You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Slimes Endorses HRC, McCain
2008-01-25
The New York Times editorial board has endorsed Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and John McCain in the presidential primary race.

In editorials posted Thursday on the newspaper's Web site, the board argued forcefully on Clinton's behalf, while saying that McCain, R-Ariz., was the best of a flawed GOP field with which the board had "strong disagreements."

The board said its case for Clinton, D-N.Y., was based on more than her accomplishments, adding that the senator "sometimes overstates the importance of resume."

"Hearing her talk about the presidency, her policies and answers for America's big problems, we are hugely impressed by the depth of her knowledge, by the force of her intellect and by the breadth of, yes, her experience," it said.

The board also spoke favorably of Clinton's main rival for the Democratic nomination, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, calling him "incandescent." But it concluded that "we need more specifics to go with his amorphous promise of a new governing majority, a clearer sense of how he would govern."

"Voters have to judge candidates not just on the promise they hold, but also on the here and now."
Posted by:Bobby

#9  EU has a special on eyeball Brillo, Raj.... ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-01-25 19:41  

#8  They could almost run on the same ticket if they could figure out who gets to be on top.

That's a rather disturbing visual, dude...
Posted by: Raj   2008-01-25 18:37  

#7  Indeed we need Gus Hall back, a man's mench.
Posted by: Thomas Woof   2008-01-25 15:24  

#6  Not a dime's worth of difference between them. They could almost run on the same ticket if they could figure out who gets to be on top.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2008-01-25 12:34  

#5  To quote Deacon quote Heinlein..

Here's the rest of Robert Heinlein's advice.
“If this is too blind for your taste, consult some well-meaning fool (there is always one around) and ask his advice. Then vote the other way. This enables you to be a good citizen (if such is your wish) without spending the enormous amount of time on it that truly intelligent exercise of franchise requires.”
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2008-01-25 11:53  

#4  Jim Geraghty at National Review:

I'm really curious - do the editors of the New York Times know how much damage they did John McCain by endorsing him? Not just by endorsing him, but by citing every single time he's disagreed with conservatives? . . . This sentence jumped out at me:

Mr. McCain was one of the first prominent Republicans to point out how badly the war in Iraq was being managed. We wish he could now see as clearly past the temporary victories produced by Mr. BushÂ’s unsustainable escalation, which have not led to any change in IraqÂ’s murderous political calculus. At the least, he owes Americans a real idea of how he would win this war, which he says he can do. We disagree on issues like reproductive rights and gay marriage.

The victories of the surge are "temporary." The New York Times says so, because they have a crystal ball.

McCain would be well served by declaring, "Those surrender-now defeatists on the editorial board can take their endorsement and cram it."
Posted by: Mike   2008-01-25 10:53  

#3  The NYT wants a liberal in the White House. Maybe we will get lucky and the NYTs will go belly up before Billary gets in the White House.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-01-25 10:52  

#2  Why do you think they endorsed both??
Posted by: lotp   2008-01-25 09:07  

#1  Aren't they basically the same person? What are they going to do when Romney takes Florida ans wins super tuesday?
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2008-01-25 09:06  

00:00