You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Marines stay in Afghan town after Taliban influx
2008-05-15
GARMSER, Afghanistan (AP) — U.S. Marines who once planned to be in this southern Afghan town for just a few days are extending their mission by several weeks after facing an influx of Taliban fighters.

The change in plans shows that despite a record number of international troops in the country, forces are still spread thin and U.S. commanders must make tough choices about where to deploy them.

Manpower problems are acute in Helmand, the largest and probably the most dangerous province in Afghanistan, where the U.S. 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit arrived late last month to open a route to move troops to its southern reaches near the border with Pakistan.

Britain has about 7,500 soldiers in the province, but does not have enough troops to move south of Garmser, a district still largely held by the Taliban and bursting with opium poppy fields.

The 2,400-strong Marine unit met stiff resistance as they moved in. Between 100 and 400 Taliban fighters moved into the Garmser area as the poppy harvest got under way, apparently to defend their interests in the lucrative drug trade.

Maj. Tom Clinton Jr. said the Marines would be in Garmser for several more weeks. It means the Marines might not take part in an operation that was planned in another southern province this month.

"The number of fighters that stood and fought is kind of surprising to me, but obviously they're fighting for something," Clinton said, alluding to poppies. "They're flowing in, guys are going south and picking up arms. We have an opportunity to really clear them out, cripple them, so I think we're exploiting the success we're finding."

Helmand is the hub of opium production in Afghanistan, which accounts for more than 90 percent of the global supply of this raw material of heroin. The Taliban are believed to derive tens of millions of dollars from the trade.

Still, the Marines have been careful not to alienate residents by destroying the poppy fields that poor farmers rely on for income. Commanders say their goal is to rid the region of Taliban fighters so the Afghan government can move in and tackle the drug problem.

The prospects of that happening appear remote. Although thousands of acres of poppy fields are eradicated annually in Afghanistan, it is only a small fraction of the total area sown. Year after year, production has soared and security has deteriorated.

In recognition of the growing threat posed by Taliban militants, there are now almost 70,000 international soldiers in Afghanistan. The U.S. has 33,000, the most since the U.S.-led invasion in late 2001 ousted the Taliban for giving haven to al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.

U.S. forces have mostly operated in the east of the country, rather than the south, where NATO has struggled to find nations willing to fight the increasingly bloody insurgency.

U.S. Gen. Dan McNeill, the top NATO commander in Afghanistan, has said he needs three more brigades — two for combat and one to train Afghan soldiers, roughly 7,500 to 10,000 additional soldiers.

When the Marines eventually leave Garmser, any gains the 24th has made could be quickly erased unless other forces from NATO or the Afghan government move in.

"We can't be a permanent 24/7 presence. We don't have enough men to stay here," said Staff Sgt. Darrell Penyak, 29, of Grove City, Ohio. "We would need the ANA (Afghan army) to move in, and right now the way we're fighting, there's no way the ANA can come in. They couldn't handle it."

Afghanistan's army and police forces are steadily growing, but are still not big — or skilled — enough to protect much of the country. Spokesmen for both forces said they were not aware of plans to send forces to Garmser.

Col. Nick Borton, commander of British forces in the southern part of Helmand, recently visited U.S. positions in Garmser, where he told the Americans he'd be happy if they stayed on. "If they're here for only a short time, we can't build very much off that," he said. "Their presence for a few days doesn't really help us."
Posted by:Fred

#9  i kind of like the idea of squashing the talibunnies, THEN destroying / buying out the fields' best of both worlds.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-05-15 13:58  

#8  Destroy the fields and pay the farmers


I posted an article on this the other day. It looks like we won't have to take nearly so active a role in the situation -- the price of wheat has tripled at the same time as that of opium has fallen, so in the pacified areas the farmers are making the switch in their own financial interest. The Afghan farmers around Garmser no doubt would prefer to make the switch, too, if the Marines are staying to protect them from bad guys.
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-05-15 12:32  

#7  Agree with lh on this one. Who cares where we kill them or why. As long as the talibunnies are dead.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-05-15 10:46  

#6  "U.S. Marines who once planned to be in this southern Afghan town for just a few days are extending their mission by several weeks after facing an influx of Taliban Pakistani fighters."

as we say, fixed it.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-05-15 10:23  

#5  is it actually necessary to destroy the fields? from what I can gather, this is a fly paper strategy. The simple presence of the USMC makes it hard for the Taliban to collect revenues from the opium farmers. Which FORCES them to engage in offensive, quasi-conventional tactics, which results in dramatic Taliban casualities.

Key graf - 'The number of fighters that stood and fought is kind of surprising to me, but obviously they're fighting for something," Clinton said, alluding to poppies. "They're flowing in, guys are going south and picking up arms. We have an opportunity to really clear them out, cripple them, so I think we're exploiting the success we're finding."'


Happy hunting indeed!

Posted by: liberalhawk   2008-05-15 10:02  

#4  Failing the above option, at least start tracking and destroying the stockpiles of opium. Start taking apart the Taliban economic base.
Posted by: Grunter   2008-05-15 08:45  

#3  Destroy the fields and pay the farmers

That's the best option. Give the farmers seed grains and tell tell them we will buy the next harvest at a set price. If they grow poppies then the field will be destroyed and they will get nothing.
Posted by: ed   2008-05-15 08:38  

#2  Helmand is the hub of opium production in Afghanistan, which accounts for more than 90 percent of the global supply of this raw material of heroin. The Taliban are believed to derive tens of millions of dollars from the trade.

Destroy the fields and pay the farmers........otherwise, this just sets up a realignment for continuing drug trade......that aint good. Reduces our efforts to a pretense.
Posted by: Thraviper Panda2099   2008-05-15 07:35  

#1  Happy hunting, Marines!
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-05-15 07:10  

00:00