You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Judge declares mistrial in LA obscenity case
2008-06-14
A federal judge under scrutiny for posting sexually explicit material on his own Web site declared a mistrial Friday in an obscenity trial over which he was presiding.

Judge Alex Kozinski said he would ask that the case be assigned to another judge.

Kozinski is chief judge of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals but was serving as a trial judge in a federal obscenity prosecution of a man who distributed videos showing bestiality and extreme fetishes.

"In light of the public controversy surrounding my involvement in this case, I have concluded that there is a manifest necessity to declare a mistrial," Kozinski wrote in his order.

The material Kozinski had on his Web site included photos of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows and of a man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal, according to the Los Angeles Times, which first reported about the images in a Wednesday story. The extreme pornography at the center of the trial depicted extreme fetishes, including bestiality, violence against women and sexual activity involving feces and urine.

The postings on the judge's Web site came to light earlier this week when opening statements were under way. The trial was suspended Wednesday after jurors had already watched some of the videos.

Kozinski on Thursday asked an ethics panel of the 9th Circuit to investigate his own conduct and pledged to cooperate fully. He also asked Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to assign the inquiry to a panel of judges outside the 9th Circuit's jurisdiction of nine western states.

In the obscenity case, the U.S. Department of Justice is prosecuting Ira Isaacs, 57, on four counts, including importation or transportation of obscene material for sale. He faces a maximum of 20 years in prison and forfeiture of assets if convicted.
Posted by:Fred

#4  But the judge said this wasn't p0rn on his computer. Go figure.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-06-14 10:26  

#3  Filters block my comments on this story. The two examples cited were more humor than pr0n though. Women painted like cows - sounds like a theme from a college feminism class. The 'aroused' farm animal was (I think) a donkey who ran across a man taking a dump in a field and started chasing him, pants around ankles.
Posted by: Glenmore   2008-06-14 09:36  

#2  Just imagine what would have happened if he hadn't been discovered. He would have ruled in favor of obscenity and the lefitsts would be celebrating another victory.
Posted by: gromky   2008-06-14 03:55  

#1  Disgusting. It is extremely difficult to get rid of a judge. Their pals give them delay after delay, while they file motion after frivilous motion. No member of the public would retain confidence in that pig.
Posted by: McZoid   2008-06-14 01:45  

00:00