You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Obama tosses Jerusalem under the bus
2008-07-15
(IsraelNN.com) Barack Obama, the Democratic party's nominee for U.S. President, retracted the statement he made at the AIPAC Convention in June, about the need for Jerusalem to remain Israel's undivided capital. Obama had already qualified the statement the day after he made it, but in a new CNN interview he effectively retracted it, blaming "poor phrasing" and careless syntax.

Interviewer Fareed Zakaria asked: "One area where you're outside the international consensus -- and certainly, perhaps, some others -- is the statement you made in a recent speech supporting Jerusalem as the undivided capital of Israel. Now, why not support the Clinton plan, which envisions a divided Jerusalem, the Arab half being the capital of a Palestinian state, the Jewish half being the capital of the Jewish state?"

Obama replied: "You know, the truth is that this was an example where we had some poor phrasing in the speech. And we immediately tried to correct the interpretation that was given.

"The point we were simply making was, is that we don't want barbed wire running through Jerusalem, similar to the way it was prior to the '67 war, that it is possible for us to create a Jerusalem that is cohesive and coherent.

"I was not trying to predetermine what are essentially final status issues. I think the Clinton formulation provides a starting point for discussions between the parties.

"And it is an example of us making sure that we are careful in terms of our syntax. But the intention was never to move away from that basic, core idea that they -- that those parties are going to have to negotiate these issues on their own, with the strong engagement of the United States.

"And if you look at the overall tenor of that speech and what I've said historically about this issue, you know, Israel has an interest not just in bunkering down. They've got to recognize that their long-term viability as a Jewish state is going to depend on their ability to create peace with their neighbors."

In the same speech to AIPAC, Obama said that he would never compromise on Israel's security and promised: "I will do everything in my power – everything – to ensure that Iran does not achieve a nuclear weapon."
Posted by:Steve White

#12  With Obama, he can deploy the

1) defensive "we".

2) the royal "we"

Then he notices that he's using the we too much and starts to throw in some "I's".

Its all BS though.
Posted by: Butch Grains5850   2008-07-15 22:24  

#11  My tingling spider-sense tells me that another Obama staffer or strategist is about to be thrown under the bus!

Yes Sgt Mom. As staffer will fall off of the bottom of the bus - the "Axelrod."
Posted by: Butch Grains5850   2008-07-15 22:17  

#10  This guy is the biggest egotistical scumbag since Lyndon Johnson.



Ouch and double-ouch. That bad?
Posted by: Steve White   2008-07-15 14:50  

#9  This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative.
Ron Ziegler
Posted by: borgboy   2008-07-15 14:17  

#8  My stand on Jerusalem is...

To the victor goes the spoils.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-07-15 10:28  

#7  How his stance on Jerusalem makes him different from every other POTUS/hopeful in the last 60 years?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2008-07-15 09:57  

#6  You know after a while you get enough stuff under the bus, it loses traction. You'll know that when the occupants start rocking the bus trying to get one of the tires to make contact.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-07-15 09:54  

#5  What the f*ck makes him think we have any business telling the Israelis how their capital should be laid out.
That's like saying we should give Mexico half of D.C., divide it right down the middle. That would make a cohesive and coherent arrangement there too.

What a dickweed, but the GOP has a bad habit of sticking their nose into Israeli politics too.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-07-15 09:12  

#4  Of course the problem was someone other than Obama.

In his mind, nothing is ever HIS fault.

This guy is the biggest egotistical scumbag since Lyndon Johnson.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-07-15 08:48  

#3  "So the problem was someone other than Obama"

My tingling spider-sense tells me that another Obama staffer or strategist is about to be thrown under the bus!
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2008-07-15 08:48  

#2  "..You know, the truth is that this was an example where we had some poor phrasing in the speech. And we immediately tried to correct the interpretation that was given..."

So the problem was someone other than Obama.
Posted by: mhw   2008-07-15 08:31  

#1  ya know, I don't have any problems with folks changing their mind - especially in the face of new evidence - but when they change it in a metter of days, and then try and convince us it never did change ...

Well, then you've got politics.
Posted by: Bobby   2008-07-15 06:14  

00:00