We were not interested in having nuclear weapons or a nuclear reactor. We never met Khan."
Of course not. Your Dire Enemy™ has nuclear weapons but you don't want them. Having nuclear weapons would make you big heat in the Middle East, but you don't want them. Having nuclear weapons would have the Y'urp-peons and the IAEA licking your boots, but you don't want them. Course not. That doesn't even make sense in an Islamic way.
Abdul Qadeer Khan masterminded Pakistan's nuclear program, and has admitted selling nuclear technology to Iran, Libya, and North Korea.

Regarding Syria's response to the September 6 Israeli attack on an unidentified target in its area, Assad said that Syria has a right to response to that attack, but hinted that it would not do so. "We could have responded to the IAF strike by firing a missile, but it would have given Israel an excuse to start a war, and we did not want that," Assad said.
"Please don't kick our asses!"
"This was a military facility under construction. Since it was a military facility, I can't give details. But that does not mean that this was a nuclear facility."
So now even Pencilneck has to admit that it wasn't a baby milk factory.
Western analyses of satellite imagery of the site indicated it may have concealed a nuclear reactor under construction similar to one of North Korean design. In subsequent images, Syria appeared to have quickly razed the structure.

Assad called for Syrian-Israeli peace talks to resume, as follow-up to the Annapolis Conference, and claimed that negotiations could be completed quickly. He said that Syria and Israel had gone 80 percent of the way toward peace in negotiations over returning the Golan Heights, before the talks collapsed in 2000, and that the remaining 20 percent could be completed within a few weeks, and a Golan withdrawal within six months. "Now a referee is needed - the United States above all, naturally with support from the European Union and United Nations," he said. "But without the U.S., nothing will work."
You need us to twist the Israelis' arms. We need you for ... what, exactly?
Syria sent its deputy foreign minister, Fayssal Mekdad, to Annapolis, where he emphasized the need for Israel to leave the Golan. Assad said in his interview that it is necessary to continue the effort begun at the conference. "If a plane starts and reduces speed, it will crash," Assad said "Annapolis was a one-day event. It all depends on the efforts afterward. We have to be optimistic, but cautious."

The Syrian track is slated to be discussed at the conference the Russians will host in Moscow in the first part of 2008. Details of that gathering remain vague, but senior Spanish officials told Haaretz last week that including Syria in the peace process guarantees success on the Palestinian track as well.
How, unless Iran and Syria admit that they're holding the Paleo leash these days?
Syria traditionally maintains that the peace process must advance under American auspices. Assad repeated that stance yesterday, but was skeptical that George Bush's administration would be in a position to sponsor talks during an election year.

He also insinuated that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert cannot advance peace because he is "weaker than any prime minister before him."
Can't argue with that.
Assad rejected the claim made in Israel that Syria supports "radical movements" like Hamas and Hezbollah. "Whether Hamas is radical or not, they are strong. Therefore one has to talk to Hamas. Without them, there will be neither stability nor peace," he said, adding that the same goes for Hezbollah in Lebanon.
"They're not radical in an Islamic way," he added.
Regarding ties with Iran, Assad said that Syria would support whoever advances its interests and goals. "Iran is a very important country - whether you like it or not," he said, and stability in the Middle East is not possible without it.
Posted by:john frum

#3  Actually its not all that implausible that the Mossad sent Assad a feeler, claiming to be a note from AQ Khan - I mean what do they have to lose if its found out, its not like theyre actually gonna give him a bomb, its legit to try to see what his reaction his - Pakis would be mad at the Mossad, but who gives a damn about that? And if Assad DOES take the bait, well now hes been found out - sort of.

And its ALSO plausible, that Assad might just get nervous, and turn down the bait, without stronger proof that it was genuine.

None of which indicates that Assad wouldnt have loved to REALLY get a nuke, just that he was cautious about responding to a letter that couldnt be verified.

I take it Assad doesnt invest in Nigerian get rich quick schemes either - doesnt mean he doesnt want to get rich quick.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2007-12-20 15:46  

#2  If you are a thirdworld nutjob the way to get nukes (a) buy them (b) test them to convince everyone you have them (c) Develop your own.

Everyone starts with C which leaves them vunerable.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-12-20 11:37  

#1  IRANIAN.WS/TOPIX > ASSAD: NO ME STABILITY WITHOUT IRAN. USA should also stop isolating = punishing SYRIA for its alliance wid Iran.

Also from IRANIAN.WS > RUSSIA, IRAN, AND NUCLEAR FUEL.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-12-20 00:33  

00:00