You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
B.O. Sistah Soljahs Thulsa Doom
2008-04-30
Democrat Barack Obama said Tuesday he was outraged and appalled by the latest comments from his former pastor, who asserted that criticism of his fiery sermons is an attack on the black church and the U.S. government was responsible for the creation of the AIDS virus.
Good setup, adroit move, but maybe not enough at this point.
The presidential candidate is seeking to tamp down the growing fury over Rev. Jeremiah Wright and his incendiary remarks that threaten to undermine his campaign. "I am outraged by the comments that were made and saddened by the spectacle that we saw yesterday," Obama told reporters at a news conference.

After weeks of staying out of the public eye while critics lambasted his sermons, Wright made three public appearances in four days to defend himself. The former pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago has been combative, providing colorful commentary and feeding the story Obama had hoped was dying down. "This is not an attack on Jeremiah Wright," Wright told the Washington media Monday. "It has nothing to do with Senator Obama. It is an attack on the black church launched by people who know nothing about the African-American religious tradition."

Obama told reporters Tuesday that Wright's comments do not accurately portray the perspective of the black church. "The person I saw yesterday was not the person that I met 20 years ago," Obama said of the man who married him.

Wright criticized the U.S. government as imperialist and stood by his suggestion that the United States invented the HIV virus as a means of genocide against minorities. "Based on this Tuskegee experiment and based on what has happened to Africans in this country, I believe our government is capable of doing anything," he said.

Obama said he heard that Wright had given "a performance" and when he watched tapes, he realized that it more than just a case of the former pastor defending himself. "What became clear to me was that he was presenting a world view that contradicts what I am and what I stand for," Obama said.
Posted by:Fred

#17  heh heh, the pic what-guareenteed an afternoon LIFT & HOOT!
Posted by: RD   2008-04-30 18:45  

#16  B.O. hasn't dispelled the Wright issue with this single, calculated, belated statement.

The Dem nominee is a win/win for Republicans: either Hillary's gals or Obama's blacks will be thoroughly disaffected.

McCain? Ugh! But pass the popcorn anyway.
Posted by: Kirk   2008-04-30 18:38  

#15  It is an attack on the black church launched by people who know nothing about the African-American religious tradition.

Well, maybe it's time for a little lesson.

My guess is that Wright's church may be further away from center than most. But then why is it so popular if that is so? I also guess that this "black church" should hold about the same values as the "church" in general. But if this is true, then why should there be a market for white/black/other churches?
Posted by: gorb   2008-04-30 15:34  

#14  Â“Democrat Barrack Obama said Tuesday he was outraged and appalled by the latest comments from his former pastor…”

Obama even went as far as describing his former Pastors’ words as “destructive”. Oddly, he never described Wrights’ words as being “Racist”. Oh that’s right…only the White privileged class can be…you know…racist. Pardon me...I must have been using the typical white person left-side of my brain.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2008-04-30 15:06  

#13  Hillary. She could still squeak it out, but it easy to see her losing the nomination.

NO, mark my words, she intends to be President, that includes small things like stealing the nomination as a matter of fact.

She WILL steal it, or try hard to.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2008-04-30 14:08  

#12  A month ago he could no longer disavow him then he could his own grandmother, now he'd set him on fire on national television if he could get the airtime.
Got a feeling Barack's getting sick of waking up in the middle of the night in a flop sweat while grabbing for his cigarettes...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-04-30 12:12  

#11  Ayers may sink him; Wright won't.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-04-30 10:55  

#10  Obama's first mistake was not throwing Wright off the planet when the first hint of this came up in the press. Now, it just looks like desperation. Wright has said this crap for far too long and Obama has been with him for too long and Wright will end Obama's chances for a general election win.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-04-30 10:29  

#9  This was the minimum he had to do. He finally used the word "outrage" and stopped giving us lectures about the black church. And kinda sorta repudiated rev. nutso personally, by saying "this aint the man I met 20 yrs ago"

NOw I think he coulda hit the ball out of the park by going further, and point by point rejecting it in more detail, and I think the black community would have gone with him on that. But he has a tendency toward caution. Hes not going for homers, when he can get on base with a single. Of course that kind of strategy can lose ball games.

That speaks to too little.

Is it too late? I dont know. Probably not vis a vis Hillary. She could still squeak it out, but it easy to see her losing the nomination.
Vis a vis McCain? Probably not either - sure its inconsistent with his prior statement, but I think folks here would be among the first to say McCain has been far from consistent himself on a few issues. Now to me, the willingess to change in the face of facts is a positive on both their parts (as for Hillary too) and that its sometimes blatantly political isnt always bad either.

Now if someone has tapes of Rev Nutso saying this consistently, over the last two decades, that could still be quite damaging. But if its just over the last 4 years, probably not. The real secret Obama doesnt want to talk about is that, given his stellar (and from the experience viewpoint, troubling) rise from state legislator to US Senate to Prez candidate in 4 years, he almost certainly was NOT in church very much at all over that time. Hes basically been in almost fulltime campaign mode the entire period.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2008-04-30 09:32  

#8  "Obama said of the man who married him."

Ha!

OK, I'm five. But still!
Posted by: Mitch H.   2008-04-30 09:11  

#7  The only question is whether Democrats are dumb enough to fall for it.

There is no question about it, they are.
Posted by: Thromonter Platypus6242   2008-04-30 08:32  

#6  You dissed us, Barack. You dissed us!
Now you pay...
Posted by: Big Arugula   2008-04-30 08:27  

#5  Rev. Wright's message and Obama's association with him works well on the local African-American political scene in Chicago.

Nationally (or outside of any inner city), it is a train-wreck.

Obama wants to continue without the scrutiny, so he throws Wright under the bus and the inner city folks are going to give him as 'pass' for this action (hudna).

"Why can't I just eat my waffle?" - It's a sour Waffle indeed.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2008-04-30 08:01  

#4  AH, TW ... But he's all about (as N Guard puts it) change! So he's going to change! Show the world what it means to change! He can do it! Admit he made a mistake! Go to another church! Stop donating big bucks to the Rev. Wright's church! Change!

Change, baby! Lemme show you how it's done!
Posted by: Bobby   2008-04-30 07:54  

#3  But Reverend Wright has been saying these things the past 20 years-- the church has been selling the tapes. Sudden outrage over the latest statement, televised live, does not ring true...as we would expect from the honourable freshman senator, the Candidate Obama.
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-04-30 07:16  

#2  Which would be ever so slightly credible if these two thieves had not said they would establish distance between each other if Obama's campaign got this far. The only question is whether Democrats are dumb enough to fall for it.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-04-30 06:19  

#1  Too little, way too late. Change!
Posted by: N guard   2008-04-30 03:19  

00:00