Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Clinton, Obama backers tone down rhetoric |
2008-03-17 |
![]() All over the Sunday TV talk show circuit, journalists tried to get supporters for Clinton and Obama to attack the other side, but time and time again they would not take the bait and tried to stay on the high road. But away from the TV studios, campaign aides continued the aggressive back-and-forth that for several weeks has dominated the battle to win the party's nomination for the November election. "What is Senator Clinton hiding, and what is lurking in those documents that she believes voters don't have a right to know?" Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs asked in a conference call with reporters, referring to Clinton's tax returns and records of spending projects she has championed as a New York senator. Those in Clinton's camp said Obama turned to personal attacks whenever his campaign suffered a setback. "This is a tried and true technique of the Obama campaign that has repeatedly shifted 'negative' when they find momentum working against them," strategist Mark Penn said on a conference call. Clinton officials went on to say that Obama did not have enough experience to be commander in chief and called on him to release all tax returns and other documents since taking office in the Illinois legislature in 1997. |
Posted by:Fred |
#7 LOL at the graphic choice, Fred |
Posted by: Frank G 2008-03-17 14:04 |
#6 Nixon barely campaigned in 1972; McGovern was such a joke, that he wasn't worth breaking sweat over. McCain should be checking out the Golf Course at Camp David. smn: You aren't buying that "audacity of hope" gimmick, I despair. |
Posted by: McZoid 2008-03-17 10:44 |
#5 That's BHO. PIMF. |
Posted by: no mo uro 2008-03-17 07:46 |
#4 "aggressive messianic collectivism" Today's Lileks' reference to BOH. Right on, I think. |
Posted by: no mo uro 2008-03-17 07:45 |
#3 Feel better now McZoid? You can iron your sheet and fold it away for tomorrow! |
Posted by: smn 2008-03-17 07:36 |
#2 Obama is a one-trick pony. Half of his speeches are distorted personal histories of how he overcame peronal barriers, and once he hooks guilty whites he claims that shared "hope" will work wonders. Yah, give me 2 bottles of that snakeoil. There were similar pollyannas who hoped for peace in 1939; reality dictates that if you rest on hope, you get despair. The stench of "reparations" follows BHO like fleas follow dogs. Can't wait for the GOP attack ads, per Karl Rove's dicta: attack early and often. Reparations-unaffordable promises-afrocentrism-dhimmism-reverse racism- Oprah worship-black church agenda-surrenderist defense policies-deference to the Ayatollahs- soft on immigration controls-disregard of energy needs-owned by radical clerics-proponent of Euro style hate laws-anti profiling-anti capitalist- no administrative experience-dubious associations- evasive resume-misplacing cause of terrorism- hiding charitable donations-hiding contributor list-poor legislative and voting record-soft on race based gangs-over inclined to public housing solutions-panderings to white guilt-pronation to source blame racially-too trusting of Muslims- plagiarizing Jesse Jackson's "rainbow coalition" nonsense-omits to change muslim name to Christian-not team player in Senate-makes friends on racial basis-big spender-closed to desert based and limited intervention in Iraq-indifferent to treatment of Christians in muslim tyrannies-prone to favor spending on politically tied social projects-etc ad nauseum. Open questions: what's the worst aspect? Anybody have anything else? Should Karl Rove operate the McCain campaign? |
Posted by: McZoid 2008-03-17 04:15 |
#1 Darn, I was hoping that Chuck Asay's March 15 assessment was correct. |
Posted by: GK 2008-03-17 00:32 |