You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Hayden: Syrian site could have produced fuel for 2 weapons
2008-04-29
WASHINGTON - CIA Director Michael Hayden said Monday that the alleged Syrian nuclear reactor destroyed by an Israeli airstrike in September would have produced enough plutonium for one or two bombs within a year of becoming operational.

U.S. intelligence and administration officials publicly disclosed last week their assessment that Syria was building a covert nuclear reactor with North Korean assistance. They said it was modeled on the shuttered North Korean reactor at Yongbyon, which produced a small amount of plutonium. The Syrian site, they said, was within weeks or months of being operational.

"In the course of a year after they got full up they would have produced enough plutonium for one or two weapons," Hayden told reporters after a speech at Georgetown University.

Neither the United States nor Israel told the International Atomic Energy Agency about the Syrian site until last week, about a year after they obtained what they considered to be decisive intelligence: dozens of photographs from a handheld camera that showed both the interior and exterior of the mysterious compound in Syria's eastern desert.

From the CIA's perspective, that intelligence was not the United States' to share with the U.N. nuclear watchdog, Hayden said. "We've made it clear we did not have complete control over the totality of the information because obviously it was the result of a team effort," he said. "One has to respect the origin of the information in terms of how it is used."

A senior administration official told reporters last week that the United States kept the information secret after the Israeli strike because it feared revealing it might provoke Syria to strike back at Israel.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  SAVING THE JIHAD 2008-2012/13 > IMO, this will NOT be achieved wid "dirty bombs" albeit such will likely become a part of the Islamist arsenal anyway. I do not believe that any detonation of one or more WEAK/LIGHT "DIRTY BOMBS", whether in US-Iran conflict andor ME Terror attack agz US-Allies, will INDUCE THE USA TO DROP ENTRENCHMENT AND LEAVE THE ME = SEVERELY REDUX TO IMPOTENT LOCAL MILFOR LEVELS.

The ISLAMIST GLOBAL JIHAD may not survive after 2010 or 2012 unless somethings change in how Radicla Islam is milpol fighting it. "TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE" AS PER GLOBAL JIHAD > ergo, a STRONGER BOMB = STRONGER HIGH-PROFILE ATTACKS = DETERRENCE EFECTS AGZ ANY AND ALL NON-MUSLIM/ISLAMIST WORLD POWERS. Also bear in mind, a CHEAP DIRTY BOMB = "RADIOLOGICAL" [CBR/CBRN] OD DUBIOUS MAGNITUDE-YIELD infers potentially LONGER LEAD TIME FOR JIHAD WHICH THE ISLAMISTS DON'T HAVE, unless the latter are willing to drop "GLOBAL" for "LOCAL/SECTARIAN" for one or more decades - read, US-ALLIES + OTHER NON-MUSLIM/ISLAMIST GOVTS-POWERS WILL STILL BE AROUND. GOOD FOR GOING " BAC TO THE FUTURE" AS PER GLOBAL WARMING AND ANTIQUITOUS LOCAL CARAVAN RAIDING BUT NOT FOR DECISIVELY WINNING 21st CENTURY "ISLAMIST OWG"!

By any measure, Radical Islam + IRAN need PLUTONIUM ANDOR URANIUM BOMBS AMAP ASAP. GEOPOL GEOMIL GEOSTRATEGIC "PARITY" is the IMMEDIATE/SHORT-TERM GOAL of the Islamists right now 2008-2012/13, AND TAINT HAVE SAID "PARITY" AGZ THERMONUCLEAR+ WORLD STATES WID DUBIOUS CHEAP DIRTY BOMBS-TECHS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-04-29 18:10  

#2  Syrian nuclear reactor destroyed by an Israeli airstrike in September would have produced enough plutonium for one or two bombs within a year of becoming operational

According to Debka, it's "dirty bombs"---not nukes.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2008-04-29 16:39  

#1  Thank you, Israel.

(Since the "international community" won't say it)
Posted by: charger   2008-04-29 15:28  

00:00