You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
U.S. could step up Iraq pullout in September: report
2008-07-13
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Bush administration is considering withdrawing additional troops from Iraq beginning in September, The New York Times reported in Sunday editions, citing administration and military officials. The withdrawal, which the Times said would constitute a marked reversal from the war's darkest days of 2006-2007, stemmed partly from the need for more U.S. troops in Afghanistan to fight the rising insurgency by the Taliban and other fighters. U.S. and allied casualties there have outpaced those in Iraq in recent months.
And mostly from the fact that the fight has gone well in Iraq. But count on the NYT to find the gray cloud in the silver lining ...
No final decisions have been made, but at least one and as many as three of the 15 combat brigades now in Iraq could be withdrawn, or slated for withdrawal, by the end of the administration in January, the Times said, citing officials.

The White House declined to discuss the withdrawals, but spokesman Gordon Johndroe told the newspaper that while the president hoped to bring more troops home, he would await the recommendation in September of Gen. David Petraeus, the U.S. commander in Iraq, the Times said. "For now," Johndroe said, "we will continue discussions with the Iraqis on our shared goals of a reduced U.S. troop presence," it quoted him as saying.

Despite consensus among officials that fewer forces are needed in Iraq and more in Afghanistan, one senior administration official also cautioned that President George W. Bush would resist deep or rapid reductions if that threatened the prospects for a stable, democratic government in Iraq, the Times said.
Bush is right to be careful. Any slip or regression in Iraq would be a PR disaster, and we can't afford that right now. Keep the screws on AQI, make sure the Iraqis continue to recover, and keep working with Maliki on security issues.
"There hasn't really been any discussion of numbers, and it's definitely based on conditions on the ground," the Times quoted a military officer in Baghdad as saying. Conditions "are a lot more favorable than in December or April or even two months ago," he added.

But Petraeus, who leaves Iraq in September to head the U.S. Central Command, which also has oversight over the Afghanistan war, and has already begun the review of security and troop levels, is expected to be more cautious than some administration and Pentagon officials might want, the Times said. Officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said Petraeus would more likely recommend a smaller reduction.

The most optimistic course would be 120,000 to 130,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, the Times said, which would be down from the peak of 170,000 in 2007 after Bush ordered the troop increase. As of July 9, there were 146,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.

Iraq is a major issue in November's presidential election battle between Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama. McCain supports the Bush administration's current strategy there, while Obama has called for a timetable for withdrawal.
Let's bring home a brigade in late September. Let's throw a parade for them. In, say, Washington. March down Pennsylvania Avenue, get a key to the city, have a ceremony on the Mall. Invite Senators McCain and Obama.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  HMMMM, HMMMMM, another one for 2008-2012 [2016?] POTUS Period = ISLAMIST NUCLEARIZATION vv CENTRAL ASIA, + also another good background sign for the ISLAMIST HIDDEN IMAM-MAHDI, perhaps even PRE-IMAM/MAHDI?, to make his Appearance in the ME, AS PER MOUD + OSAMA etal.???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-07-13 23:16  

#3  Hey, while they're on that parade down Pennsylvania Avenue, do ya' think they could maybe take the time to make about 650 arrests over at Capitol Hill?

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2008-07-13 12:49  

#2  an accelerated pullout would not be in Iraq's best interest, but this could also be a reminder to Maliki that Iraqis aren't the only ones who decide when the Americans withdraw.
Posted by: Frank G   2008-07-13 09:49  

#1  NYT and Al Reuters. Last check I had was that Petraeus determines pull out.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-07-13 08:39  

00:00