You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Forget Global Warming. Soil Erosion is a Bigger Threat!
2008-01-11
Top Science Story of 2007 # 61. Quantifying Global Warming is #21.
Earth is running out of soil. At least thatÂ’s the conclusion of a new study supporting the long-held belief that current farming practices are causing soil to erode more quickly than new soil can be produced.

The best way to measure the effects of farming is a before-and-after comparison of soil erosion on the same kind of land, looking at both cultivated and wild-growing areas. David R. Montgomery of the University of Washington compiled the data and published his findings last August. On average, he found, plowed land erodes at slightly more than 1 millimeter per year, while new soil builds up at about 0.2 millimeter per year. Montgomery calculates that cultivated soil becomes exhausted, depending on original thickness, within 500 to several thousand years—a number correlating reasonably well with the life spans of civilizations around the world.

“Soil erosion is one of the least appreciated but most important environmental challenges we face,” Montgomery says. “It’s every bit as important as global warming. And part of the problem with both these things is the slow timescales over which problems accumulate.”
Posted by:Bobby

#11  Global warming loses its cachet, and the greenreds already have this one in the chamber.

Gotta admire their organizational skills.
Posted by: no mo uro   2008-01-11 22:09  

#10  One of the fastest ways to improve arid, alkaline soil was discovered some years ago: Styrofoam peanuts. When plowed into desert soil, they act as catch basins for water, but don't inhibit drainage.

This allows decomposition fertilizers the moisture to do their job--which otherwise would either run off or drain away. Farmers can use much less water in the process. After a time, the microorganisms tend to acidify the soil.

The peanuts also tend to loosen the soil.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-01-11 18:24  

#9  Well, if we want to catch up with Volcano's, we'll need to start dumping lots more CO2 into the atmosphere.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2008-01-11 18:10  

#8  So which is the bigger danger - an atmosphere composed completely of carbon dioxide or the entire planet eroding way? 'Cause I'd hate to waste my time worrying about the wrong thing.
Posted by: SteveS   2008-01-11 17:59  

#7  If you're in my neighborhood, stop by for some lemons & satsumas (tangerines) - still a good number on the two trees, so take a sack. All natural, all organic (no fertilizer and no pesticide - don't seem to need it.)
Posted by: Glenmore   2008-01-11 17:21  

#6  Victory. Garden.
Google dat.
Posted by: eLarson   2008-01-11 16:45  

#5  Start your own garden for fresh veggies.

What a radical concept man. So simple most people probably missed that one. When I was a kid my mother always had a small garden in the back yard of our suburban house. It made as much as we could consume, and I remember her canning various things besides.
Posted by: Bill Phuns5250   2008-01-11 16:01  

#4  Or start your own garden for fresh veggies.

Word!

Google square foot gardening.
Posted by: twobyfour   2008-01-11 14:58  

#3  No pesticides mean that in order to get the same yield of traditional farming, you have to plant about 1/3 more crops. Since they don't use 'chemical fertilizers', they have to use manure. This increases the health risk to the public for E. Coli and other diseases and they also leave alot of salts in the soil which then have to be flushed with more water. And since organic pesticides and fungicides are less efficient, you have to use about 7 times as much and those also pose a health risk in and of themselves. And since you have to plant more acres with less hardy types of plants, you have to water more often as well. So they use more land, far more water and have increased risk of disease transfer to humans. Add to that, many of these farms are in water starved areas such as California, the relative amount of resources they are using far exceeds any supposed benefit.

And if you think you're sticking it to big business by buying organic foods, take a close look at who is producing it. It's another cash cow for the big corps, which you know, is just capitalism:)

So if all you are after is the taste difference, try to find the local farmers so you can skip out the long transit times from field to table. Or start your own garden for fresh veggies.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2008-01-11 13:59  

#2  Why is organic farming more damaging, Silentbrick?
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-01-11 13:28  

#1  Actually soil erosion is a big concern in the geologic community. And all these wackjobs and their 'organic foods' make it far worse. Organic farming is about 3 times more damaging than normal. Don't EVER mention organic farming around my professors, unless you want a profanity laced lecture;)
Posted by: Silentbrick   2008-01-11 13:09  

00:00