You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Al-Mahdi army offers to lay down its arms
2008-04-08
Iraq’s largest and most dangerous militia will voluntarily disband if Shia scholars advise its leader to do so, officials said yesterday — a dramatic move that could quell much of the fighting in the war-torn country.

Aides to Hojatoleslam Moqtada al-Sadr said that he would send delegations to Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, a moderate religious leader in Najaf, and to senior clerics in Iran to consult on whether he should stand down his 60,000-strong al-Mahdi Army.

The sudden announcement — the first time that the rebellious cleric had offered to disband his forces — came as US and Iraqi troops were poised for a key offensive into his Baghdad stronghold of Sadr City.

Yesterday streams of refugees were pouring out of Sadr City as automatic gunfire and mortar bomb blasts ripped through the giant slum that is home to 2.5 million people. Terrified residents scuttled down side streets as tanks trundled along the main thoroughfares, shooting at guerrillas. A massive American and Iraqi security presence had ringed the area, with police and soldiers guarding every exit with many predicting a final, bloody showdown as popular support drained from al-Mahdi Army.

The position of Hojatoleslam al-Sadr, whose fighters fought government forces to a standstill in Basra, was looking precarious. His former erstwhile ally Nouri al-Maliki, the Shia Prime Minister who personally led the Basra crackdown, saw his standing bolstered by his tough approach to the militias.

Despite the inconclusive results of his Basra offensive, Mr al-Maliki has refused to back down and this weekend stitched together a rare consensus of Kurds, Sunnis and Shias to back a law banning from future elections any party that maintains a militia.

That united stance has put the Sadrists on the back foot, and support for the militia was waning even in Sadr City itself as official forces pushed ever deeper into al-Mahdi Army territory.

Ali Nema, a 45-year-old bureaucrat, was pushing his elderly parents and young children out of Sadr City on a wooden market barrow as gunfire rattled a few streets away. “I had to get them out now because almost the whole of my sector has left, more than 80 per cent of the houses are empty now. The Americans are attacking, the Mahdi Army mortars are falling and the Iraqi Army are fighting too,” he said.

Zainab Amer, a student, was stuck in her house for two weeks, too afraid to leave. She fled yesterday after a mortar bomb killed four neighbours. Before she left, four militiamen were shot dead in her street fighting the US Army. “I saw one of them having his hand blown off right in front of our door. It was a horrible sight,” she said. “Everyone is fighting everyone else.”

An Iraqi police commander whose forces have sealed the eastern approaches to Sadr City said that raids would resume today when a government deadline for the militia to disarm expires. “I think this time they’re finished,” said Brigadier Ali Ibrahim Daboun. “In all the previous battles, they were attacking and we were on the defensive. Now it’s the other way round.”

Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#9  What's interesting is how this reconciles with what they are reporting in the MSM (CNN, MSNBC, etc.)

Eenie-meenie-miney-mo...
Posted by: eltoroverde   2008-04-08 10:50  

#8  That ayatollah-in-training all-Sadr is asking means the answer in his mind is already in the affirmative. He never thought of asking the question before.

Good luck to your brother, bigjim-ky, and all the rest who are rooting out the bad guys.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-04-08 09:07  

#7  One of the effects of having Tater in Iran studying is that he is buying into the religious structure. His status as a hojatoleslam (authority on Islam) makes it a requirement that he seek guidance from the grand ayatollah (sign of Allah).

Now, whether Sistani will actually help out here is probably less than 50%.
Posted by: mhw   2008-04-08 08:09  

#6  Looks like 2004 left a deep impression on Sadr. He also knows hiding in a Shiite holy site won't save him or his lackeys this time.
Posted by: ed   2008-04-08 08:07  

#5  Whatever the MSM tells me now, I believe the exact opposite.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-04-08 07:58  

#4  Is it even Maliki behind the push anymore? He's a duplicitous toad and I wouldn't trust him any further than I could throw him. My brother is being moved from Al-Taji airbase to a Stryker brigade in Baghdad for the festivities, I bid him happy hunting.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-04-08 07:56  

#3  Â“In all the previous battles, they were attacking and we were on the defensive. Now itÂ’s the other way round.”

Yup, that's one of the metrics we look for.
Posted by: lotp   2008-04-08 06:26  

#2  The MSM were completely wrong on who was winning and losing. It occured to me a couple of days ago that they were reporting what they wished were true.
Posted by: phil_b   2008-04-08 06:11  

#1  Yes another defeat for Bush and the Bush-backed govenrment of Iraq, this is clearly a victory for al Sadr, who is biding his time and lulling his hapless enemies into a false sense of security.

Hey! That's not bad! Maybe I'll apply to The New York Times!
Posted by: Bobby   2008-04-08 05:53  

00:00