You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
US gave Bhutto 'steady streamÂ’ of threat info
2008-01-01
WASHINGTON - The United States provided a steady stream of intelligence to Benazir Bhutto about threats against her before the former Pakistani prime minister was assassinated and advised her aides on how to boost security, although key suggestions appear to have gone unheeded, US officials said.

Senior US diplomats had multiple conversations, including at least two private face-to-face meetings, with top members of BhuttoÂ’s Pakistan PeopleÂ’s Party to discuss threats on the Pakistani opposition leaderÂ’s life and review her security arrangements after a suicide bombing marred her initial return to Pakistan from exile in October, the officials told The Associated Press on Monday. The intelligence was also shared with the Pakistani government, the officials said.
Which meant that a fair bit of the intel was passed on to the Talibs and al-Qaeda ...
Much of what was passed on dealt with general threats from Taleban extremists and Al Qaeda sympathizers and “was not actionable information.”

The officials said Bhutto and her aides were concerned, particularly after the October attack, but were adamant that in the absence of a specific and credible threat there would be few, if any, changes to her campaign schedule ahead of parliamentary elections.
That's the real problem, isn't it: if you alter your behavior in the face of vague threats, you're no longer who you were. If you were the head of a political movement and you run for cover each time there is a threat, pretty soon you're useless as the leader of the movement.
“She knew people were trying to assassinate her,” said an intelligence official. “We don’t hold information back on possible attacks on foreign leaders and foreign countries.” The official added, however, that while the US could share the information, “it’s up to (the recipient) how they want to take action.”

“We gave them a steady stream of intelligence,” one official said.

In the meetings with US officials, Bhutto aides did not ask the United States to help protect her but did inquire about the feasibility of hiring private US or British bodyguards, an idea discouraged by the Americans who argued that a noticeable Western security detail would increase the threat and might become a target itself, the officials said.
Reasonable concern, unfortunately.
Instead, the US diplomats recommended as many as five reputable local Pakistani and regional firms that could be contracted to supplement BhuttoÂ’s security and urged the party to limit the size, scope and type of her public appearances, upgrade armoring on vehicles in which she might travel and require her to wear protective clothing, the officials said.

However, there was no indication that BhuttoÂ’s team - including her husband, Asif Ali Zardari, who attended at least one of the meetings - had followed through on the most critical of the recommendations, including the hiring of private guards and reducing her visibility in large crowds like the one in Rawalpindi where she was killed.
Rawalpindi being an army garrison town, one would have hoped she would have been slightly safer there.
The officials said Zardari rejected using private Pakistani security companies due to fears they might be infiltrated by extremists even though several of the recommended companies have international components and are used by Western embassies to protect personnel.
Both statements may be true ...
Anne Tyrell, a spokeswoman for the private US security company Blackwater Worldwide, known for its operations in Iraq, said her company had been approached about possibly providing protection for Bhutto, “but unfortunately, an agreement was never reached.”

While BhuttoÂ’s staff did take some steps to improve the safety of the partyÂ’s vehicles, the officials expressed surprise that the car in which she was riding when attacked had a sunroof and stressed that they would have strongly advised her against popping her head out of it in the presence of large numbers of people.

In addition to advising BhuttoÂ’s aides, as they worked to forge a political reconciliation and possible power-sharing deal between the opposition leader and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, the US diplomats made numerous appeals to the Pakistani government to grant requests from her party to ensure BhuttoÂ’s safety, the officials said. But some requests, such as those for advanced technology and massive police presences in outlying towns, either could not be met or were deemed unreasonable by the government, a position the United States reluctantly conceded, the officials said.
Exactly why would a 'massive police presence' be unreasonable? Next to Perv himself, she was the most marked person in all of Pakland.
The State Department, meanwhile, angrily denied suggestions that US officials had ignored or minimized the threat to Bhutto even as they were encouraging reconciliation between her and Musharraf. “It is simply untrue and I simply do not understand why anyone, anywhere would assert that the United States did not have concerns, minimized those concerns, or was not very active in trying to ensure that she was provided with whatever kind of security support she required,” deputy spokesman Tom Casey told reporters.

“We discussed those concerns regularly both with her and officials from her party and with President Musharraf and with his government,” he said. “We always, in every instance, took those concerns seriously. We were very active in trying to ensure that any information we had that was relevant to her situation was passed on to her as well as those responsible for her security.”
Posted by:

#7  She knew she was going into the lions' den. That was not the first attempt.

That being said, it is amazing how many people I have heard essentially say what a clean cut well behaved person she was - didn't make any enemies during her career, nope no way.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2008-01-01 15:32  

#6  From all the news and comments, I get the distinct feeling the overall opinion is "Good Ridance".
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-01-01 13:41  

#5  And there it is. She wanted a US Security firm protection, Blackwater or the British Aegis, but our beloved State Department pointed her back at the domestic brands. Nicely done US State donks. Nicely done indeed.
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-01-01 13:04  

#4  The US doesn't always do a good job picking horses -- this nag being a case in point.
Posted by: Iblis   2008-01-01 12:56  

#3  I liked it she was a woman and that in itself pissed off most of the people who needing pissing off. Otherwise, no big loss. Bhutto, her clan and that whole way of doing business are fifty percent of the reason Pakistan is the sh*thole it is today. The other fifty percent being, of course, islam.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-01-01 10:10  

#2  The only thing she stood for that I agreed with was pro-life. She was a corrupt, unrepentant fascisti type politician who had the backbone of a worm.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2008-01-01 05:31  

#1  This seems to be another "man bites dog" ho-hum story. So - every morning the US told her:

You are a target for assassination.
You should not go out exposing yourself in large mobs.
You might be shot, or blown up.
There are people out there who want to kill you.

So what else was new, every day since she stepped off the plane?

If this is "news," then might as well devote some "above the fold" space to http://www.theonion.com/content/node/45792
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2008-01-01 03:20  

00:00