You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Aussies turn big guns on Taliban
2008-02-28
AUSTRALIAN troops have been forced to use some of their heaviest firepower to fight Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan during a series of recent skirmishes, the Department of Defence says. The soldiers have been using 81mm mortars, which can hit targets kilometres away but which have not been widely used by Australia since the Vietnam war. No Australian soldiers were killed or injured in the fighting and it was not clear if any Taliban had been hit.

The Taliban have launched multiple simultaneous attacks during the past fortnight. The raids have been aimed at a security post that soldiers from the Reconstruction Task Force (RTF) have been building about 15km from Tarin Kowt, in the Afghan province of Oruzgan. Chief of Defence Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston praised the work of the soldiers. "The immediate and aggressive response by RTF soldiers caused the enemy to break off their attack and abandon their weapons in hastily prepared caches. These (weapons) were recovered through aggressive follow-up patrolling, which was sustained for a number of days."

Defence edited video footage of the skirmishes shows a digger clawing his way through dirt to uncover a hessian bag filled with weapons and ammunition. The soldier counts eight rounds of ammunition in a waistbelt pulled from the bag. The video also shows diggers visiting nearby villages to ask locals if they have seen any Taliban soldiers.

Defence spokesman Andrew Nikolic said the Taliban had quickly stashed their weapons before fleeing. "They're riding motorbikes so they have quick transport," Brigadier Nikolic said.

Australia has about 1000 troops in Afghanistan, including Special Air Service soldiers, who are working at the front line of the war against the Taliban and criminal elements attempting to push western armies out of the central Asian nation. Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon has called on NATO, which is leading the operation in Afghanistan, to send more of its soldiers to the front line to support US, Canadian and Australian troops already there.

US-based private intelligence company Stratfor says the Taliban are fighting an "effective and intensive" insurgency that would be difficult to beat.

"The United States, its allies and the Kabul government are fighting a holding action strategically," it said today. "They do not have the force to destroy the Taliban and in counterinsurgency, the longer the insurgents maintain their operational capability, the more likely they are to win."
Posted by:Fred

#7  AC: Good on ya!
Posted by: Thorgrim the Obnoxious   2008-02-28 18:40  

#6  Now, THIS is a big gun, you defeatist wankers:






(280mm "Atomic Annie" firing on the Nevada test range, 1953)
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2008-02-28 15:58  

#5  I prefer an aluminum overcast, with heavy, scattered Rockeye to big guns, my self.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-02-28 14:30  

#4  What a ridiculous hit-piece. The 81mm mortar is not a "big gun" by any reasonable standard. It is a man-portable infantry weapon. The Australian army has 155mm howitzers, which would reasonably be "big guns" in the current context. I initially thought this might be what the headline referred to.

The exaggeration of a particular weapon's significance is a familiar trope in the Oz-left media, as when they attached great significance to the replacement of B-52s with B-1s in a routine Iraq support rotation. Here, the obvious objective is to portray the allies as so hard-pressed that they are resorting to massive and unprecedented weapons in their desperation to hold the line.
Btw, the Taliban are known to use 120mm mortars and 122mm rockets, both significantly more powerful than the 81mm.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2008-02-28 11:38  

#3  It's hard to tell news.com.au and the dailytimes.com.pk apart.
Posted by: ed   2008-02-28 08:24  

#2  Why would it be surprising if the Talibs were able to mount such an insurgency? We know that the salafist groups withdrew much of their manpower, money and arms from Iraq last year in response to the surge and to new opposition by Iraqi tribes.

Those assets didn't go home to Mama - they went looking for another place in which to defeat the kufir. And where better than in Afghan, where the Euros were doing their best to signal "take the money, take the country, just don't hurt me" ??
Posted by: lotp   2008-02-28 07:01  

#1   "US-based private intelligence company Stratfor says the Taliban are fighting an "effective and intensive" insurgency that would be difficult to beat."

Humm... They wouldn't happen to know Alan Greenspan, by any chance, would they?
Posted by: MB   2008-02-28 03:16  

00:00