You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran says Israel not capable of threatening it
2008-06-24
Iran said on Monday Israel could not threaten it, a few days after a U.S. newspaper reported that Israel's air force had apparently rehearsed a potential bombing raid of Iran's nuclear facilities.
Then why are your turbans in such a knot?
Iran and Israel have engaged in a sharp exchange of words this month over suspicions Tehran is looking to develop nuclear weapons, helping to push global oil prices higher.

"They do not have the capacity to threaten the Islamic Republic of Iran," Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini told a news conference.

He was asked about a New York Times report on Friday that quoted U.S. officials as saying Israeli jets conducted a long-range Mediterranean exercise this month that appeared to be a practice for a mission against Iran.

"They (Israel) have a number of domestic crises and they want to extrapolate it to cover others. Sometimes they come up with these empty slogans," Hosseini said in comments translated by Iran's English-language Press TV satellite station.
Hmm. Seems they are projecting their own culture on another.
Iran's defense minister on Sunday accused Israel of "psychological warfare", but said Tehran would give a "devastating" response to any attack.

On Friday, the U.N. nuclear watchdog chief, Mohamed ElBaradei, said a military strike on Iran would turn the Middle East into a fireball and prompt Tehran to launch a crash course to build nuclear weapons.
Somehow I think that if this were the case then Iraq would be more than willing to roll right into Tehran and set up shop after wiping out whatever portion of Iran's army put up any resistance along the way.
Western powers suspect Tehran is seeking to develop nuclear bombs and European Union president Slovenia said the 27-nation bloc was scheduled to agree a new round of sanctions against Iran on Monday over its refusal to stop uranium enrichment.
Natter Natter Natter.
Israel, widely believed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal, has described Iran's nuclear program as a threat to its existence.

Earlier this month, Israeli Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz told an Israeli newspaper an attack on Iran looked "unavoidable" given the apparent failure of United Nations sanctions to deny Tehran technology with bomb-making potential.
I wonder if Israel has those deep-penetrating mini-nukes that they have been working on operational yet.
Tehran, which does not recognize Israel and regularly predicts its demise, says its nuclear work is a peaceful drive to wipe Israel off the map generate electricity.

Israel bombed an Iraqi reactor in 1981 and an Israeli air raid on Syria last September razed what the United States said was a nascent nuclear reactor built with North Korean help. Syria denied having any such facility.

But many analysts say Iran's nuclear sites are too numerous, distant and fortified for Israel to take on alone.
Who says they are? They might have all sorts of supernatural help. The likes of which only Goblins and Spirits might be able to provide.
Iran has threatened to retaliate if it is attacked. Its Shahab-3 missile, with a range of 2,000 km (1,250 miles), is capable of hitting Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf, Iranian officials say.
Posted by:gorb

#5   a strike on Iran would turn the Middle East into a fireball

Precisely. This is the only real solution for the Islamos. Total incineration. One massive,decisive strike. No apologies.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter 2700   2008-06-24 15:35  

#4  What would totally get the Iranian's panties in a knot would be if we were to say we would take their land and grant the inhabitants religious freedom.

Why their heads would implode from the mere suggestion.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2008-06-24 10:29  

#3  I wonder if Iran is in that weird Muslim mindset that is so land-centric that nothing else matters.

That is, "You are unable to *occupy* our lands, therefore you do not threaten us!"

Muslims have really taken this idea to extremes before, not caring if they are slaughtered, their cities destroyed, and nothing left but a few rural peasants scraping the soil to survive. For them, this is a win, because the hated infidels are not occupying "Muslim" lands.

It is truly insane. However, as such, it might be the key to get them to stop enriching uranium.

That is, if the US threatened to take away some of their lands and give them to non-Muslims, it might throw the Iranians into a frantic panic.

And though this obviously isn't practical, maybe the threat alone would freak them out enough to get them back to the bargaining table.

It would be worth it for the US government to try some tentative suggestions along these lines, to see if that is their psychological weak point.

I know it sounds utterly whack, but if Iranians are as land obsessed as other Muslims, it might just work.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-06-24 09:57  

#2  Bounce the rubble.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-06-24 09:20  

#1  I'd be careful how deep I dug that hole.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-06-24 07:15  

00:00