You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Oh, goody! Just what we need! Nader '08!
2008-01-30
[/sarcasam]
Posted by:Mike

#13  Hey, anyone know where I can get a fan belt for my Corvair?

Actualy yes, but be sure to get the later "Deep Groove" Idler pulleys to keep it from flipping over.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-01-30 22:41  

#12  Aw right, Ralf Nader! He'll help us stick it to the Man.

Hey, anyone know where I can get a fan belt for my Corvair?
Posted by: SteveS   2008-01-30 22:15  

#11  If Obama beats Hillary Nader won't run, he wont' have a chance.
If Hillary beats Obama Nader will run and get fairly decent numbers. It may mean a split in the party that has been long in the coming.

Ron Paul may go independent but he's faded already. The bulk of his followers will disappear or link up with someone else.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-01-30 20:38  

#10  Iff 9-11/WOT > WAR FOR THE DEFEAT, DESTRUCTION + SUBORNMENT OF THE USA, then anti-Amer agendists must make their move BEFORE US REGIONAL-GLOBAL ENTRENCHMENT "AS IS" BECOMES TOO STRONG TO MILPOL DEFEAT. TIME WORKS BOTH WAYS - the longer the US-West stays, expands, andor entrenches around the world, the greater the risk of ISOLATION + IMPLOSION FOR ANTI-US/WESTERN -ISMS AND NATIONS.

OWG-NWO > A PAN-DIMENSION WORLD REVOLUTION IS GOING ON, and the USA IS THE CATALYST thanx to 9-11.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-01-30 19:33  

#9  Okay, I'll bite, didn't NEWSMAX/OTHERS > WILL NEWT GINGRICH BE THE GOP DARK HORSE???

And lets NOT forget JEB BUSH - Various Netters are NOT convinced he's out for 2008 despite rhetoric/claims to the contrary???

Broadly speeeking, A DEMOCRAT WIN in 2008 can be interpreted as that the US HAS DE FACTO WON THE WAR IN IRAQ-ME AND WILL PROCEED WID REGIONAL-GLOBAL ENTRENCHMENT = IRAQ/ME NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT + CONTRUX AS BEGUN BY DUBYA-GOP, + FOCII ON US-SPECIFIC, GOVT-EMPIRE, REGULATION-WELFARIST CENTRIC NATIONAL STABILITY BACK IN CONUS.

IOW, SPEND SPEND SPEND, for NAT-GLOBAL [Unitary] SOCIALISM + GLOBAL ANGLO-US = ANGLO-WEST DEMOSOC EMPIRE???

2008 then > YEAR when Cold War Leftists-Marxists have to decide on tradional ANTI-AMER/WESTERNISM versus PRO-US/WESTERN, PRO-CAPITALISM UNITARIAN SOCIALISM = "NEW ASIANISM-ORIENTALISM"???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-01-30 19:25  

#8  I'm fuzzy on the details (that was a loooonnnng time ago), Darrell, but I think Harold Stassen at least had some morals. And a modicum of brains.

(And, apparently, an ego the size of a house.)
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-01-30 18:58  

#7  I think we're going to need him to run, to balance things if the other side persuades someone like Paul to go third-party. I think its going to be close.

Nader did win it for us in 2000 after all.
Posted by: buwaya   2008-01-30 18:22  

#6  Harold Stassen comes to mind.
Posted by: Darrell   2008-01-30 17:34  

#5  he could do damage, but to the Donks.
Posted by: Frank G   2008-01-30 17:29  

#4  If he could get the disappointed Edwards and Kucinich and Ron Paul constituencies to rally to him, he could pick up, oh, dozens! of votes.
Posted by: Mike   2008-01-30 16:52  

#3  If Clinton gets the nomination, I bet he'll definetely run.
Posted by: danking70   2008-01-30 16:37  

#2  How come Ralphie Boy never gets painted as deluded egomaniac?
Posted by: tu3031   2008-01-30 16:07  

#1  Oh freakin' joy.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-01-30 15:41  

00:00