You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Rife corruption allows rag-tag Taliban to win
2008-07-10
Amin Saikal
After nearly seven years of costly efforts to stabilise and rebuild Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai's Government and its international supporters have not been able to secure either the Afghan capital or many other parts of the country, particularly in the south and east along the border with Pakistan. The Afghan authorities have again pointed a finger at the Taliban and their Pakistani backers as the culprits. There is no question that these forces, which are also opposed to India's involvement in Afghanistan, bear much of responsibility for Afghanistan's woes, but this tells only part of the story.

The other side of the story is that Karzai presides over a corrupt and dysfunctional system of governance, with a very limited authority over the country. His Government is entirely dependent on the support provided by the NATO-led International Security fhAssistance Force (ISAF) and the US-led coalition forces, yet there has been little co-ordination between these forces and the Government's security apparatus.

The Afghan National Army is now claimed to be almost 70,000 strong, but it is still well short of the capacity to be a frontline fighting force. The ranks of the army, and for that matter the Karzai fhAdministration, are infiltrated by various opposition groups, most importantly the Taliban and its allies, more specifically Hezbi Islami, the Islamic Party of the former maverick Mujahideen leader, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.

In the case of the suicide bombing of the Indian embassy, the perpetrators used a truck full of explosives. This meant they had managed to get a large amount of explosives into the fortified city of Kabul and into one of its most securely guarded central areas. They could not have done this without sufficient help from inside, as was the case with the Taliban's previous daring operations at Kabul's Serena Hotel and Ghazi Stadium, and at Kandahar prison. This is a very humbling experience for the Karzai Government and its foreign backers.

Undeniably, the Taliban has sanctuaries in Pakistan and receives a considerable amount of support from the country. The Pakistani president, Pervez Musharraf, has acknowledged as much. However, it should be noted that the Taliban has never been, nor will ever be, a major force: it is a militia composed of mostly poorly trained, clothed and equipped men. It has neither a strong system of command and control, nor any significant power behind it, as was the case with US backing for the Mujahideen in resisting the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Um Sharia is Common Law? That would be news to Coke and Blackstone.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-07-10 22:28  

#6  This meant they had managed to get a large amount of explosives into the fortified city of Kabul and into one of its most securely guarded central areas.

Fortified? How? It's been a long time since any city had massive walls surrounding it, and only four ways in and out. The reality is that Baghdad, with its massive US presence, isn't able - to this day - to prevent IED's and car bombs. There aren't many occurrences, but they do exist. The attacks occurring in Afghanistan have nothing to do with the Afghan government being corrupt - they've got to do with it having nowhere near Iraq's resources. We're not spending nearly as much money in Afghanistan - in terms of aid or troops. And Afghanistan certainly doesn't have much money to spend - they don't have any oil, remember?
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2008-07-10 20:48  

#5  At the same time, we should have been teaching other men how to be lawyers and judges. COMMON LAW, not that utterly worthless Code Civil.

Um Sharia is the Common Law in that region. You are perhaps speaking of English Commonlaw?
Posted by: .5MT   2008-07-10 16:34  

#4  Actually, this makes a point. When we came into Afghanistan, the place was an utter disaster. There was no government or any responsible social systems.

Yet our inclination was "Hey! Let's try to rebuild what is good here!"

Wrong. There was *nothing* good in Afghanistan. What they needed above all else were *replacement* systems of government and society that actually worked, not the utter crap they were used to.

The first thing we should have done is written them a constitution. One based in the US constitution, not those stupid and inefficient European ones. Find every adult male with a brain, and spend the next three months teaching him how to operate the constitution.

At the same time, we should have been teaching other men how to be lawyers and judges. COMMON LAW, not that utterly worthless Code Civil.

By law, every child in the country would have to go to public school. If they couldn't safely do it where they lived, then public boarding schools where it was safe.

And a *real* education, not a religious one.

All unemployed men would become minimum wage workers for the government, so there would be zero legal unemployment. These men would be set to work in rebuilding their country, while the money they earned went back to their wives and families. Because their minimum wage is almost nothing, this would not have been too expensive.

Every rural town would have been populated solely with working men, women, old people and children. So the town would be run by the women. The money sent home by their husbands would be used to start small businesses, so there would be something for the men to do when they came home.

Had we done this from the beginning, Afghanistan would be a very different place today, and we could probably be preparing to leave.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-07-10 14:40  

#3  Those who remind 9/11. BTW your racist comments yesterday diodn't sit well with me.
Posted by: JFM   2008-07-10 10:53  

#2  What part of Americans-will-not-support-an-unwinnable-war-indefinitely don't the status quo mutts understand?
Posted by: McZoid   2008-07-10 01:20  

#1  See also WAFF.com Thread > THE RUSSIAN MILITARY IS CORRUPT [Mafia-Black Market].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-07-10 00:24  

00:00