| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
| Punishing Hamas has backfired |
| 2008-03-27 |
| Want leverage? Then engage the Islamist regime. By Gareth Evans The policy of isolating Hamas and applying sanctions to Gaza has been a predictable failure. Violence to both Gazans and Israelis is rising. Economic conditions are ruinous, generating anger and despair. The credibility of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and other pragmatic forces has been grievously damaged. The peace process is in tatters. Meanwhile, Hamas's hold on the Gaza Strip, purportedly the principal target of the policy, has been strengthened. Since Hamas assumed full control in June 2007 the already-tight sanctions, imposed following the Islamists' January 2006 electoral victory, have been tightened further. Israel – upon which Gazans depend almost entirely for relations with the outside world – even curtailed cross-border passenger and goods traffic. Israel has hardly been alone. The West Bank-based Palestinian Authority, seeking to undermine Hamas's standing, has done its part to cut off Gaza and prevent the normal functioning of government. Feeble protests aside, the international community has at best been a model of passivity. The logic behind the policy was that by putting pressure on Hamas, they could prevent rocket launches into Israel. This would demonstrate to the Palestinian people that Hamas could not deliver and ought not be trusted. The hope was that the West Bank, buoyed by economic growth, a loosening of Israeli security measures, not to mention a revived peace process, would serve as an attractive countermodel. But the theory has not delivered on any of these counts. Within Gaza the debate about whether the sanctions have helped or hurt Hamas's efforts to consolidate power is, for all intents and purposes, over. The Islamist movement has come close to establishing an effective monopoly on the use of force and a near-monopoly on open political activity. It has refashioned the legal and legislative systems. And it enjoys freer rein to shape society through management of the health, education, and religious sectors. By boycotting the security, judicial, and other government sectors, the Palestinian Authority turned an intended punitive measure into an unintentional gift, creating a vacuum that Hamas has filled. The absence of any international involvement has meant the absence of leverage. The closure of the crossings has caused the private sector to collapse, eroding ordinary citizens' traditional coping mechanisms, increasing their dependence on those who govern, and weakening a constituency traditionally loyal to the Palestinian Authority. Some will argue that the isolation policy is working because Hamas has lost popularity, which even its leaders acknowledge. But intense public frustration in the Gaza Strip cannot be the measure of success. Gazans may not be satisfied with Hamas, but their anger continues to be directed at Israel and the West, as well as at Fatah, which many see as complicit in the siege. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #9 If Hamas territories were properly isolated it wouldn't be a problem for long. It would cannibalise itself until no one was left. Pax. |
| Posted by: Bulldog 2008-03-27 15:11 |
| #8 I know which would be more entertaining, #5 Excalibur. Pay-per-view, anyone? ;-p |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-03-27 13:36 |
| #7 See, it's the "isolating" part that's the mistake. Let's try "killing" instead, what say? |
| Posted by: Chief Running Gag 2008-03-27 12:59 |
| #6 “Feeble protests aside, the international community has at best been a model of passivity…The absence of any international involvement has meant the absence of leverage.” It’s truly ironic that Evan’s would suggest that “passivity” has helped cause this “failure” when that is precisely what he and his group has lobbied for. How wonderful it must be to live in 'Captain Biggles' world. To live in a world where the closest his manicured nails ever get to dirt is a non-chilled salad fork. His is a world where “rolling up your sleeves” requires one to first have his man-servant remove his Faberge cufflinks. And “Heavy lifting” simply means occasionally having to shift his mistress’ Gucci handbags for more leg room on his private jet. Yes it must be wonderful indeed. After all, a career based solely on maintaining the status-quo in world affairs must be the envy of every global elite. |
| Posted by: DepotGuy 2008-03-27 10:54 |
| #5 Send Evans in on foot with some flowers and a copy of the Koran. He will save us all. Or be tortured, paraded on television and beheaded. Hard to say which is more likely. |
| Posted by: Excalibur 2008-03-27 09:35 |
| #4 Just making them suffer unspeakable torment must be worth something. After all they want death as much as the Israelis want life, by their own words. |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2008-03-27 09:03 |
| #3 Punishing the Japanese in early 1941 also backfired, despite ongoing face-to-face negotiations. Talks with Hitler, however, achieved "peace in our time". The time just didn't last very long. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2008-03-27 06:03 |
| #2 Su madre, cabron! |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2008-03-27 04:09 |
| #1 Mr. Evans must be a BHO Democrat; he would talk to anyone. What was the name of the guy acting as a middleman between the Democrat Rep. and FARC? |
| Posted by: tipover 2008-03-27 00:45 |