You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Troops in Mosul Dig their job
2008-05-28

MOSUL, Iraq — As the sun rose Sunday, it found the 43rd Engineer Company’s bulldozers already at work scraping dirt into ever larger piles. East of the engineers, the sun lit up the buildings of Mosul — at about 2 million people, Iraq’s second biggest city. To the west, it shone on the vast emptiness of the desert outside the city.

Mosul has just three main roads going into it, but that desert offers an alternative for anyone who wants to circumvent the checkpoints on the official routes. So Army engineers have built a massive dirt berm around the city to funnel any insurgents through checkpoints, where they have a better chance of being discovered during routine searches.

"There are basically an infinite number of routes if youÂ’re coming in from the desert," said 1st Lt. Ben Weaver, a platoon leader in the company.

Leaders have named this massive berm the "Riyadh Line," after the senior Iraqi commander in the area. The berm is a wall of dirt at least four feet high — but twice that in many places — that almost completely encircles Mosul. The 43rd Engineer Company maintains about 15 kilometers of the berm, essentially the western half of the Riyadh Line.

Similar berms have been built around other Iraqi cities in the past, most notably in nearby Tal Afar. And long concrete blast walls have divided many parts of Baghdad in recent months.

In Mosul, the soldiers built their section of the line over eight freezing days in December. The city was still extremely violent then, so they tried to do as much of their work as possible at night. Still, some of the engineers worked upward of 20 hours a day.

Pvt. Edwin Ocampo drives one of the unitÂ’s armored combat earth movers, a bulldozer built like a tank. He recalled moving dirt for almost three days straight, getting a rest and then working another three days straight.

"It was a long, painful process," he said.

Soldiers anchored the berm to steep ridges and other natural obstacles that surround Mosul, as well as tank ditches from the Saddam regime. The majority of the engineersÂ’ time Sunday was spent just negotiating the rough ground around the perimeter.

Most of the soldiers ride in massive armored trucks over steep ridges that would give many drivers pause even in vehicles with a lower center of gravity. Yet the soldiers doggedly plugged away at their mission, even when one of their bulldozers blew a hydraulic line and had to be towed by another bulldozer.

With no one guarding the Riyadh Line, insurgents can make a hole in the berm and get through, Weaver said. So soldiers with the 43rd Engineer Company must head out about once a week to repair the holes in their section of the line.

Even the holes arenÂ’t completely without merit, though.

"At least we can identify their routes and pick Â’em off easier," said Sgt. 1st Class Rodney Lerue, a platoon sergeant in the company.

Like other engineering projects in Iraq, the work has become a chess match with insurgents. Soldiers build the berm. The insurgents make a hole. Soldiers fill the hole. The insurgents plant a bomb in the next hole they make.

The engineers now use an armored truck to run a bomb-detonating device over each hole before they try to fill it with their bulldozers.

Soldiers are mixed in their opinion of the operationÂ’s success. Ocampo credited the berm for reducing the number of attacks around Mosul in recent weeks. Weaver, however, said that although it was important it was just one piece of an overarching strategy thatÂ’s also seen success in standing up the Iraqi army and catching insurgents.

Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#14  Gorb - Any number of cheap gasbags come to mind. I'm just taken with the idea of barrage balloons returning fire as needed. Even better would be an armored blimp!
Posted by: Harcourt Jush7795   2008-05-28 16:18  

#13  Stake down some tanglefoot and concertina in the top of the berms as well.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-28 15:42  

#12  Just train the Iraqis to respond to trip flares and seismatic sensors. Station them in bunkers with good overhead cover. Hand them a field phone hooked to the US TOC.

On our part, have an alert5 helicopter gunship on hot standby, and a few tubes of 155 airburst pre-registered for immediate fire, and a platoon of Stryker Cav on warm ready (Soldiers up and equipped, vehicles PMCS'd but off).

That'll secure the berm for the most part if they want to really lock it down.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-28 15:39  

#11  better to draw fire to a cheap gasbag than an valuable GI.

Anyone in particular in mind? ;-)
Posted by: gorb   2008-05-28 15:15  

#10  It would be easy enough to put a remote weapon system on the masts for immediate, light impact response. The light impact aspect comes from using small arms (7.62mm) rather than mortar, artillery or UAV-based missile fire. Not appropriate in all cases, but certainly in many of them.
Posted by: remoteman   2008-05-28 13:43  

#9  If the berm ranges from 4 - 8 feet. Make the 4 foot sections where you can set up traps with snipers. For a while, at least the jihadis would probably try to breach the berm in the easier 4 foot sections. This could develop into some target rich environments. "Pathways to Paradise."
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-05-28 13:23  

#8  Well put, OldSpook. The analogy is, in fact, exact. Barriers (whether passive like berms or a bit more exciting like minefields) limit and channel enemy activity - that is, they're a part of seizing and maintaining the initiative. To digress to the domestic thing a bit, as many here and elsewhere have noted, a few simple and seemingly disconnected actions like making the border less passable, targeting huge illegal labor magnets such as specific manufacturing centers, and allowing immigration status to enter into some local/state law enforcement actions will, together, produce instant and dramatic changes in behavior by the target population.

In Iraq, one can only repeat the quiet refrain of "why only now?" WRT berms around Mosul. The strategic level is very similar to the illegal immigration issue: change the temperature of the water more to your liking, and only good things flow from it. Without the demonstration of will that the "surge" represents, or something similar, trying to pacify Iraq was doable but only in a horribly wasteful fashion.

The words "counterinsurgency strategy" should be banned from intelligent discourse, because they mask, as most such phrases do, the fact that only common sense is required. Berms to limit/channel enemy movement, systematic identification of enemy personnel through mass detentions/screenings of military-aged males, extreme differentiation in punishment/incentives meted out to hostile/cooperative neighborhoods, and like measures would produce much wrong-headed and morally narcissistic howling from the usual suspects (sadly, including many in uniform), along with instant and dramatic results. Weak versions of these measures have now been used, though not usually in conjunction with each other, and still have produced results.

On a micro level, beyond the surveillance issue (what about cheap distributed observation nodes connected wirelessly to an ops center?), I do wonder about other technical possibilities. Mines seem too indiscrimate considering the huge size and number of Iraqis who probably will have opportunities to be stupid around it. But how about passive fiber-optic sensors, wireless IR or visual cameras, all linked to UAVs and rapid-response teams.
Posted by: Verlaine   2008-05-28 13:10  

#7  Put a UAV on patrol over the berm at night. A predator with a Hellfire or two should slow down any jihadis who try to break through. Or they could be used to call in an artillery strike at an appropriate moment.
Posted by: Rambler in California   2008-05-28 12:50  

#6  Soldiers build the berm. The insurgents make a hole. Soldiers fill the hole. The insurgents plant a bomb in the next hole they make.

how about we plant the bombs in the berm to start with.

"At least we can identify their routes and pick Â’em off easier," said Sgt. 1st Class Rodney Lerue, a platoon sergeant in the company.


Man I love the way our military think ;)
Posted by: Jan   2008-05-28 12:01  

#5  Put some Hellfires on those blimps ;^)
Posted by: Spot   2008-05-28 10:39  

#4  Thanks, interesting info - need to arm the blimps so they can fight back, still better to draw fire to a cheap gasbag than an valuable GI.

Masts seem better suited for the pure recon needed in this instance, but an armed blimp would still be interesting.
Posted by: Cleting Black1202   2008-05-28 10:26  

#3  The blimps used today are tethered, unmanned platforms called areostats. only one problems--It was discovered that the hajjiis like to use them for target practice, necessitating frequent downtime for repairs.

Now the military uses tall (102+ ft.) crank-up masts with cameras & designators on them. Word is that they work real good, range of 15 miles or so.
Posted by: N guard   2008-05-28 09:35  

#2  Perfect example of miltary utility of a barrier - its not there to stop enemy action completely, but to hamper it and increase the cost/time/effort of traversing certain routes, as well as increasing the chances of getting caught.

Kinda like a border fence here in the US, if we could ever be bothered to build one.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-05-28 09:31  

#1  Catch him digging the holes, and you solve multiple problems.

Does the Army still use blimps?
Posted by: Cleting Black1202   2008-05-28 09:04  

00:00