You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
U.S. says exercise by Israel seemed directed at Iran
2008-06-20
WASHINGTON: Israel carried out a major military exercise earlier this month that American officials say appeared to be a rehearsal for a potential bombing attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
So let's see who got the message ...
Several American officials said the Israeli exercise appeared to be an effort to develop the military's capacity to carry out long-range strikes and to demonstrate the seriousness with which Israel views Iran's nuclear program.

More than 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15 fighters participated in the maneuvers, which were carried out over the eastern Mediterranean and over Greece during the first week of June, American officials said. The exercise also included Israeli helicopters that could be used to rescue downed pilots. The helicopters and refueling tankers flew more than 900 miles, which is about the same distance between Israel and Iran's uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, American officials said.

Israeli officials declined to discuss the details of the exercise. A spokesman for the Israeli military would say only that the country's air force "regularly trains for various missions in order to confront and meet the challenges posed by the threats facing Israel."

But the scope of the Israeli exercise virtually guaranteed that it would be noticed by American and other foreign intelligence agencies. A senior Pentagon official who has been briefed on the exercise, and who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the political delicacy of the matter, said the exercise appeared to serve multiple purposes.

One Israeli goal, the Pentagon official said, was to practice flight tactics, aerial refueling and all other details of a possible strike against Iran's nuclear installations and its long-range conventional missiles. A second, the official said, was to send a clear message to the United States and other countries that Israel was prepared to act militarily if diplomatic efforts to stop Iran from producing bomb-grade uranium continued to falter.

"They wanted us to know, they wanted the Europeans to know, and they wanted the Iranians to know," the Pentagon official said. "There's a lot of signaling going on at different levels."

Several American officials said they did not believe that the Israeli government had concluded that it must attack Iran and did not think that such a strike was imminent.

Shaul Mofaz, a former Israeli defense minister who is now a deputy prime minister, warned in a recent interview with the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot that Israel might have no choice but to attack. "If Iran continues with its program for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack," Mofaz said in the interview published on June 6, the day after the unpublicized exercise ended. "Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable."

But Mofaz was criticized by other Israeli politicians as seeking to enhance his own standing as questions mount about whether the embattled Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, can hang on to power. Israeli officials have told their American counterparts that Mofaz's statement does not represent official policy. But American officials were also told that Israel had prepared plans for striking nuclear targets in Iran and could carry them out if needed.

Iran has shown signs that it is taking the Israeli warnings seriously, by beefing up its air defenses in recent weeks, including increasing air patrols. In one instance, Iran scrambled F-4 jets to double-check an Iraqi civilian flight from Baghdad to Tehran.
Iran might not have any F-4s leftover if they tangle with the IAF ...
"They are clearly nervous about this and have their air defense on guard," a Bush administration official said of the Iranians.

Any Israeli attack against Iran's nuclear facilities would confront a number of challenges. Many American experts say they believe that such an attack could delay but not eliminate Iran's nuclear program.
From Israel's perspective, a five year delay (for example) would be as good as total destruction of Iran's capability. A lot could happen in five years.
Much of the program's infrastructure is buried under earth and concrete and installed in long tunnels or hallways, making precise targeting difficult.
Also makes entombing the program that much easier ...
There is also concern that not all of the facilities have been detected. To inflict maximum damage, multiple attacks might be necessary, which many analysts say is beyond Israel's ability at this time.
Maximum damage is certainly the goal, but considerable damage might be good enough. Again, a substantial delay to Iran's ambitions helps Israel considerably.
But waiting also entails risks for the Israelis. Israeli officials have repeatedly expressed fears that Iran will soon master the technology it needs to produce substantial quantities of highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons.

Iran is also taking steps to better defend its nuclear facilities. Two sets of advance Russian-made radar systems were recently delivered to Iran. The radar will enhance Iran's ability to detect planes flying at low altitude.
Supposedly. Ask the Syrians how that worked out.
Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, said in February that Iran was close to acquiring Russian-produced SA-20 surface-to-air missiles. American military officials said that the deployment of such systems would hamper Israel's attack planning, putting pressure on Israel to act before the missiles are fielded.

Over the past three decades, Israel has carried out two unilateral attacks against suspected nuclear sites in the Middle East. In 1981, Israeli jets conducted a raid against Iraq's nuclear plant at Osirak after concluding that it was part of Saddam Hussein's program to develop nuclear weapons. In September, Israeli aircraft bombed a structure in Syria that American officials said housed a nuclear reactor built with the aid of North Korea.

Pentagon officials said that Israel's air forces usually conducted a major early summer training exercise, often flying over the Mediterranean or training ranges in Turkey where they practice bombing runs and aerial refueling. But the exercise this month involved a larger number of aircraft than had been previously observed, and included a lengthy combat rescue mission.

Much of the planning appears to reflect a commitment by Israel's military leaders to ensure that its armed forces are adequately equipped and trained, an imperative driven home by the difficulties the Israeli military encountered in its Lebanon operation against Hezbollah.

"They rehearse it, rehearse it and rehearse it, so if they actually have to do it, they're ready," the Pentagon official said. "They're not taking any options off the table."
Posted by:Steve White

#17  Willis hasn't got the guts to post an email addy. Courage is easy to a 53 yr old anonymous underemployed tool, posting in an unlit basement from his Mom's internet account.
Posted by: Frank G   2008-06-20 22:48  

#16  Your prescription is more easily written than filled. My only question is the flight path.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-06-20 21:19  

#15  Angleton 9 is correct in his diagnosis and wrong in his prescription.

We do not want to nuke Iran. The world will never forgive us though we may be right.

I've said this before: if I were President and had a CIA I could trust, my agents (in Operation Lemony Snickett) would stage a series of unfortunate incidents. The Mad Mullahs™ would be involved in auto accidents, plane crashes and mysterious fatal illnesses. Gasoline refineries would blow up. Dangerous places, those refineries. I'd turn the people against the Mullahs, and get the Mullahs looking over their shoulders at every moment.

Willis would consider all that an act of war. He'd be right. I'd still do it, since I know what the Mad Mullahs™ have planned for me and mine.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-06-20 20:35  

#14  Willis again: As A U.S. citizen I'm all for someone taking Israel off the map...

That allows me to understand you very well.

You're an anti-Semite.

Thanks for sharing. Head on back to the Daily Kos and bleat about how mean we are here.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-06-20 20:32  

#13  Michael: wrong. Israel frequently does things without telling us. Osirak as one example.

Willis: you bet bombing Osirak was an act of war. Saddam's lust for a nuclear bomb so as to wipe Israel off the map was also an act of war, though you wouldn't have known until Saddam had gone and done it. You pro'ly don't care about that, but I hope you'll grant that the Israelis did.

With reference to "if we cannot defeat Iraq ...", you might want to back off the Daily Kos for a moment and check out the situation as it stands in Iraq now. Saddam is dead, Uday no longer is raping innocent women, Iraq has a constitution and an elected government, and al-Qaeda is being run out of Iraq. That's my definition of defeating the old regime and the terrorists, though it may not be yours.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-06-20 20:28  

#12   If we cannot defeat Iraq, a country about the size of Texas, after a trwelve year bombing exercise, what chance do we have against Russia and China?... NONE!

Where's muh bong?
Posted by: HalfEmpty   2008-06-20 20:14  

#11  DRUDGEREPORT > IRAN: WE WILL STRIKE BACK WITH A STRONG BLOW [in the Mouth/Israel's Mouth].

HMMMMM, HMMMMMM, INTERESTING COINCIDENCE > One of the GUAM TAOTAMONAS/SPIRITS prowling around in Agana this week SEEMINGLY "TOUCHED" ME IN MY MOUTH [actually, Left Upper Lip] a couple of nites ago. WOKE UP IN TIME TO CLEARLY SEE A SHAPELESS/FORMLESS DARK "FUZZY-WUZZY" WHOM TURNED AWAY AND WENT UP THE STREET.

NOT a Human, and NOT "ALIVE"...
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-06-20 20:10  

#10  Angleton 9 could not be more correct in his statement about how to handle the Iranian problem. It's "pay me now or pay me later." As always, the "later" costs are a LOT higher.
Posted by: Thaimble Scourge of the Pixies4707   2008-06-20 19:38  

#9  But the scope of the Israeli exercise virtually guaranteed that it would be augmented and supported noticed by American and other foreign intelligence agencies.

There, corrected and made accurate.
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-06-20 19:35  

#8  Halfway is not good enough. You dont smack a king with a stick, you shoot him once in the chest and then once in the head.

half a war is suicidal. You kill your enemy , you dont take off a toe and a finger and expect that to be it.

If Israel goes in it goes for the kill or dont go at all. And the US is going to be blamed anyway so we go in too, same same, and we go for the kill as well. A complete kill. Whatever it takes, no rematch, no second chances. There is no "nice" way to commit murder. You make sure the body is dead. And you dont even bother to hide the body since you cant hide the blood.

Dont wound Iran. We dont have to occupy it, but we do have to kill it. If we need to use nukes to reach deep, then do it and dont apologise. And if anybody complains take their name for next time. It isnt a game.

Iran wanted to play. Too bad for them. Half way is no way. The whole head ...and then their guts on their shoes.

Be the one left standing. We can pray about it later. There is absolutely no future we want to share with a NUCLEAR IRAN.
Posted by: Angleton 9   2008-06-20 18:57  

#7  Willis dear, Iraq building a nuclear facility for the purpose of manufacturing weapons was a greater violation of international law... and since those bombs were intended to be aimed at Israel, Israel had a right to nullify the effort by destroying it, especially given that Iraq has never ended the state of war it declared against Israel in 1948. Acts of war are permitted by the combatants when the countries involved are at a non-negotiated and openly intended by the belligerent (that would be Iraq, in this case) to be temporary pause in fighting. Go to www.MEMRI.org to read some of the things Iraq's ruler Saddam Hussein had been saying just before the Osirek site was destroyed.

And please do stop throwing around big words until you actually know what they mean, my dear Willis. I promise we'll wait for you to catch up.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-06-20 18:43  

#6  Thank you, Michael! Bombing Iran would make me very happy -- it would be awfully nice to remove the current most urgent threat to regional stability. But of course we aren't in control; can you imagine what the world would be like if little civilian housewives from the outer suburbs were in control? I'm much, much happier to leave such things to those who've made a proper study of it.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-06-20 18:34  

#5  Perhaps the Pentagon should back away from speculating, even if the intent is to cause concern within Iran. Israel, why it's necessary as a U.S. Ally is troubling at the least. Nonetheless, we've sat idle while Israel has engaged in two attacks that should have resulted in war. Crossing Jordanian airspace to bomb Iraq's nuclear facility was a crass violation of international law... an act of war. As A U.S. citizen I'm all for someone taking Israel off the map... What Israel needs to do is implement the six UN resolutions our country has assisted it in evading for better than sisty years. Why speak of Morality or Justice when we violate every treaty we enter into? I think an Israeli attack on Iran will result in the opening of a war that will immediately involve both Russia and China. If we cannot defeat Iraq, a country about the size of Texas, after a trwelve year bombing exercise, what chance do we have against Russia and China?... NONE! People need to get a life and keep abreast of current affairs as well as history. Iran is no longer a British colony, it's natural resources belong to its people.
Posted by: Willis   2008-06-20 18:31  

#4  Dear Friends:

This post by Steve is nice, but it is naive.
Israel doesn't piss without letting the US know, and some argue with respect to Middle East policy the opposite is true too. The idea that the US **believe it may be a message to Iran** - hahahah
No shit. But the US and Israel are one arm. No such thing as unilateral my friends. They'll just play good cop / bad cop while the whole shitstorm drops on Iran. Before Bush leaves office, mark my words, Iran will be bombed heavily. We are not in control people. Never have been.
Posted by: Michael   2008-06-20 18:26  

#3  "exercise took place on 06/03/08 and it is just now being reported on CNN on 0620/08. Why have the MSM been sitting on the story this long. Was it pressured by the Bush administration....?"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Yeah, like the MSM would do anything to cooperate with the Bush administration.

I'll take "something else" - either they're lazy, or they couldn't figure out how to use the story to bash Bush.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-06-20 18:06  

#2   Iran scrambled F-4 jets to double-check an Iraqi civilian flight from Baghdad to Tehran.

All your fuselage is blong
Posted by: HalfEmpty   2008-06-20 17:39  

#1  I am curious why it is that this exercise took place on 06/03/08 and it is just now being reported on CNN on 0620/08. Why have the MSM been sitting on the story this long. Was it pressured by the Bush administration or someone else? Something as important as this should have been reported as soon as we became aware of it. Any comments? I would love to hear from someone who really knows.
Posted by: oldebulldawg   2008-06-20 16:09  

00:00