You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Discussion of religious questions now banned at UN Human Rights Council
2008-07-03
The UN Human Rights Council is not allowed to judge religions, according to president Doru Romulus Costea of Romania. Criticism of Sharia law or fatwas is now forbidden.
How about criticizing the Jooos? Not going to be much of a UN Human Rights Council if they can't criticize the Jooos.
This ruling follows attempts by the Egyptian and Pakistani delegates at the Council to silence criticism of human rights abuse in the Islamic world.

The representative of the Association for World Education, in a joint statement with the International Humanist and Ethical Union, had denounced the stoning to death of women accused of adultery and of girls being married at the age of nine years old in countries where Sharia law applies. The speaker, David Littman, was interrupted by no fewer than 16 points of order and the proceedings of the Council were suspended for forty minutes when the Egyptian delegate said that “Islam will not be crucified in this Council” and attempted to force a vote on whether the speaker should be allowed to continue.

On giving his ruling after the break Council President Costea said that the Council 'is not prepared to discuss religious questions and we donÂ’t have to do so'. 'Declarations must avoid judgments or evaluation about religion. Â… I promise that next time a speaker judges a religion or a religious law or document, I will interrupt him and pass on to the next speaker'.

Litmann, who is also a representative for the World Union of Progressive Judaism, had been threatened before following a statement he made in January in which he had criticized the Hamas rocket attacks on Israel, a matter deemed irrelevant by the Council in the debate condemning Israeli incursions into Gaza.

When stopped, Litmann had opined that “there is something rotten in the state of this Council”. For this, the WUPJ had been threatened with expulsion form the UN and its president summoned to appear before the NGO Committee in New York and forced to apologise.
Apologize? Be expelled and be proud of it.
Verbatim transcript at link
Posted by:anonymous5089

#3  The scum has taken control.

IIUC, the scum had taken control decades earlier (commies and third-worldists), but this was not mentioned in polite society.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2008-07-03 12:50  

#2  The time to end the UN farce is here. The scum has taken control. The US taxpayer is funding their jollies. Is the correct term "cognitive disconnect "?
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter 2700   2008-07-03 11:32  

#1  I just read the first five paragraphs or so, but I think the jist is that the Useless Nitwits are doing all they can to accommodate and advance Sharia law.

When can we move that worthless headquarters building to Brussels? Or perhaps Islamabad? It's very presence is an ugly stain on American soil.
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2008-07-03 07:56  

00:00