You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
'Report on Sept. 6 strike to show Saddam transferred WMDs to Syria'
2008-04-08
Hat tip, LGF
An upcoming joint US-Israel report on the September 6 IAF strike on a Syrian facility will claim that former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein transferred weapons of mass destruction to the country, Channel 2 stated Monday.
24 hours rule
Posted by:g(r)omgoru

#21  Its religion with the left - excpet unlike Christianity of the Pope Benedict brand, there is no rationality involved.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-04-08 23:00  

#20  If this proves true, it won't phase the antiwar nuts at all. Just like Global Warming actually being global cooling hasn't made them miss a beat.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-04-08 19:21  

#19  This story seems "too good to check."

I'm with Gromoru: 24 hour rule.
Posted by: Hector   2008-04-08 14:15  

#18  Old Spook said:

I chalk it up to the general incompetence the Bush administration has shown in publicly making its case for ANYTHING.

I think you are wrong. Problem is that thanks to the MSM, Chirak, Villepin and the "pesace" movement Bush had to spend all of his pôlitical capital for going into Irak. AZfter that he was politically paralyzed.

Also Saddams plan was to lay underground until the "peace" movement and the Hanoi Fondas foprced a withdrawal from Irak, perhpas through a Democratic victory in 2004. Of course it was essential to make Bush look like an idiot, thus put the weapons in another country. Notivce that Bush never told the WMD's were the only or even the main motive to invade, it was the MSM who placed that emphasis on the WMDs and so increased the political cost of not finding them.
Posted by: JFM   2008-04-08 14:05  

#17  *Video Proof, Iraqi Gen. Georges Sada: Saddam Moved Large Amounts of WMD to Syria in 2003 just before Op Iraqi Freedom.



Anfal: No WMD? BDS Denial
Posted by: RD   2008-04-08 13:37  

#16  I chalk it up to the general incompetence the Bush administration has shown in publicly making its case for ANYTHING.

Reagan was the Great Communicator.

Bush is the Great Mumbler.

(As I said here years ago, what good it the "Bully Pulpit" if all you do is mumble)
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-04-08 13:14  

#15  Iblis, there's knowing in the sense of being pretty sure and then there's being able to prove it to the satisfaction of others.
Posted by: lotp   2008-04-08 12:54  

#14  Drew has a bit more here.

Report Will Claim Israel's Airstrike on Syria Hit WMD's Transfered From Saddam.....
Posted by: Icerigger   2008-04-08 12:35  

#13  If the WMD's moved to Syria, then this administration had to know about it. So, the $64 question is, why did they chose to weather the storm of criticism instead of saying something. A couple of recon photos would have made many Dems look really stupid, especially since they also must have known about it. So, why stay silent?
Posted by: Iblis   2008-04-08 12:22  

#12  It's sort of the default moonbat facial expression.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2008-04-08 11:21  

#11  and your moonbat friends will continue to look at you that way regardless of proof positive.
Posted by: bman   2008-04-08 11:01  

#10  And yet, when I try to tell these things to my moonbat friends they look at me like my head is on backwards. I'm sure they will continue to do so even after this report is released.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2008-04-08 10:49  

#9  In December 2002, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon announced on television that Saddam had hidden chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction in Syria.

Interestingly, the article in the link above ties in with a link to Debka in today's Rantburg WOT Background section about trouble in the Syrian government between Baby Assad and his brother-in-law Gen. Asif Shawqat.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2008-04-08 10:29  

#8  Wasn't Ariel Sharon the one who said it first?
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2008-04-08 09:55  

#7  So did Debka.

Debka has some nuggets of pure intelligence gold in it. You just have to sift through all the other dross in the meantime. Makes me not want the data sorter job in the CIA.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-04-08 09:48  

#6  So did Debka.
Posted by: phil_b   2008-04-08 09:36  

#5  [moonbat]
I question the timing. This is more BushCo propaganda intended to scare people into supporting Chimpy McHaliburton's racist oil war.
[/moonbat]

Seriously, folks . . . you called it, 'Spook.
Posted by: Mike   2008-04-08 09:27  

#4  We saw photos of that here just before the 2003 invasion, and reports from the Iraqi general involved, sometime later. The truck convoys trundled across the border, heading toward the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon, as I recall, carrying WMDs, precursers, missiles and other weaponry, and lots of cash to finance the fighters after the invasion -- as indeed happened. It seems to me that Old Patriot in particular had opinions on what the photos showed.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-04-08 09:18  

#3  What have I been saying about where those went, since oh, back in 2003?
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-04-08 08:59  

#2  Hope the commandos on the ground took lots of pretty pictures.
Posted by: ed   2008-04-08 08:09  

#1  Bush lied, thousands died

Bush lied, thousands died
(repeat until your head explodes)
Posted by: Moonbat Bobby   2008-04-08 06:46  

00:00