You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Troops Using Drugs to Cope
2008-06-09
Bad, bad military doping up unsuspecting troops to continue Bush's war without end. O.K., so it doesn't come right out and say that, but that's what it means.
For the first time in history, a sizable and growing number with hardly any facts to back up this statement of U.S. combat troops are taking daily doses of antidepressants to calm nerves strained by repeated and lengthy tours in Iraq and Afghanistan but certainly not the day-to-day stresses of combat, boredom, and lack of sleep. The medicines are intended not only to help troops keep their cool but also to enable the already strapped Army to preserve its most precious resource: soldiers on the front lines. Data contained in the Army's fifth Mental Health Advisory Team report indicate that, according to an anonymous survey of U.S. troops taken last fall, about 12% of combat troops in Iraq and 17% of those in Afghanistan are taking prescription antidepressants or sleeping pills to help them cope. Escalating violence in Afghanistan and the more isolated mission have driven troops to rely more on medication there than in Iraq, military officials say.

Several paragraphs later, we get this perspective -
The military's rising use of antidepressants also reflects their prevalence in the civilian population. In 2004, the last year for which complete data for the U.S. are available, doctors wrote 147 million prescriptions for antidepressants...

The increase in the use of medication among U.S. troops suggests the heavy mental and psychological price being paid by soldiers fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Pentagon surveys show that while all soldiers deployed to a war zone will feel stressed, 70% will manage to bounce back to normalcy. But about 20% will suffer from what the military calls "temporary stress injuries," and 10% will be afflicted with "stress illnesses." Such ailments, according to briefings commanders get before deploying, begin with mild anxiety and irritability, difficulty sleeping, and growing feelings of apathy and pessimism. As the condition worsens, the feelings last longer and can come to include panic, rage, uncontrolled shaking and temporary paralysis. The symptoms often continue back home, playing a key role in broken marriages, suicides and psychiatric breakdowns.

The mental trauma has become so common that the Pentagon may expand the list of "qualifying wounds" for a Purple Heart — historically limited to those physically injured on the battlefield — to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on May 2 that it's "clearly something" that needs to be considered, and the Pentagon is weighing the change.

Using drugs to cope with battlefield traumas is not discussed much outside the Army, but inside the service it has been the subject of debate for years. "No magic pill can erase the image of a best friend's shattered body or assuage the guilt from having traded duty with him that day," says Combat Stress Injury, a 2006 medical book edited by Charles Figley and William Nash that details how troops can be helped by such drugs. "Medication can, however, alleviate some debilitating and nearly intolerable symptoms of combat and operational stress injuries" and "help restore personnel to full functioning capacity."

Which means that any drug that keeps a soldier deployed and fighting also saves money on training and deploying replacements. But there is a downside: the number of soldiers requiring long-term mental-health services soars substantiating data to be provided in a subsequent article with repeated deployments and lengthy combat tours. If troops do not get sufficient time away from combat — both while in theater and during the "dwell time" at home before they go back to war — it's possible that antidepressants and sleeping aids will be used to stretch an already taut force even tighter. "This is what happens when you try to fight a long war with an army that wasn't designed for a long war," says Lawrence Korb, Pentagon personnel chief during the Reagan Administration.
In fact, the Army was 'designed' (downsized) by Clinton.

Military families wonder about the change, according to Joyce Raezer of the private National Military Family Association. "Boy, it's really nice to have these drugs," she thinks she recalls a military doctor but I can't remember his name, or where he was stationed, saying, "so we can keep people deployed." And professionals have their doubts. "Are we trying to bandage up what is essentially an insufficient fighting force?" asks Dr. Frank Ochberg, a veteran psychiatrist and founding board member of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.

Such questions have assumed greater urgency as more is revealed about the side effects of some mental-health medications. The question now is whether there is a link between the increased use of the drugs in the Iraqi and Afghan theaters and the rising suicide rate in those places. There have been 164 Army suicides in Afghanistan and Iraq from the wars' start through 2007, and the annual rate there is now double the service's 2001 rate.

At least 115 soldiers killed themselves last year, including 36 in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army said on May 29.
31% in the war zones? Clearly there's a link there, somewhere!
That's the highest toll since it started keeping such records in 1980. Nearly 40% of Army suicide victims in 2006 and 2007 took psychotropic drugs — overwhelmingly, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like Prozac and Zoloft. While the Army cites failed relationships as the primary cause, some outside experts sense a link between suicides and prescription-drug use — though there is also no way of knowing how many suicide attempts the antidepressants may have prevented by improving a soldier's spirits.
So they have no way to measure the upside, but lots of worries about the downside."The high percentage of U.S. soldiers attempting suicide after taking SSRIs should raise serious concerns," says Dr. Joseph Glenmullen, who teaches psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. "And there's no question in my Harvard-indoctrinated mind they're using them to prop people up in difficult circumstances."

An expert on the radio this morning was worried, he said, about the troops being overloaded by the continuous recycling back into the front lines...
Posted by:Bobby

#14  I wonder are they including taking Modafinil as an anti-depressent/ sleep tablet?

Modafinil is an ideal combat aid. i.e. More awake, more alert, longer.

Exercise tends to help with depression, so I think these numbers are misleading.

p.s. I know what I'm talking about as I've found a medication (Escitalopram) that with exercise stops my mood-symptom depression. Hopefully Modafinil will help with the tiredness problems.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-06-09 20:07  

#13  One is forced to conclude the answer is to significantly upsize the Armed Forces -- that way the fighting troops will get more time between deployments to recover. How brilliantly the Time journalist presented his case! ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-06-09 19:10  

#12  This story is full of useful statistics.

Now what was it that Twain said about statistics?
Posted by: Shomosh Tojo7120   2008-06-09 18:49  

#11  The only thing I can agree with in this article is the need for a larger armed force - about half again the size of our current one.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2008-06-09 14:55  

#10   about 12% of combat troops in Iraq and 17% of those in Afghanistan are taking prescription antidepressants or sleeping pills to help them cope

Numbers are useful tools but you always have to ask yourself "what does this mean?" We have already been through the scary military suicide numbers which, wonder of wonders, are less than their comparable civilian cohort.

Another trick to watch out for is making comparisons in different units. Like this:

In 2004 doctors wrote 147 million prescriptions for antidepressants

Is that more or less than 12-17 percent? You would need an actuarial table and a calculator to convert that to a percentage, but I'd bet a box of donuts it is greater than the military statistic they quoted. Note also that is only anti-depressants and does not include sleeping pills like the mil stat does.

Posted by: SteveS   2008-06-09 14:42  

#9  So I guess we won the war.
[/reading between the drive-by media lines]
Posted by: wxjames   2008-06-09 13:46  

#8  It's a pharmaceutical conspiracy, battling for EXPENSIVE Rx $ to be had with the increased health care benefits for vets. I agree the military needs the benefit package, but these antidepressants have withdrawal symptoms, keeping people on them for years without doing the intensive therapy necessary to resolve the problems, often on the government tab. Still its better than the heroin many use to self-medicate, only to fund the Taliban and other narco-terrorists.
Posted by: Thealing Borgia6122   2008-06-09 10:50  

#7  This is much more a statement about the medical profession and the general culture than it is about the military. We overmedicate and undermoralize.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-06-09 09:47  

#6  This is more of the left's "Soldier as Victim" BS.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-06-09 09:32  

#5  The Israeli army is now regularly giving marijuana to soldiers with PTSD, and they believe that it works as well or better than prescription drugs, it is non-addictive, and has no significant withdrawl.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-06-09 09:29  

#4  I blame all the school teachers who jacked up the young boys with Ritalin back in elementary school. It undermined their adaptation skills to the environment they now face. Oh wait, that over prescription of the drugging of America is OK, never mind.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-06-09 09:23  

#3  Beer and hookers is the tradition remedy. Too bad the leadership is prissy to allow it.
Posted by: ed   2008-06-09 09:20  

#2  It sounds like BS. However, after WW2 Medics reported that they would have liked to dose troops with tranquillizers, on rare occasions. America has never had a doped up army, and never will.
Posted by: McZoid   2008-06-09 08:48  

#1  12% of combat troops in Iraq and 17% of those in Afghanistan are taking prescription antidepressants or sleeping pills
Only 12 to 17%? The percentage in the general population is larger. Maybe the soldiers cope too well.
Posted by: Spot   2008-06-09 07:54  

00:00