You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
Canada sacks nuclear watchdog over reactor closure
2008-01-17
Posted by:Anguper Hupomosing9418

#8  "Omar Alghabra of the Liberals..."

there you have it in a nutshell....
Posted by: Helmuth, Speaking for Slort7648   2008-01-17 12:50  

#7  Canada is the US's sole supplier of these isotopes, delaying local heart scans and other crucial medical tests because the supply ran dry. The environmentalists are probably responsible for this as they have allowed no new nuclear plants to be built, whether for power or not. I think we are being very short-sighted by being so dependent upon foreign suppliers and investment and need to rebuild America so we can be independent and self-sufficient regardless of how the wind changes direction around the world.
Posted by: Danielle   2008-01-17 09:54  

#6  Sounds like a "Good" Firing. (Dumbass)
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-01-17 09:50  

#5  Wow. PIMF is my friend. Sorry for the wretched grammar, etc.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-01-17 09:33  

#4  While the snark is appreciated, Rantburgers should understand Chalk River is a research reactor, not a reactor generating nuclear power (we have a number of this at Pickering just outside Toronto). The closure was mishandled because not because "radioactivity is dangerous" but because closing the reactor without thinking through the consequences meant cancer patients risked doing without the medical isotopes Chalk River was producing. Closing the reactor caused risk to life and hence the firing.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-01-17 09:32  

#3  Hard to tell what is really going on here. Sounds to me like the reactor had seen its day and was rightly shut down. Who knows.
Posted by: Icerigger   2008-01-17 09:28  

#2  Like solar radiation. How many people die every year from skin cancer created by sun exposure? Government needs to get a control on that too. I'm sure someone can gen up some numbers on the cost and work days lost to society and government caused by ignoring this danger. Just need to motivate ignorant journalists and MSM talking heads people to spread panic the word.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-01-17 07:13  

#1  But - radiation! It's bad! How could anyone be against de-radiating our environment? A real government would shut down all radioactivity, and ban it from ever entering the country.
Posted by: gromky   2008-01-17 01:52  

00:00