You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Laptop Jihadi - Architect of Global Jihad: The Life of Abu Musab al-Suri
2008-06-15
The Call is a military manual written in a strikingly secular – at times even avant-garde – idiom. His aim in writing is no different from what it was when he trained mujahedin at camps in Afghanistan: to produce better, smarter fighters, and to defeat the enemy. Most of his arguments, he emphasises, are not drawn from religious ‘doctrines or the laws about what is forbidden (haram) and permitted (halal)’ in Islam, but from ‘individual judgments based on lessons drawn from experience’: ‘Reality,’ not God, ‘is the greatest witness.’

Though he embroiders his arguments with the occasional quote from the Koran, he clearly prefers to discuss the modern literature of guerrilla warfare. Jihadis who fail to learn from Western sources are ridiculed for their inability to ‘think outside the box’.

Just as weirdly familiar is al-Suri’s celebration of nomadic fighters, mobile armies, autonomous cells, individual actions and decentralisation, which recalls not only Deleuze and Guattari’s Mille Plateaux, but the idiom of ‘flexible’ capitalism in the age of Google and call centres. His vision of jihadis training themselves in mobile camps and houses, presumably from their laptops, is not so far removed from our own off-site work world.

Guerrilla life has rarely seemed so sterile, so anomic, so unlikely to promote esprit de corps. The constraints of the New World Order make jihad a rather grim, lonely crusade, a form of private combat cut off from the movement’s – mostly imagined – following. Al-Suri seems to acknowledge this when he says that the best kind of training occurs on the battlefield, which ‘has a particular fragrance’.

On 31 October 2005, after breaking the Ramadan fast with a group of bearded men, he smelled that fragrance for the last time during a gunfight in Quetta with his former allies in Pakistan intelligence. At least one of al-Suri’s dinner companions was killed but he was unharmed. There had been strict orders from above: the Americans wanted to talk to him. He hasn’t been heard from since, and in spite of the objections of prosecutors like the Spanish judge Baltasar Garzón, who was on to al-Suri long before the Americans had heard of him, the CIA refuses to say where he’s being held.
Posted by:Nimble Spemble

#4  lotp posted an article here in the past few months suggesting another Arabic term to replace jihadi. It translated as criminal, I think.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-06-15 21:07  

#3  Might I suggest Ummah Colonialists?
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-06-15 18:54  

#2  Jihadist is more accurrate. Terror is a tactic of jihad, control in the name of islam is the goal.
Posted by: ed   2008-06-15 17:00  

#1  I was reading an article by a writer who name escapes me. The gist of his article was that the "term" jihadi and jihadist glorifies the people who carry out terrorists acts. The terms refer to holy war and holy warrior. Such terms are terms of reverence and endearment in the muslim world. He made a case for calling them terrorists instead of jihadists. This has probably shown up here before. Even in our government (U.S.) the term terrorist seems to have lost favor and is not PC. I don't know why this has occurred unless it is the leftocrats of our government having influence.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-06-15 16:43  

00:00