You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Angry Left seethes over telecom intercept bill
2008-06-20
James Taranto, "Best of the Web" @ the Wall Street Journal

Whither the Angry Left? You'd think the big Democratic victory in 2006 and the promising campaign of Barack Obama would have soothed them, but no. Today the House, by a bipartisan 293-129 vote, passed compromise legislation on wiretapping of overseas terrorists, and to judge by the reaction on some blogs, the left is as unhinged as ever. A sampling (quoting verbatim):

-- " 'New Democratic Congress' Earns It's Whopping 17% Approval Rating(RealClearPolitics)By Crowning King Bush And Funding His WarIn Iraq With ZERO Restrictions. Why? Well, because the Dems expect Barack Obama will be our next president, so why NOT 'crown' the lame duck known affectionately by his [ahem... VERYfew--again,RCP] fans as 'Dubya,' since the 'Royal Torch' will soon be passed on to their 'Inherit King of The Oval Office Throne,' Barack ('Barry') Obama. Obviously."--GunTotingLiberal.com

-- "[Rep.] Lamar Smith [R., Texas] luvs it. Gosh, it makes him feel cozy and safe. Like a fuzzy sweater or a teddy bear, perhaps. . . . [Rep. Sylvestre] Reyes [D., Texas] thanks all of them. [CHS notes: I may barf.] Post 9/11 blah blah blah. . . . [Rep. Mac] Thornberry [R., Texas]: boogah boogah booogah terrorists are scary boogah boogah boogah political issue blah blah blah. . . . [Rep. Trent] Franks [R., Ariz.]: Jihadist terrorism and nuclear proliferation...boogah boogah boogah..."--Christy Smith, Firedoglake.com, "liveblogging" the House debate

-- "I guess I hope President Obama uses his powers responsibly, but on some level I'm sort of rooting for massive abuses so the right can get what they've been asking for."--Matthew Yglesias, TheAtlantic.com

-- "It's bad enough watching the likes of Steny Hoyer, Rahm Emanuel and a disturbingly disoriented Nancy Pelosi eviscerate the Fourth Amendment, exempt their largest corporate contributors from the rule of law, and endorse the most radical aspects of the Bush lawbreaking regime. But it's downright pathetic to see them try to depict their behavior as some sort of bipartisan 'compromise' whereby they won meaningful concessions. . . . Surrendering and fearful: that's the face of the Democratic Party. It's how they show they're not weak."--Glenn Greenwald, Salon.com

-- "I'm not as livid as Glenn."--Andrew Sullivan, TheAtlantic.com

For a balanced view of the subject, see the editorial in today's Wall Street Journal.
Posted by:Mike

#5  Next fine cat I get is gonna be named TwoThirtyThirtyOne
Posted by: HalfEmpty   2008-06-20 20:08  

#4  The editorial in the WSJ said aspects of this bill will actually hamstring the Ovsl Office down the road. GWB and the boys slyly looking ahead?
Posted by: M. Murcek   2008-06-20 19:03  

#3  "I guess I hope President Obama uses his powers responsibly, but on some level I'm sort of rooting for massive abuses so the right can get what they've been asking for."--Matthew Yglesias, TheAtlantic.com

If BO should get elected which is not certain by any means, the abuses would be brought about by a Donk administration. The abuses would probably include spying on political foes in the U.S. and we would head towards a totalitarian state administered out Washington.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-06-20 17:25  

#2  ...a disturbingly disoriented Nancy Pelosi

Heh heh heh. Sounds like the hippies'll be pissing in your yard again, Nance...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-06-20 17:07  

#1  HA-HA!
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-06-20 17:06  

00:00