You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Army Reaches 70,000 Mark, As Taliban Vows New Offensive
2008-03-27
Officials in Kabul say the Afghan National Army soon will number 70,000 combat-ready soldiers -- the strongest the force has been since the fall of the Taliban regime in late 2001.

The buildup has come amid urgent calls within NATO for more combat troops to be sent to assist counterterror and stabilization efforts in that country. But the Afghan government says it will be years before Afghan forces are able to provide security throughout the country by themselves -- and the Taliban says it's not worried about the growth of the army.

In early 2002, just weeks after the collapse of the Taliban regime, the transitional government in Kabul announced a bold schedule to build the Afghan National Army from scratch. That schedule called for the recruitment and training of 70,000 Afghan soldiers before the presidential election in the fall of 2004. But that target proved to be overly optimistic. Until this year, desertions were so high among the fully trained Afghan soldiers that Kabul had difficulty maintaining a force of 30,000 troops.

Now, six years after the 70,000-soldier announcement, the goal is finally within reach.

General Mohammad Zahir Azimi, a spokesman for the Afghan Defense Ministry, tells RFE/RL's Radio Free Afghanistan that the recruitment, training, and retention of Afghan soldiers during the winter has been better than ever. "We have succeeded to bring about enormous changes in the quality and quantity of troops in the Afghan National Army compared to previous years. From [about early May], we will be able to have at least 70,000 soldiers deployed to fight against the enemy," Azimi says. "Last year, this number was about 30,000 soldiers. And our army is very well equipped this year. We have obtained new weapons and other military equipment. Our air force has been reestablished. And we have formed new commando and engineering battalions."
Posted by:Fred

#10  "Taliban Vows New Offensive"

I didn't think they could get any more offensive - but perhaps I was wrong....
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-03-27 21:29  

#9  heh heh! Mike and JFM >:)
Posted by: RD   2008-03-27 13:44  

#8  Brutal Iraqui Winter is a registered trademark of JFM Inc
Posted by: JFM   2008-03-27 12:01  

#7  The Taliban Spring Offensive,* coming as it does on the heels of the Brutal Afghan Winter,** . . .

*"Taliban Spring Offensive" is a registered service mark of Fisk Journalism PLC; used with permission.

**"Brutal Afghan Winter" is a registered trademark of Mark Steyn Global Content LLC.
Posted by: Mike   2008-03-27 07:26  

#6  IRNA > MOTTAKI: IRAN READY TO JOIN SHANGHAI COOPER ORGANIZATION + IRAN, TAIJIKISTAN, AND AFGHANISTAN TO BOLSTER ECONOMIC, CULTURAL TIES.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-03-27 03:20  

#5  SOUTH KOREA HAS PLANS TO PREEMPTIVELY ATTACK NORTH'S NUCLEAR SITES IFF UNDER THREAT

Good news. As for the ladies you list, JosephM, I fear not. But then, I don't know who the last one is.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-03-27 02:47  

#4  HMMMMM, so ISRAEL + EURO NAVAL FLEETS on one end, SOKORS + JAPAN [Taiwan?] on other end. RUSSIA-CHINA's BELOVED COMMIE-SOCIALIST/GOVTIST CENTRALISM IS ABOUT TO GO DECENTRALIZED AND FEDERALIZED?

Methinks that is what my former Aghan War comrade + WHITNEY HUSTON FAN OSAMA BIN LADEN sees also.

D *** NG IT, DOES NO ONE IN THE GWOT THINK ABOUT MARIAH? BEYONCE? GWEN? CARRIE UNDERWOOD?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-03-27 01:39  

#3  ION, TOPIX > KOREAS:NORTH NUKES ON [South Korea's]ATTACK RADARS + NEW SOUTH KOREAN CHIEF OF STAFF:SOUTH KOREA HAS PLANS TO PREEMPTIVELY ATTACK NORTH'S NUCLEAR SITES IFF UNDER THREAT. In addition, argues that SOUTH KOREA should strongly preserve and mil defend pre-existing defense lines agz NOKORS.

Also on TOPIX > CLINTON [Hillary], OBAMA SHOULD WARN NORTH KOREA ON NUKES.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-03-27 01:31  

#2  Target: RUSSIA + CENTRAL ASIA???

See PAYVAND > FM: IRAN READY TO IMPROVE ECONOMIC, CULTURAL TIES WITH TAIJIKISTAN, KAZAKHISTAN; + REDDIT > ARMENIA MUST ACCEPT KARABAKH INDEPENDENCE; + TOPIX > IRAN TO RECOGNIZE MUSLIM KOSOVO + KOSOVARS TO SEEK RELATIONS WITH NEIGHBORING MUSLIM GOVTS.

WAFF.com/TOPIX > SERBS SEEK/DESIRE PARTITION OF KOSOVO ALONG ETHNIC, RELIGIOUS LINES.

To save their ideo + Regional-Global Jihad, Radical Islam needs the "ISLAMIST BOMB" NOW,NOT LATER, ergo means HELP AND PROTECT IRAN + IRANIAN AMBITIONS > DESTABILIZE EVERYWHERE OR AMAP WHERE USA IS NOT, SAVE IRAN, GET THE BOMB + NUCTECHS.

Radical Islam has choosen NOT to put its Fate, its Jihad + OWG Islamist Agenda in the hands and control of non-Islamists, in the hands and control of "Infidel" and "Barbarian" "Crusader/
Zionist", etc. non-Muslim world powers.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-03-27 01:25  

#1  I think that the impulse will be to shift US forces from Iraq to Afghanistan instead of returning them to the US. Ironically, most not as combat forces, but as development forces.

This is a have your cake and eat it, too, scenario.

Other advantages would be that it opens up a second "front" on Iran, but also keeps up pressure on the Pakistan border, dampens the drug trade, and gives the Afghan government a lot more support to improve itself and get control of the country.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-03-27 00:27  

00:00