You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Senator Reid's Remarks on Tet Offensive
2008-02-02
Harry was nice enough to send me an e-mail version of this. Has Harry cracked?
Senator Harry Reid made the following statement today on the floor of the U.S. Senate to commemorate the victories of the U.S. forces during the Tet Offensive in Vietnam:

Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery:

“Mr. President, I rise today, the 40th anniversary of the beginning of the Tet Offensive, to commemorate the valor and courageousness with which our Armed Forces fought to repel this massive attack.

“Over the holiday recess, I was fortunate enough to spend a great deal of time in my home state of Nevada. While at home, I met with several Veterans at the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 1753 in Las Vegas. After talking with them for quite a while, it was brought to my attention that we were only a few weeks away from the 40th anniversary of the onset of the Tet Offensive. In order to ensure that the heroism of our troops who fought in these arduous battles was not overlooked on this milestone anniversary, I told my friends at VFW Post 1753 that I would honor their sacrifices and the sacrifices of their fellow Nevadans and call attention to this important occasion on the floor of the United States Senate.

“From a tactical standpoint, the Tet Offensive would result in one of America’s most convincing victories over the combined forces of the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army (NVA), yet few Americans recall the decisiveness with which our troops routed the surprise onslaught. Many mistakenly believe that Tet was a military defeat, significant for the enemy’s ability to launch a large-scale attack on the U. S. and South Vietnamese forces. It is time to correct this mistaken impression and recognize the bravery and sacrifice of our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines in achieving victory during the Tet Offensive.

“As many Hollywood films have since immortalized, the surprise attacks began in full during the early morning hours of January 31, 1968, the Vietnamese lunar New Year holiday known as Tet. A few months earlier, the governments of North and South Vietnam had agreed to observe a seven-day truce from January 27 to February 3, 1968, in honor of the national holiday. With the Tet Truce abruptly violated, America’s servicemembers regrouped to defend what would be the largest military operation conducted by either side up to that point in the conflict.

“Withstanding major assaults at Hue, Khe Sanh, and Saigon, our Armed Forces quickly turned the tide on the surprise offensive and delivered major tactical blows to both the Viet Cong and NVA. Most of the attack had been successfully repelled by mid-February with few notable exceptions, such as fighting at the coastal port of Hue, which continued into early March. When the dust settled, tens of thousands of Communist troops had died during the massive ambush, while 1,536 U.S. and non-Vietnamese allies perished in the violence and over 7,700 others were wounded or declared missing.

“Despite America’s impressive tactical victories in the aftermath of the original attacks, the Tet Offensive forever altered the course of the Vietnam War. Although the Tet Offensive would serve as a major blow in the court of American public opinion, we must never forget the resolve and bravery of our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines, who fought a determined enemy and defended the freedoms of those who could not defend themselves.

“During the difficult times of today, when America remains at war abroad against another committed enemy, I believe we must all remember to take the necessary time and pay our deepest respects to those servicemembers who have fallen in years past. I certainly will never forget the 151 Nevadans who died during the course of the entire Vietnam War, many of whom would meet their eventual fate defending the South during the Tet Offensive. To all of those valiant Americans who fought during this mightiest of struggles, our nation is eternally grateful for your sacrifice in turning what could have been one of our darkest hours into yet another great victory in the annals of our nation’s rich military history.”
Posted by:Bobby

#7  TW dearest, off topic, who were you refering to on this thread?
Posted by: RD   2008-02-02 18:30  

#6  Fascinating how, after dwelling so lovingly on military accomplishments of the veterans he stood up to honour, he gives a one-sentence gloss of the American public's opinion change. He'll get an interesting response to his next visit to a VFW post.
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-02-02 18:14  

#5  Hairy is in deep do-do with the locals. Now he is kissing butt to save his own.
Posted by: www   2008-02-02 17:56  

#4  Actually, P2k, there was quite a bit of intelligence that indicated a German offensive in the Ardennes but it was dismissed by high command.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2008-02-02 17:34  

#3  Aùerica was not defeated in Vietnam but in the media.

While we are at it: in the second half of the forties the Communists made a conceted effort to take over Hollywood for its role as shaper of public opinion. However they wereclumsy enough to be detected, create an opposition (Regan didn't like to be threatened being throwed acid in the face) and after a series of iron bar fights between the Comunist actors and scenarists aginst the others it ended with the so called Witch Hunt.

Now if the Communists tried to infiltrate Holywood wouln't have been logical to infiltrate the MSM as a much more powerful level on American public opinion?
Posted by: JFM   2008-02-02 15:43  

#2  Despite AmericaÂ’s impressive tactical victories in the aftermath of the original attacks, the Tet Offensive forever altered the course of the Vietnam War. Although the Tet Offensive would serve as a major blow in the court of American public opinion...

Geez, Harry. Think that might be an important history lesson to remember?
Posted by: tu3031   2008-02-02 14:59  

#1  Tet was the wakeup for a very young man, myself that what today is called the Main Stream Media [MSM] had become as much a threat as a defender of the republic. That is when Walter Cronkite who up till then I had admired pronounced the effort in Vietnam futile.

For I understood Cronkite had been there in Europe in December 1944 when the 'defeated' Germans launched a surprise offensive in the Ardennes of Belgium. The war was about to be over. The Germans were on the run. Or so our political and military leaders let the American public believe. Our intelligence services detected no action upon the enemy's part to commit itself to this massive assault. The Germans had resorted to hand carried communications in preparation, thus nullifying Ultra, the Allied decryption efforts. The bitter woods of southern Belgium would see the virtual destruction of the 106th US Infantry Division and the largest surrender of American forces since the Philippines in 1942 . It would result in 81,000 KIA casualties, greater than the entire Vietnam War. The fighting went on for nearly two months on the ground the Germans would contest. In the end, the enemy gained no ground and suffered crippling destruction of manpower and equipment. No where in the record of those events have I found where Mr. Cronkite, as a reporter in theater, make the same evaluation of the American effort there as he would concerning Tet and the work in Vietnam. Yet the military results of both offensives upon the enemy were the same. However, the military loses to the Americans and its allies in both battles were substantially less in the second. Here was a man who was an 'authoritative' observer to both acts, yet his reporting was without question compromised by personal bias over facts.

As more time passes and more historians of the classical school with far less bias and far more critical analytical skill come to write the history of the 20th Century, the judgment upon the popular chroniclers of contemporary news will be adjudged and that judgment is likely not one they will be proud of. .

Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-02-02 13:10  

00:00