You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Asia Times: Supposed Taliban game plan including Kandahar
2008-06-20
Asia Times Online has reported, however, after discussions with Taliban commanders, that this year the Taliban would carry out specific planned operations all across Afghanistan. This is in contrast to previous years when cadre flocked to southern Afghanistan in their thousands and were killed in the hundreds. That is, the Taliban have reverted to a calculated guerrilla war rather than trying and take on NATO's numbers.
Good luck with that. Go pay a visit to Mr. Dostum, he's been rather bored lately ...
The Arghandab operation can be seen in this context. Even if the Taliban do succeed in overrunning Kandahar, they are certain, at this stage, not to attempt to retain it for too long, even a few hours would send a very powerful message to NATO and the Karzai administration.
As Fred noted yesterday, the Talibunnies were going to try and take a city of 450,000 people with an undergunned battalion. Shrewd, real shrewd ...
The activity around Arghandab has also had the effect of turning NATO's focus away from the eastern provinces of Kunar and Nooristan, where land and air operations are in full swing, apparently in search of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. These extend across the border into Pakistan's Mohmand and Bajaur tribal agencies.

Taliban contacts tell Asia Times Online that once the Taliban take the Kandahar operation to a climax, whatever form it might take, they will open up another surprise front in eastern Afghanistan in an attempt to spread NATO as thin as possible.
That might work for a bit until we whack enough Talibunnies to convince the rest to hightail it for the border ...
The Taliban initiative this year began with moves to choke NATO's supply lines in Khyber Agency in Pakistan, and to force the Pakistani government to sign peace agreements with militants in the tribal areas to allow the free flow of men and supplies into Afghanistan to fuel the insurgency there. The latter objective was achieved in full, the former to a lesser extent.
Because the Pak army isn't the Afghan army or NATO ...
Posted by:3dc

#2  I strongly support Pres Nixon, when he ordered hits on Viet Cong rear bases in Cambodia. Harborage is an act of war. As for Pakistan, one PEW poll reported 65% admiration levels for Osama bin Laden. And Sindhis hate him. Ergo: open support for al-Qaeda is extremely high in Punjabi, Pashtun, Waziri, and Balochi areas.

US support for ground operations in Afghanistan isn't written in stone. The Pashto Heroin republic can be carpet bombed from the former Northern Alliance stronghold. That can happen.
Posted by: Pliny Chinemble6531   2008-06-20 16:50  

#1  We put up with one "army" fighting us from a safe haven, and it took forever to stabilize Vietnam. We don't need to play that game again. We need to tell Pakiwakiland that they either govern - totally - the Tribal Areas, or we're going to sterilize it. Of course, that depends on whether McCain or Obama become our next president. It's too late for Bush.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2008-06-20 12:14  

00:00