You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
US military charges two more Gitmo captives
2008-02-10
US military prosecutors filed war crimes charges against two more Guantanamo prisoners on Friday, saying one was an Al Qaeda videographer and the other one a driver and bodyguard for Osama bin Laden. That brings to seven the number of captives charged in the revised system of military tribunals created to try non-US citizens held at the US Navy base in southeast Cuba as part of the Bush administrationÂ’s war against terrorism.

The charges say that Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman al Bahlul, a 39-year-old Yemeni, was bin LadenÂ’s personal media secretary and occasional bodyguard, who created a recruiting video glorifying the bombing of the USS Cole. Seventeen US sailors were killed when Al Qaeda militants attacked the ship as it was docked in Yemen in 2000.

Prosecutors also say al Bahlul made martyrdom videotapes styled as wills for two of the Sept 11 hijackers and helped research the economic impact of the attacks they launched against the United States.

Military prosecutors say that a Sudanese prisoner, Ibrahim Mahmoud al Qosi, 47, was an armed guard and driver for bin Laden and provided logistical support for an Al Qaeda compound in Afghanistan where he lived from 1998 to 2001. He fought on the front lines as part of a mortar crew in Kabul and helped Al Qaeda forces flee into the Tora Bora mountains after US forces invaded Afghanistan in 2001, according to the charges.

The men are charged with conspiring with Al Qaeda to attack and murder civilians. Al Bahlul is also charged with solicitation to commit murder and providing material support for terrorism. Both face life in prison if convicted and both had been charged in the first Guantanamo court system. Those charges were dropped when the US Supreme Court struck down that version in 2006, before their trials started.
Posted by:Fred

00:00