You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Lawmakers take aim at CEO compensation
2008-03-06
Why were executives at the helm of some of the world's largest banks compensated so richly even as their industry was being pummeled by the mortgage meltdown?

Lawmakers will pursue this question Friday when the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hears testimony from two former Wall Street CEOs, Charles Prince and Stanley O'Neal, and the chief of the nation's largest mortgage lender, Angelo Mozilo.

At issue are the salaries, bonuses, perks and stock awards that the executives received as the companies under their leadership took enormous losses on bad bets related to mortgage backed securities. Calls for accountability have become increasingly louder as the housing market continues to deteriorate and homeowners across the country face foreclosure.

Henry Waxman, the Democratic congressman who chairs the Committee, has developed a reputation as an aggressive reformer during his thirty years representing the Los Angeles area on Capitol Hill.

As a ranking member on the Committee, Waxman has tackled issues ranging from the high cost of prescription drugs to waste, fraud, and abuse in government contracting. Most recently, Waxman's committee made headlines when it held a series of high-profile hearings on the illegal use of steroids in major league baseball.

My thoughts: The government should not get involved here unless government is causing the problem. Maybe poke around and make sure there is no corruption, but that's it. And it seems to me the lawmakers have a problem of their own they need to clean up before they start looking into others' back yards. Perhaps they could start by legislating the kind of nose job Waxman needs before he's allowed to return to work.
Posted by:gorb

#11  I don't wanna get on the soapbox too much, but RB prolly has its' share of older guys/wymyns with apnea issues. Fix it! It's not that hard and it makes a life-changing for the better turn in your energy, work ability, everything. K?
Posted by: Frank G   2008-03-06 21:52  

#10  better than the mask (which I had for a year), but then I have the newest bestest pillows thang. I like it.... despite my fears. My BP's dropped dramatically with both. Those of youse with sleeping/snoring issues need to look into the CPAP cure - CHANGED my life, no sh*t
Posted by: Frank G   2008-03-06 21:49  

#9  Your stache will end up being as excellent as Waxman's when your nostrils look like his, too.

How do you lie the pillows?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-03-06 21:16  

#8  When did Lenin trim the goatee?
Posted by: tu3031   2008-03-06 21:15  

#7  agreed, but the masks tend to f*ck with my most excellent moustache
Posted by: Frank G   2008-03-06 20:34  

#6  Use a mask, Frank, like a real pirate pilot.
Posted by: Steve Canyon   2008-03-06 20:04  

#5   IANAL, but I have been a shareholder of some publicly-held corporations. I have no voice in their governance other than selling my shares (which I did). Many corporations run independently of shareholder input nowadays. In many cases shareholders receive no dividends but CEO's and select corporate employees receive huge bonuses regardless of their own or corporate performance. This is corruption. Shareholder lawsuits are the only other means of redress in situations like these. In recent years the government has severely restricted shareholder access to the legal system.
State & federal governments have created corporations, and court decisions have refined the rules which corporations must live by. Over the years the electorate has had little or no say in the birth of these fictitious persons. Corporations do not have human rights, except as granted by the government. This is one way to distinguish them from real people. (One advantage corporations have over the rest of us is immortality.) When corporate abuse, misallocation & destruction of resources cause enough damage to real citizens, corporate operations, and even corporate existence, can be modified, if not by lawsuits, then by the legislative process, the same process that brought corporations into existence.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2008-03-06 19:55  

#4  I have a CPAP (sleep apnea) machine with nasal pillows, and I'm constantly fretting I'll someday look like Waxman. Better to die in my sleep, I think
Posted by: Frank G   2008-03-06 18:22  

#3  I want them to investigate Hollywood. Why does the star of a movie get $5,000,000, while the gaffer and best boy only get a few thousand?
There's a congressional investigation I would support.
Posted by: Rambler in California   2008-03-06 11:45  

#2  High compensation for CEOs happens because companies choose to pay it.

This is an issue for shareholders, not Congress.
Posted by: charger   2008-03-06 11:15  

#1  Zero concern about trust fund babies and the Hampton's group that throw away money on companies that engage in this activity, cause its all in the "family". Of course the concern rightfully is for the investors relegated to large mutual funds who are stuck along for the ride. The mutual fund managers aren't too concerned about the compensation packages per se rather just the bottom line commissions they get. The people who should be hauled before the public officials are the 'raters'. Those businesses and institutions which grant acceptable ratings to companies that engage in nothing more than raiding the corporate assets to line the pockets of their managers and board members. Such entities should see their rating plummet and remain basement level which would cause the investment houses [to preclude existent and precedent laws from biting their asses] to keep their little fingers off of them.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-03-06 08:35  

00:00